fluctuations in growth processes
play

Fluctuations in Growth Processes Angad Yuvraj and Dominic Yates - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Fluctuations in Growth Processes Angad Yuvraj and Dominic Yates Supervised by Alex Adamou, Ole Peters and Rosalba Garca Milln 1 Introduction Classical view holds that fluctuations are irrelevant to growth of a system. Recent


  1. Fluctuations in Growth Processes Angad Yuvraj and Dominic Yates Supervised by Alex Adamou, Ole Peters and Rosalba García Millán 1

  2. Introduction • Classical view holds that fluctuations are irrelevant to growth of a system. • Recent advancements demonstrate that fluctuations do play a role when considering the growth rate of the system. • It has been shown that individuals achieve boost in growth rate by completely pooling and equally splitting their resources. • We extend this concept to consider more practical forms of sharing than this type of “cooperation”. • We consider the effects of two types of resource sharing on growth rate, and the impact of fluctuations. 2

  3. Geometric Brownian Motion • 3

  4. Geometric Brownian Motion • 4

  5. 5

  6. Cooperation • 6

  7. 7

  8. Cooperation • 8

  9. 9

  10. Our Model • The motivation behind our model came after studying a paper by Jain and Krishna on the evolution of a complex system. • The system comprised of elements that catalysed the growth of other elements. • We noted that this represented a system in which individuals were cooperating, except that there was no cost to the catalysis. • This meant that the system didn’t display the same conservation present in the previous cooperation model, in which individuals pooled and split resources. • Their guiding equation helped us to generalise the cooperation model. 10

  11. Our Model • We consider a population of N individuals which interact through the giving and taking of resources, not necessarily in a symmetric manner. • We visualise this concept through graphs where each node represented an individual and directed edges represented the flow of resources. • We do not allow a node to have a directed edge to itself, and each node may have at most one directed edge towards each other node. • We allow edges to have different weights, corresponding to different rates of resource sharing. 11

  12. The Weighted Adjacency Matrix • v 0.5 v v 1 v 1.1 v v 12

  13. Our Model • 13

  14. Receiving Giving Term Term Our Model • 14

  15. Our Model • 15

  16. Our Model • 16

  17. The Deterministic Case • 17

  18. Questions • What happens when individuals only engage in partial sharing? • What rate of sharing does it take to achieve maximum growth rate? • To what extent does growth rate depend on the way resources are distributed? • Does any of the above depend on how noisy the system is? 18

  19. Complete Graph on N nodes • 19

  20. Complete Graph on N nodes • Fully Connected Graph for N = 5 20

  21. N-Cycle • N-Cycle for N = 5 21

  22. The Complete Graph for N = 2 • 22

  23. 23

  24. Normalised Growth, G • 24

  25. Normalised Growth, G • 25

  26. Normalised Growth, G • 26

  27. 27

  28. 28

  29. 29

  30. Interpretation of Results for N = 2 • 30

  31. 31

  32. Questions • What happens when individuals only engage in partial sharing? • What rate of sharing does it take to achieve a higher growth rate? • To what extent does growth rate depend on the way resources are distributed? • Does any of the above depend on how noisy the system is? 32

  33. Finiteness of Time Length T • 33

  34. 34

  35. Questions • What happens when individuals only engage in partial sharing? • What rate of sharing does it take to achieve maximum growth rate? • To what extent does growth rate depend on the way resources are distributed? • Does any of the above depend on how noisy the system is? 35

  36. Fully Connected Graph for Different N • 36

  37. 37

  38. 38

  39. Fully Connected Graph for Different N • 39

  40. Form One Form Two • 40

  41. Form One Form Two • 41

  42. 42

  43. 43

  44. Similar Behaviour in Our Model • 44

  45. 45

  46. 46

  47. Questions • What happens when individuals only engage in partial sharing? • What rate of sharing does it take to achieve maximum growth rate? • To what extent does growth rate depend on the way resources are distributed? • Does any of the above depend on how noisy the system is? 47

  48. N-Cycle • 48

  49. 49

  50. • 50

  51. 51

  52. Questions • What happens when individuals only engage in partial sharing? • What rate of sharing does it take to achieve maximum growth rate? • To what extent does growth rate depend on the way resources are distributed? • Does any of the above depend on how noisy the system is? 52

  53. 53

  54. 54

  55. 55

  56. Conclusion • In the absence of fluctuations, there is no incentive to cooperate. • Even a little sharing goes a long way. • The manner of distribution does have an impact on the growth rate. 56

  57. Thank you for listening. • References: 1. “The Evolutionary Advantage of Cooperation”, O. Peters and A. Adamou http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.03414 “The Emergence and Growth of Complex Networks in Adaptive 2. Systems”, S. Jain and S. Krishna Computer Phys. Comm. 121-122 (1999) 116-121. 3. “Far from equilibrium: Wealth reallocation in the United States”, Y. Berman, O. Peters and A. Adamou http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.05631 “Note on mean-field wealth models and the Random Energy Model”, 4. Jean-Phillipe Bouchard (not published) 57

Recommend


More recommend