experimental study of free gainsn jet in m tor
play

Experimental Study of Free GaInSn Jet in M-TOR Xiaoyong Luo (UCLA) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Experimental Study of Free GaInSn Jet in M-TOR Xiaoyong Luo (UCLA) Presented at APEX Electronic Meeting February 5, 2002 OUTLINE Introduction Experimental Facility Description of Test Article Magnetic Field of the Flux


  1. Experimental Study of Free GaInSn Jet in M-TOR Xiaoyong Luo (UCLA) Presented at APEX Electronic Meeting February 5, 2002

  2. OUTLINE • Introduction • Experimental Facility • Description of Test Article • Magnetic Field of the Flux Concentrator • Numerical Simulation • Conclusions -1-

  3. Experimental Facility Ga Inlet Flow Meter 1. Magnetic Torus Liquid Metal MHD flow test facility (MTOR) • 24 electromagnets arranged in a magnetic torus geometry, a 3400A/180V DC power Iron block supply, and a 16 liter actively pumped Ga-In- Concentrator Sn flow loop • At a maximum current of 3400A, the field strength is about 0.6T at inboard Circle disk Concentrator 2. A Magnetic field concentrator is Supporter added into the facility (M-TOR) to increase the local field strength 3. Flow meter diagnostic -2- Argon Gas Ga Outlet

  4. Main Test Article Description 1. The test article is composed of 3 sections 5mm (1) A nozzle to provide a 5mm round jet Nozzle (2)A transparent enclosure to prevent Ga oxidation Transparent (3)A cone-shape receiver to minimize splashing area 2. Experiments have been conducted in two test articles configurations • a circular version • a rectangular version Cone- shape Unit: mm -3-

  5. Flux Concentrator Assembly Iron Block • The concentrator assembly includes a pair of large iron Slots circle disks (not shown), which grasp the flux and redistribute it into a small iron block • The field strength depends on the distance between the pair Unit: mm -4-

  6. Magnetic Field Strength inside the Flux Concentrator Maximum Point • The magnetic field increases as the current passing through the coils increases Maximum Gradient • A Gauss meter is used to measure the field strength at 7 locations • The maximum magnetic field is ~ 1.1T • The maximum gradient of the magnetic field is ~ 10T/m Note: Distance means distance away from the edge of the concentrator -5-

  7. Video 1 for Round Test Article • Most of the view is blocked by the iron flux concentrator. Only flow outside the edge of the concentrator can be seen. • The Maximum Magnetic Field is ~ 1.1T( at the midplane of the concentrator) • A gradient exists between the inside and outside of the concentrator. A gradient of 33T/m is detected -6-

  8. Video 2 for Rectangular Test Article • The Maximum Magnetic Field at the midplane is ~ 0.9T at 2600A • The gradient is ~ 10T/m • Slots were cut in the iron concentrator along the gradient region to provide jet deflection measurements • The jet location is indicated by the bright spot (jet can not be seen) -7-

  9. Numerical Simulation • Governing Equations → ∂ Momentum → → → → → 1 U + ∇ = −∇ + ∆ + × ( U . ) U p U N ( j B ) Equation ∂ t Re Maxwell’s → ∂ → B Equations → → ∇ × = − E ∇ × = B j ∂ t Ohm’s Law → → → → conservation law → = σ + ×   j E U B ∇ ⋅ = 0 j     Poisson Equation → → ∇ φ = ∇ ⋅ × 2 ( U B ) -8-

  10. Numerical Simulation • Numerical Methods Key Points : (1) An iterative computation → → →  − 1 1   to Ohm’s law was applied ∇ φ + = ∇ ⋅ × −  ∇ ⋅ 2 1 n n n n U B 1 j     σ ε   and a Poisson equation of     the scalar potential was → → → → adopted in the numerical + + = − ε + εσ −∇ φ + × n 1 n n 1 n n ( 1 ) ( ) j j U B procedure . (2) Two-order central → → difference scheme was + − n 1 n j j used. (3) VOF method was used Convergence critical ≤ − 3 1 e → to track free surface. + n 1 j -9-

  11. Computational Results • Ga inlet velocity V=10m/s is10m/s • A constant magnetic field of 0.9T is assigned T=0.9T 5cm for the first 5cm, followed by a field gradient of 10T/m for the rest of 10cm 10cm g • Computation domain is 15cm × 2cm × 6cm ( about 70,000 meshes) T’=10 T/m 3-Dimensional Velocity Profile -10-

  12. X-direction Velocity Contours t=0.01s t=0.015s t=0.025s t=0.02s -11-

  13. Conclusions 1. Numerical simulation predicts a strong MHD effect. Jet deflects more than experimental observation. Near-term effort is to resolve this discrepancy. 2. Diagnostics for measuring jet deflection will be improved -12-

Recommend


More recommend