extremally disconnected topological groups
play

Extremally disconnected topological groups Ulises Ariet RAMOS-GARC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TOPOSYM 2016 Extremally disconnected topological groups Ulises Ariet RAMOS-GARC IA Centro de Ciencias Matem aticas, UNAM ariet@matmor.unam.mx July 28 Prague, Czech Republic U. A. Ramos-Garc a (CCM-UNAM) ED groups July 2016 1 /


  1. TOPOSYM 2016 Extremally disconnected topological groups Ulises Ariet RAMOS-GARC´ IA Centro de Ciencias Matem´ aticas, UNAM ariet@matmor.unam.mx July 28 Prague, Czech Republic U. A. Ramos-Garc´ ıa (CCM-UNAM) ED groups July 2016 1 / 20

  2. Contents Arhangel’skii’s problem 1 RO ( X ) and Cohen reals 2 Algebraic free sequences and rapid ultrafilters 3 ED group topologies on B ( ω 1 ) 4 U. A. Ramos-Garc´ ıa (CCM-UNAM) ED groups July 2016 2 / 20

  3. The problem Problem (Arhangel’skii, 1967) Is there a nondiscrete extremally disconnected topological group? Definition (Stone, 1937) A topological space is called extremally disconnected (or ED for short) if it is regular and the closure of every open set is open, or equivalently, the closures of any two disjoint open sets are disjoint. U. A. Ramos-Garc´ ıa (CCM-UNAM) ED groups July 2016 3 / 20

  4. The problem Problem (Arhangel’skii, 1967) Is there a nondiscrete extremally disconnected topological group? Definition (Stone, 1937) A topological space is called extremally disconnected (or ED for short) if it is regular and the closure of every open set is open, or equivalently, the closures of any two disjoint open sets are disjoint. U. A. Ramos-Garc´ ıa (CCM-UNAM) ED groups July 2016 3 / 20

  5. The problem Problem (Arhangel’skii, 1967) Is there a nondiscrete extremally disconnected topological group? Definition (Stone, 1937) A topological space is called extremally disconnected (or ED for short) if it is regular and the closure of every open set is open, or equivalently, the closures of any two disjoint open sets are disjoint. U. A. Ramos-Garc´ ıa (CCM-UNAM) ED groups July 2016 3 / 20

  6. Elementary facts about ED spaces Every ED space is zero-dimensional. Every open (or dense) subspace of an ED space is also an ED space. Extremal disconnectedness is preserved under open continuous surjec- tion maps. Every discrete space is ED, but the converse is not true ( e.g., βω ). Every sequence in an ED space is trivial. In particular, every metrizable ED space is discrete. Extremal disconnectedness can be considered as a non-trivial generaliza- tion of discreteness . This notion has been studied by many authors for several years. U. A. Ramos-Garc´ ıa (CCM-UNAM) ED groups July 2016 4 / 20

  7. Elementary facts about ED spaces Every ED space is zero-dimensional. Every open (or dense) subspace of an ED space is also an ED space. Extremal disconnectedness is preserved under open continuous surjec- tion maps. Every discrete space is ED, but the converse is not true ( e.g., βω ). Every sequence in an ED space is trivial. In particular, every metrizable ED space is discrete. Extremal disconnectedness can be considered as a non-trivial generaliza- tion of discreteness . This notion has been studied by many authors for several years. U. A. Ramos-Garc´ ıa (CCM-UNAM) ED groups July 2016 4 / 20

  8. Elementary facts about ED spaces Every ED space is zero-dimensional. Every open (or dense) subspace of an ED space is also an ED space. Extremal disconnectedness is preserved under open continuous surjec- tion maps. Every discrete space is ED, but the converse is not true ( e.g., βω ). Every sequence in an ED space is trivial. In particular, every metrizable ED space is discrete. Extremal disconnectedness can be considered as a non-trivial generaliza- tion of discreteness . This notion has been studied by many authors for several years. U. A. Ramos-Garc´ ıa (CCM-UNAM) ED groups July 2016 4 / 20

  9. Elementary facts about ED spaces Every ED space is zero-dimensional. Every open (or dense) subspace of an ED space is also an ED space. Extremal disconnectedness is preserved under open continuous surjec- tion maps. Every discrete space is ED, but the converse is not true ( e.g., βω ). Every sequence in an ED space is trivial. In particular, every metrizable ED space is discrete. Extremal disconnectedness can be considered as a non-trivial generaliza- tion of discreteness . This notion has been studied by many authors for several years. U. A. Ramos-Garc´ ıa (CCM-UNAM) ED groups July 2016 4 / 20

