experience with a
play

Experience with a standards based product data collaboration hub - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Experience with a standards based product data collaboration hub Nigel Shaw, Eurostep Limited C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P Eurostep history on a page Thing test [1:1] test [1:1] 2008 role_name [1:1] CAR SHIP string


  1. Experience with a standards based product data collaboration hub Nigel Shaw, Eurostep Limited C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P

  2. Eurostep history on a page Thing test [1:1] test [1:1] 2008 role_name [1:1] CAR SHIP string 2001 Share-A-space ISO 10303 2000 Thing test [1:1] test [1:1] role_name [1:1] CAR SHIP string 1994 C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P

  3. Original idea: OEM/Supplier networks Supplier Supplier Module supplier Supplier Supplier Module supplier Module supplier Development partner OEM Module supplier Development partner OEM Module supplier Joint venture R & D Module supplier Supplier Supplier Joint venture R & D Supplier Module supplier OEM 1 Module supplier Supplier Supplier Supplier Module supplier Development partner Supplier OEM OEM 2 Module supplier Joint venture R & D Module supplier Supplier Supplier Extended enterprise PDM OEM 3 Supplier Homogeneous systems/data C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P

  4. Principles of synchronization » Separate systems joined in point-to-point transfer + Low initial cost for integration + Best of breed system selection − Impossible configuration management, tracing, etc − No information control and assurance » Single system environment + Configuration management, tracing, etc − High initial cost − No room for best of breed − Impossible to impose in collaboration, e.g. back to #1 » Separate systems joined via information hub + Configuration management, tracing, etc + Low initial cost + Information control and assurance also across the EE + Best of breed system selection C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P

  5. Lead customer – Offset manufacturing Into Switzerland – Portal role • Combat Vehicle Military Vehicle • Turnover 2,5m € • 1100 employees • 95 % export • Offset Value ≥ Order Value • Results in local Manufacturing (Numbers from 2005) All Terrain Vehicle Future Products C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P

  6. Volvo Deutz – engine supply Deutz Deutz Service Sales dept After-Sales Deutz KLU Design dept ETL ETL SBS BS BS BS P1 P1 P3 P3 P4 P4 SL SL BS BS SL SL P3 P1 P2 C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P

  7. Challenge » Volvo often had outdated and non-consolidated product data, leading to inefficient information management − Difficult and time consuming to get the right data − High percentage of the spare parts where erroneously returned – internally called ”Parts tourism” − High risk of design errors due to outdated third party information − Time consuming to produce a correct parts catalogue C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P

  8. Use of cross-function consolidation BS SL SL KLU SL SL Design SBS BS BS P2 P3 P1 BS BS BS SL SL KLU ETL ETL SL SL P1 P3 P3 P4 P4 P5 SBS BS BS P3 P1 P2 Sales BS BS ETL ETL P1 P3 P3 P4 P4 P5 Service C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P

  9. Information Assets in Heterogeneous Environment Require Design Make Support Mainteneance Supplier Supplier System User C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P

  10. Change in Heterogeneous Environment Require Design Make Support Mainteneance Supplier Supplier System User C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P

  11. Design change consequence analysis Product Variant Line Replace Unit Product Design View Support Item Design View Where Used Document Change Request Physical Item Swing axle Part No 1 2273-001 Support System In-Service View Item Structure Product In-Service View Vehicles LRU Spare Parts Support Item Design View Product Design View Maintenance Equipment Spare Parts Design Parts Maintenance Equipment C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P

  12. “Standards” Excel/CSV C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P

  13. ”LSAR” BAAN Life*S1000D Matrix 2. Tasks & 4. Provisioning data modules 3. Product structure 1. LCN & tasks 4. LCN to provisioning 1388-2B.dat 5. Provisioning data Information integration: Example Information hub Joint development with C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P

  14. “Systems” C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P

  15. Rich Business Object Model in Share-A-space Location Systems Functions Product Product-as-realized Requirement Item Product/Part Physical Documents Zones Engineering Change Order Work Order Work Request Support System Engineering Change Proposal Condition State Definition Scheme State Observed Resource Tools Type of Person Managed Resource Task Requirement Location Type of Person Qualification Definition Concept Design Development Production In-Service C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P

  16. Design Data from approved TDP C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P

  17. Now compared to the OEM data C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P

  18. Comparator explained Same product – different version As-designed compared to as-used-to-manufacture Symbols show agreement (or lack of agreement) with another product structure from a different source C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P

  19. Product as realized User name here Navigating Product-as-realized structure C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P

  20. Using SharePoint to access data held in Share-A-space C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P

  21. C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P

  22. Summary » Collaborations have their own master data » Controlled consolidation is vital to maintain consistency » The standards (AP214 & PLCS) provide a rich data model − no need to configure the content model − But it will expose data quality issues » Collaboration should not replace existing tools » Web services provide the ideal way to enable interaction − And business intelligent applications » PLM needs data orchestration to make SOA practical ”There is no doubt that Share -A-space holds the keys to a number of different and difficult extended enterprise information integration, consolidation and exchange issues.” – CIMdata 2007 C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P

  23. What is collaboration? Getting everyone to work Allowing partners to do in the same process? what they do best? » Agreed by all? » Consistent data across » Across tools and diverse tools and organizations organizations? C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P

  24. Questions? www.eurostep.com C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P

Recommend


More recommend