existence of minimisers in the plateau problem
play

Existence of Minimisers in the Plateau Problem Anthony Salib - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Existence of Minimisers in the Plateau Problem Anthony Salib 09/04/2020 The Plateau Problem Given a boundary in R n , does there exist a surface that is bounded by such that the area of it is minimal. The Plateau Problem Given a boundary


  1. Existence of Minimisers in the Plateau Problem Anthony Salib 09/04/2020

  2. The Plateau Problem Given a boundary Γ in R n , does there exist a surface that is bounded by Γ such that the area of it is minimal.

  3. The Plateau Problem Given a boundary Γ in R n , does there exist a surface that is bounded by Γ such that the area of it is minimal.

  4. Sets of finite perimeter We have the following Plateau type problem in some A ⊂ R n with boundary data E 0 , γ = inf { P ( E ) : E \ A = E 0 \ A , P ( E ) < ∞} .

  5. Sets of finite perimeter γ = inf { P ( E ) : E \ A = E 0 \ A , P ( E ) < ∞} . The existence of minimisers can be established using the direct method: Construct a minimising sequence { E h } h ∈ N Extract a convergent subsequence, E h k → E Show that P ( E ) = γ

  6. ”Area” For a k -dimensional set, M ⊂ R n we settle on the k -dimensional Hausdorff measure as our area functional. That is � d H k . A ( M ) = M

  7. ”Bounded by” We will take bounded by Γ to mean that the surface Σ satisfies ∂ Σ = Γ.

  8. Surface ?

  9. Outline Submanifolds Currents Varifolds

  10. Submanifolds How can we tell if a given submanifold M ⊂ R n has minimal area?

  11. Monotonicity and Density Theorem (Monotonicity) Suppose M, k-dimensional, is stationary in R n and fix x ∈ R n . Then ω − 1 k r − k A ( M ∩ B r ( x )) is an increasing function of r for 0 < r ≤ dist ( x , ∂ M ) . We define the density of M at p ∈ M \ ∂ M to be r → 0 ω − 1 k r − k A ( M ∩ B r ( x )) . Θ( M , p ) = lim

  12. The disk with Spines Figure: A minimising sequence may not converge to a Minimal Surface

  13. Fleming’s Example Figure: A minimal surface with infinite genus

  14. Currents Let U ⊂ R n and we let D k ( U ) denote the space of compactly supported k -forms on U . Definition (Currents) A k -current is a linear functional on D k ( U ). The space of k -currents, we will denote as D k ( U ). Given T ∈ D k ( U ), the boundary is defined to be ∂ T ∈ D k − 1 such that for any ω ∈ D k − 1 ( U ) ∂ T ( ω ) = T ( d ω ) .

  15. Mass of Currents Definition (Mass) Given a current T , we define it’s mass to be M ( T ) = sup T ( ω ) . � ω �≤ 1

  16. Currents Theorem The space of currents with finite mass is a Banach space with norm M .

  17. Plateau Problem Given a k -current S with ∂ S = ∅ , is there a k + 1-current T such that ∂ T = S and M ( T ) is minimal.

  18. Rectifiable Integer Currents Definition Let U ⊂ R n . A rectifiable integer k -current (integral k -current)is a current T such that for ω ∈ D k ( U ) � < ω ( x ) , ξ ( x ) > θ ( x ) d H k ( x ) , T ( ω ) = M where M ⊂ U is countably k -rectifiable, θ is a H k integrable function that takes values positive integers and ξ : M → (Λ k ( R n )) ∗ is H k measurable which can be expressed at almost every point x , ξ ( x ) = τ 1 ∧ · · · ∧ τ n where τ 1 , . . . , τ n is an orthonormal basis for the approximate tangent plane. θ is called the multiplicity and ξ is called the orientation.

  19. Federer and Fleming Compactness Theorem Theorem (Federer and Flemming Compactness Theorem) If { T j } ⊂ D k ( U ) is a sequence of integral currents with sup( M W ( T j ) + M W ( ∂ T j )) < ∞ for all W ⊂⊂ U, then { T j } is sequentially compact.

  20. Plateau Problem Given an integral k -current S and ∂ S = ∅ , is there an integral k + 1-current T such that ∂ T = S and M ( T ) is minimal.

  21. Mobius band Figure: Not every minimal surface is orientable

  22. Rectifiable Varifolds Let M be a countably k -rectifiable subset of R n and θ be a locally H k -integrable function on M . The rectifiable n -varifold v( M , θ ) is the set of all equivalence classes of ( M , θ ), where ( M , θ ) ≡ ( N , φ ) if H k (( M \ N ) ∪ ( N \ M )) = 0 and φ = θ H k -a.e on M ∩ N . θ is called the multiplicity function. If it is integer valued we will call V an integral varifold.

  23. Rectifiable Varifolds We associate to a varifold V = v( M , θ ) the Radon measure µ V such that for any H k measurable set A , � θ d H k . µ V ( A ) = A ∩ M The mass of a varifold V is M ( V ) = µ V ( R n ) . We say that V k → V if µ V k → µ V .

  24. General Varifolds We define the Grassmannian, G ( k , n ) to be the collection of all k -dimensional subsets of R n . Given some A ⊂ R n , we define G k ( A ) = A × G ( n , k ) , with the product metric. Definition (General Varifold) An k -varifold is a Radon measure on G k ( R n ).

  25. General Varifolds Given a k -varifold V on G k U , there is an associated Radon measure µ V on U (weight of V) defined for A ⊂ U as µ V ( A ) = V ( π − 1 ( A )) . The mass of the varifold is M ( V ) = µ V ( U ) = V ( G k ( U )) .

  26. First Variation δ V ( X ) = d � dt M ( φ t # ( V G k ( K ))) | t =0 = div S XdV ( x , S ) . G k ( U ) (1) V is stationary if δ V ( X ) = 0 for all X : U → R n continuous and compactly supported.

  27. Monotonicity Theorem (Monotonicity) Suppose V is stationary in U, then r − n µ V ( B r ( x )) is increasing for 0 < r < dist ( x , ∂ U ) .

  28. Density Definition (Density) Let V be stationary in U . The density for x ∈ U is defined to be Θ k ( µ V , x ) = ω − 1 k r − k µ V ( B r ( x )) � r − n − 2 | p S ⊥ ( y − x ) | 2 dV ( y , S ) , − ω − 1 k G k ( B r ( x )) for 0 < r < dist ( x , ∂ U ).

  29. Rectifiability Theorem (Rectifiability) Suppose V has locally bounded first variation in U and that Θ k ( µ V , x ) > 0 for µ V -a.e. x ∈ U. Then V is a k-rectifiable varifold.

  30. Compactness Theorem (Compactness for Rectifiable Varifolds) Suppose { V j } j ∈ N is a sequence of rectifiable varifolds that have bounded first variation in U, Θ k ( µ V j , x ) ≥ 1 in U and that sup( µ V j ( U ) + � δ V j � ( U )) < ∞ . Then { V j } j ∈ N is sequentially compact and Θ k ( µ V , x ) ≥ 1 .

Recommend


More recommend