final year project presentation automatic piano tuning
play

FINAL YEAR PROJECT PRESENTATION Automatic Piano Tuning Presented - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

American University of Beirut Faculty of Engineering and Architecture Mechanical Engineering Department FINAL YEAR PROJECT PRESENTATION Automatic Piano Tuning Presented By: Tilbian, Joseph Matossian, Garo Project Supervisor: Prof. A Smaili


  1. American University of Beirut Faculty of Engineering and Architecture Mechanical Engineering Department FINAL YEAR PROJECT PRESENTATION

  2. Automatic Piano Tuning Presented By: Tilbian, Joseph Matossian, Garo Project Supervisor: Prof. A Smaili

  3. Introduction and Problem Statement • Piano tuning, an art and a profession • The “Automatic Piano Tuner” • A precision instrument to tune a piano • No Prior knowledge about tuning needed • Easy to handle • Markets for such an instrument • Household Use • Piano Manufacturing Companies

  4. Literature Review • The Nature of Sound and Music Theory • The Harmonic Series •The Equal Temperament • Tuning Instruments • Design Considerations

  5. Literature Review • The Nature of Sound and Music Theory • The Musical Scale • The Interval

  6. Literature Review The Nature of Sound and Music Theory

  7. Literature Review The Nature of Sound and Music Theory

  8. Literature Review The Harmonic Series

  9. Literature Review The Harmonic Series

  10. Literature Review The Equal Temperament

  11. Literature Review The Equal Temperament • The Ratio between two consecutive semi-tones is 1.0594631

  12. Literature Review Tuning Instruments Auto Chromatic Tuners

  13. Literature Review Tuning Instruments Strobotuners

  14. Literature Review • Design Considerations • Design of an Instrument that hears, analyses, and controls • The Microphone • The Micro Controller • The Tuning Gun

  15. Proposed Solution Procedure • Closed Loop Feedback Control System • The Microphone and Interface Circuit • The Micro Controller • The Tuning Gun

  16. Proposed Solution Procedure Closed Loop Feedback Control System

  17. The Sample Scale

  18. Proposed Solution Procedure • The Microphone and Interface Circuit • Piezoelectric Microphone • Low Noise Dual Pre-Amp IC ( LM387A)

  19. Proposed Solution Procedure The Microphone

  20. Proposed Solution Procedure The Microphone

  21. Proposed Solution Procedure The Microphone

  22. Proposed Solution Procedure • The Micro Controller • Sequence of Events • Capture and Compare Module • Tuning Gun Control • LCD Control

  23. Proposed Solution Procedure The Micro Controller • Sequence of Events • Instrument turned on, welcome message displayed • Note to be tuned displayed • User can scroll up and down the scale • User can tune a selected note by pressing a button • User alerted when note is being tuned and tuned • Note tuned next note in the scale is displayed •Sequence repeated until all notes are tuned

  24. Proposed Solution Procedure The Micro Controller • Capture and Compare Module • Measure the period of the acoustic signal • Compare the period of the captured signal to a reference value • If values match, note is in tune • If values are not equal, Motor activated • Capture and compare module repeated until values match.

  25. Proposed Solution Procedure The Micro Controller - Capture and Compare

  26. Proposed Solution Procedure The Micro Controller - Capture and Compare

  27. Proposed Solution Procedure The Micro Controller - Capture and Compare

  28. Proposed Solution Procedure The Micro Controller - Capture and Compare

  29. Proposed Solution Procedure The Micro Controller - Capture and Compare • Capture the signal from falling edge to falling edge • Allocate memory locations • Capture and compare

  30. Proposed Solution Procedure The Micro Controller - Capture and Compare

  31. Proposed Solution Procedure The Micro Controller - Capture and Compare

  32. Proposed Solution Procedure The Micro Controller - Capture and Compare

  33. Proposed Solution Procedure The Micro Controller - Capture and Compare If CCPRESH < CCPVALH, this implies that the frequency of the processed signal is higher than that of the preset value. The controller should rotate the motor counter-clockwise to decrease the frequency of the string. If CCPRESH > CCPVALH, this implies that the frequency of the processed signal is lower than that of the preset value. The controller should rotate the motor clockwise to increase the frequency of the string. If CCPRESH = CCPVALH, this implies that we have to compare the lower bytes.

  34. Proposed Solution Procedure The Micro Controller - Capture and Compare If CCPRESL < CCPVALL, this implies that the frequency of the processed signal is higher than that of the preset value. The controller should rotate the motor counter-clockwise to decrease the frequency of the string. If CCPRESL > CCPVALL, this implies that the frequency of the processed signal is lower than that of the preset value. The controller should rotate the motor clockwise to increase the frequency of the string. If CCPRESL = CCPVALL, this implies that the string has been tuned to the desired frequency, and we can move to tuning another string.

  35. Proposed Solution Procedure The Micro Controller - Capture and Compare • Case of notes bellow 76.1788 Hz • Addition of a Prescaler

  36. Proposed Solution Procedure The Micro Controller • Tuning Gun Control • Control a DC motor by a Dual H-Bridge Drive (L298N) • Direction of motor decided by the result of the comparison. • Direction Control by 3 Pins

  37. Proposed Solution Procedure The Micro Controller • LCD Control • 2 lines , 20 characters • Controlled by 11 pins • The LCD guides the user

  38. Proposed Solution Procedure • The Tuning Gun • The Torque • The Rotational Speed • The Motor • Worm Gearing • The Tuning Tool

  39. Proposed Solution Procedure The Tuning Gun - The Torque The Torque Wrench

  40. Proposed Solution Procedure The Tuning Gun - The Torque

  41. Proposed Solution Procedure The Tuning Gun - The Rotational Speed

  42. Proposed Solution Procedure The Tuning Gun - The Rotational Speed

  43. Proposed Solution Procedure The Tuning Gun - The Rotational Speed

  44. Proposed Solution Procedure The Tuning Gun - The Tuning Tool

  45. Proposed Solution Procedure The Tuning Gun - The Motor

  46. Proposed Solution Procedure The Tuning Gun - Worm Gearing

  47. Proposed Solution Procedure The Tuning Gun

  48. Results and Discussion Packaging

  49. Results and Discussion Packaging

  50. Results and Discussion Packaging

  51. Results and Discussion • How to use the instrument • How to use the tuning gun

  52. Results and Discussion • Manufacturing Considerations

  53. Conclusion • Revolutionize the art of tuning pianos • Modeled to tune any acoustic or electric musical instrument

  54. Automatic Piano Tuning Thank You!

Recommend


More recommend