  10. Elementary facts about ED spaces Every ED space is zero-dimensional. Every open (or dense) subspace of an ED space is also an ED space. Extremal disconnectedness is preserved under open continuous surjec- tion maps. Every discrete space is ED, but the converse is not true ( e.g., βω ). Every sequence in an ED space is trivial. In particular, every metrizable ED space is discrete. Extremal disconnectedness can be considered as a non-trivial generaliza- tion of discreteness . This notion has been studied by many authors for several years. U. A. Ramos-Garc´ ıa (CCM-UNAM) ED groups July 2016 4 / 20

  11. Elementary facts about ED spaces Every ED space is zero-dimensional. Every open (or dense) subspace of an ED space is also an ED space. Extremal disconnectedness is preserved under open continuous surjec- tion maps. Every discrete space is ED, but the converse is not true ( e.g., βω ). Every sequence in an ED space is trivial. In particular, every metrizable ED space is discrete. Extremal disconnectedness can be considered as a non-trivial generaliza- tion of discreteness . This notion has been studied by many authors for several years. U. A. Ramos-Garc´ ıa (CCM-UNAM) ED groups July 2016 4 / 20

  12. Elementary facts about ED spaces Every ED space is zero-dimensional. Every open (or dense) subspace of an ED space is also an ED space. Extremal disconnectedness is preserved under open continuous surjec- tion maps. Every discrete space is ED, but the converse is not true ( e.g., βω ). Every sequence in an ED space is trivial. In particular, every metrizable ED space is discrete. Extremal disconnectedness can be considered as a non-trivial generaliza- tion of discreteness . This notion has been studied by many authors for several years. U. A. Ramos-Garc´ ıa (CCM-UNAM) ED groups July 2016 4 / 20

  13. Elementary facts about ED spaces Every ED space is zero-dimensional. Every open (or dense) subspace of an ED space is also an ED space. Extremal disconnectedness is preserved under open continuous surjec- tion maps. Every discrete space is ED, but the converse is not true ( e.g., βω ). Every sequence in an ED space is trivial. In particular, every metrizable ED space is discrete. Extremal disconnectedness can be considered as a non-trivial generaliza- tion of discreteness . This notion has been studied by many authors for several years. U. A. Ramos-Garc´ ıa (CCM-UNAM) ED groups July 2016 4 / 20

  14. Elementary facts about ED spaces Every ED space is zero-dimensional. Every open (or dense) subspace of an ED space is also an ED space. Extremal disconnectedness is preserved under open continuous surjec- tion maps. Every discrete space is ED, but the converse is not true ( e.g., βω ). Every sequence in an ED space is trivial. In particular, every metrizable ED space is discrete. Extremal disconnectedness can be considered as a non-trivial generaliza- tion of discreteness . This notion has been studied by many authors for several years. U. A. Ramos-Garc´ ıa (CCM-UNAM) ED groups July 2016 4 / 20

  15. Consistent examples Partial positive solutions For each one of the following assumptions, there is an example answering Arhangel’skii’s question: (Sirota, 1969/Louveau, 1972) There is a selective ultrafilter on ω . (Malykhin,1975) p = c . These group topologies are on the countable Boolean group ([ ω ] <ω , ∆). In fact, Arhangel’skii’s question can be reduced to the Boolean case. Theorem (Malykhin, 1975) Any ED topological group must contain an open (and therefore closed) Boolean subgroup (i.e., a subgroup consisting of elements of order 2). U. A. Ramos-Garc´ ıa (CCM-UNAM) ED groups July 2016 5 / 20

  16. Consistent examples Partial positive solutions For each one of the following assumptions, there is an example answering Arhangel’skii’s question: (Sirota, 1969/Louveau, 1972) There is a selective ultrafilter on ω . (Malykhin,1975) p = c . These group topologies are on the countable Boolean group ([ ω ] <ω , ∆). In fact, Arhangel’skii’s question can be reduced to the Boolean case. Theorem (Malykhin, 1975) Any ED topological group must contain an open (and therefore closed) Boolean subgroup (i.e., a subgroup consisting of elements of order 2). U. A. Ramos-Garc´ ıa (CCM-UNAM) ED groups July 2016 5 / 20

  17. Consistent examples Partial positive solutions For each one of the following assumptions, there is an example answering Arhangel’skii’s question: (Sirota, 1969/Louveau, 1972) There is a selective ultrafilter on ω . (Malykhin,1975) p = c . These group topologies are on the countable Boolean group ([ ω ] <ω , ∆). In fact, Arhangel’skii’s question can be reduced to the Boolean case. Theorem (Malykhin, 1975) Any ED topological group must contain an open (and therefore closed) Boolean subgroup (i.e., a subgroup consisting of elements of order 2). U. A. Ramos-Garc´ ıa (CCM-UNAM) ED groups July 2016 5 / 20

Recommend


More recommend