enhancing grant making to the
play

Enhancing Grant-making to the LGBT+ Community & Voluntary - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Enhancing Grant-making to the LGBT+ Community & Voluntary Sector Introducing ourselves Heather Salmon, Funding Officer, Esme Fairbairn Foundation Joanne Raw, Funding Manager, National Lottery Community Fund Paul Roberts,


  1. Enhancing Grant-making to the LGBT+ Community & Voluntary Sector

  2. Introducing ourselves • Heather Salmon, Funding Officer, Esmée Fairbairn Foundation • Joanne Raw, Funding Manager, National Lottery Community Fund • Paul Roberts, Consortium • Maria Antoniou, Consortium • Your name, role & organisation?

  3. Background • The LGBT Funding Project supported by Esmée Fairbairn Foundation & National Lottery Fund • To explore potential for a sector-wide funding model “how can we increase, enhance and sustain income to the LGBT+ sector?” and support LGBT+ groups to fundraise 1) Consultation with o LGBT+ groups o LGBT+ donors o Grant-makers o Other stakeholders 2) Plus mapping existing models , feasibility of models, business planning … One of the models is an online giving / fundraising platform 3) Report to Consortium Trustees in April 4) Advisory Group to help develop chosen model and decide on Consortium’s role 5) Implementation & launch of model (future funding…)

  4. Background The grant- makers’ perspectives…

  5. Today’s Roundtable Session • Aims: o Share info & experiences of the LGBT+ sector community sector (questions encouraged) o Discuss ways of making LGBT+ community organisations stronger and more sustainable o Consider ways of increasing or enhancing support to the sector, including collaborative approaches

  6. About Consortium • Infrastructure and Membership organisation • UK’s largest network of LGBT+ groups, projects & organisations with 325 Members and growing… • Infrastructure support 1-2-1, training, resources, networks • Advocating & advising – Government LGBT+ Working Group • Grant-making – new LGBT+ Futures fund • Annual Insight survey – ‘state of the sector’ over last 5 years

  7. The LGBT+ Sector in the UK • 325 Members – Estimated 3,000+ LGBT+ groups in UK • Benefitting 4.5 million people – LGBT+ people, their friends & families (2018 Insight report) • Support, sports, youth, campaigning, older people, professional networks, arts, meetups… • 45 Trans groups in our Trans Organisations Network (400+ in UK, Tranzwiki) • 110 Members in London = 1/5 of LGBT+ groups in London • Number of ‘out’ LGBT+ people in the UK is increasing, but figures conflicting: • ONS, 2016: 1 million / 2 % of population is LGB (including 4.1% of 16-24 yr olds); euroClinix, 2018: 9 million / 13 % of population is LGB ( 24% of 18-24 year olds) • (‘Out’) Trans & gender non -conforming people = a rapidly growing population • GEO 2018: Up to 500k Trans people. ONS to include gender identity in 2021 census

  8. Funding the sector • Gradual increase in funding for LGBT+ causes globally, but also fluctuations • 1980s AIDS pandemic – funding for LGBT+ (MSM) projects in global North • 2016 Pulse nightclub shooting in Orlando • Funders for LGBTQ Issues, 2018 : 0.17% of foundation funding globally (in practice the global North), and 0.04% of government funding currently goes to LGBT issues • GrantNav , UK context, analysis of data to July 2018: • 41% of funders have funded LGBT+ projects; grants to LGBT+ projects • 0.2% of total grants awarded were to LGBT+ projects • Largest proportion ( 39%) of LGBT+ grants = £5-10k (89% of these from National Lottery Community Fund – largest funder on the site giving 66% of all grants) • Over last 10 years, giving to LGBT causes has risen but also fluctuated. 2008, 14 grants listed. Jan - Jul 2018 = 55 grants . 2016 peaked at 101 grants, fell to 88 in 2017 • Regional variations: Highest number of grants: 17% of grants went to North West ; 15% to London ; 10% to Scotland . • Lowest number of grants: South Central (1.5%), Northern Ireland (1.5%), East of England (2%).

  9. Insight survey: Group income?

  10. Insight survey: Main income source? NB: Small & medium sized groups are closer to their communities, so have a higher % of individual giving than larger orgs. 18% of participants had successfully run crowdfunding campaigns.

