FINAL PRESENTATION SENIOR DESIGN P14315 UNIVERSAL PUMP DATA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

FINAL PRESENTATION SENIOR DESIGN P14315 UNIVERSAL PUMP DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM

WELCOME  Intro  Agenda Overview  Meet the Team  Project Description  Background  Customer Needs MSD 1  Engineering Requirements  System Overview and Summary  Budget  Project Plan  Concepts  Controller Selection  Analysis Selection  Testing Results MSD 2  Lessons Learned  Future Work and Recommendations  Final Questions

PROJECT BACKGROUND Pulsafeeder Inc. needed more efficient methods to collect data on their various pumping lines. Troubleshooting a failure with a lack of vital data, such as flow, pressure, and efficiency, can lead to long Design Reviews that can ultimately bypass the primary issues. This system would allow Pulsafeeder to acquire vital pump metrics and see when & where preventative maintenance is required to prolong the life of the pump.

CUSTOMER NEEDS • Monitor Pump Metrics • Pressure, Flow, Temperature, Power • Monitor Motor Metrics • Voltage, Amperage, Power, Efficiency • Preventative and Reactive Shut Down Procedures • Display and Record Data • Mobile Solution • Incorporate “Off the Shelf” Solutions

SYSTEM OVERVIEW

ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS

BUDGET Group Name Description Cost Enclosure - $461.72 Sensors Group Flow, Temp, Pressure $ 7,721.15 Electrical PLC, SmartRail, Wire $2898.84 Flow Loop ½ piping, Cart, Valves $1015.66 Emergency Stop Box, Button, Enclosure $761.15 1” Piping & Valves Research and Development $1107.53 Project Total Cost $13995.27 Budget $15700.00 Remaining $1704.73

PROJECT PLAN

MSD I Design

MSD II Build

CONTROLLER SELECTION Micro cro Featur ures es SBC DSP PC PC PLC Control troller er Number er of I/O O Port rts + + - + Confi figur gurabil ility ty Same Same Same Same Avail ilabil ility ty + - + Same Dis isplay - - Same Same Stora orage ge - - - Same Reso sour urces es Available + - Same Same Datu tum Ease se of Program ogrammi ming ng - - Same - Ease se of Debug uggin ging Same - Same + Cost st Same - - - 3+ 3+ 1+ 1+ 1+ 2+ Tota tal 3- 7- 3- 2- Net: t: 0 Net: t: -6 Net: t: -2 Net: t: 0 Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) picked above a Single Board Computer (SBC) and Microcontroller due to customer’s familiarity with PLCs. PLCs are also known to be highly robust and widely used in this type of industry.

FINAL DESIGN

TESTING RESULTS • Currently undergoing testing • Completed: • Temperature • Pressure • Flow • Power • PLC • E-Stop • Enclosure • Complete by end of week

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE • Integrate with Pump/Motor Controller • Add networking capabilities for accessing data • Integrate ability to automatically produce flow curves • Add additional sensors such as vibration sensing • Integrate sensors inside pump • Send text/SMS notifications when attention is needed

LESSONS LEARNED • Just because it is the industry standard, doesn’t mean that it is the easiest to learn/implement or most cost effective solution • Right tool for the right job • Co-oping with Senior Design makes your contributions less visible • Open choices for programming languages would be nice • Don’t box yourself in because of your major • Document Everything • Google Drive utilization allows for multiple people to collaborate at the same time

QUESTIONS

THANK YOU • PULSAFEEDER • LEO FARNAND • JOHN CONDAME • RIT FACULTY AND STAFF