  11. Biggest challenge re. grants 60 50 40 Percent 30 20 10 0 We do not apply The time it takes to Having to educate Finding appropriate Costing out work Complicated A lack of reliable A lack of in-house Other - Please tell for any grant write a funding bid funders in LGBT funding and projects application evidence and fundraising skills us funding. issues and processes statistics terminology

  12. Reasons for being turned down

  13. Key challenges of LGBT+ groups Small groups with same challenges as all small groups… • Capacity & skills – particularly if volunteer-run • High demand on services • Covering core costs • Funding projects and services • Sustainability • Good governance • Recruiting trustees & other volunteers • Concerns about Brexit & funding cuts

  14. Key challenges of LGBT+ groups BUT also … • LGBT+ people continue to face discrimination in all spheres of life • Leads to… • LGBT+ groups reluctant to approach funders • Reluctance to make themselves visible and vulnerable • Find themselves ‘educating’ funders about needs • Some geographically concentrated, but largely dispersed across UK. So, disadvantaged in place-based funding initiatives.

  15. Focus groups with 44 LGBT+ groups • Asking about their fundraising and consulting on possible solutions • Trans groups: Mainly small, volunteer-run: ‘How do I ask for money?, ‘Where do we start’? ‘How do you open a dialogue with a potential funder?’, ‘How do we find funds?’ • LGBT+ groups of various sizes: “ We [as a sector] rely on the same 4- 5 funders that we know fund LGBT groups.” “Their [funders’] priorities often don’t match the work we see a need for in LGBT communities” “We need longer - term funding as our communities are harder to reach and ‘recruit’ to projects” “We take risks and develop innovative projects. We need funders to take a risk by funding us.”

  16. Howe & Frazer, ‘Strength in Numbers’ 2018 • Europe-wide study, for ILGA • LGBT+ organisations’ sustainability and resiliency is challenged by a lack of paid staff and lack of long-term and flexible funding • LGBT+ organisations undertake many activities, but the activities that are most likely to be fully funded do not align with activities they identify as priorities (most funded = HIV prevention, documenting human rights violations, legal work around LGBT+ rights), • LGBT+ organisations perceive that funding opportunities do not match their priorities (priorities = community organising e.g. campaigns against anti- LGBT+ policies, LGBT+ media, social services for LGBT+ people) • Organisations that focus on a subset of LGBT+ people are more likely to have smaller budgets and fewer paid staff e.g. trans, BAME, faith, older…

  17. Discussion… • In small groups of 3-4 consider: 1) What are your impressions, insights or experiences of the LGBT+ sector? e.g. groups you’ve funded, impressions of the material presented… 2) What’s the key question / challenge for your organisation re. funding LGBT+ groups? 3) How can current funders of LGBT+ work help other grant-makers to get on board? Write on post-it notes & then share your answers in your group.

  18. What can we do to increase or enhance support to the LGBT+ community & voluntary sector? Exploring potential models

  19. Small changes requested by groups Grant- makers’ websites & comms: • Say you welcome LGBT+ applications • Show examples of previous support for LGBT+ groups • Display your diversity & inclusion policies • Mention inclusion and inter-sectionality when inviting applications on broader themes e.g. older people, youth, mental health… Also: • Talk with / listen to LGBT+ groups • Reach out directly to LGBT+ groups and invite applications e.g. via Consortium • Keep a balance between geography-focused funding and communities of identity • Take more risks with innovative projects • Consider longer-term funding for LGBT+ and other hard to reach & engage groups • Specific LGBT+ funding streams welcome, but not essential

  20. Model: Accreditation scheme Could Consortium deliver an accreditation scheme for grant-makers that includes: • LGBT+ awareness raising for staff & boards • Help with inclusion & diversity statements • Help with communications materials e.g. websites • Help with monitoring & evaluation • Examples of good practice? Similar to Stonewall’s Diversity Champions scheme for employers; or LGBT Foundation’s Pride in Practice for healthcare sector

  21. Model: Community involvement Could a panel of Consortium Members help to: • Design grants criteria • Visit and assess projects • Design website & comms? There’s a community involvement pilot with young people in North London – supported by The Blagrave Trust and The Cripplegate Foundation.

  22. A Model: Grant- maker’s Network Based on the U.S. network: Funders for LGBTQ issues • Membership network for funders interested in LGBT+ issues • Special interest groups e.g. older LGBT+ people, BAME, trans groups… • Annual event – roundtable or day conference • Joint funding initiatives or joint awareness-raising campaigns • Resources – Best practice guides; briefings; e-news with info on the LGBT+ sector and funding to the sector

Recommend


More recommend