energy efficient transmission in 5g communications
play

Energy-Efficient Transmission in 5G Communications Jun Chen - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Energy-Efficient Transmission in 5G Communications Jun Chen National Instruments jun.chen@ni.com WInnComm, 2018 Jun Chen Energy-Efficient Transmission in 5G 1 / 16 Agenda Introduction to 5G New Radio Problems and Motivation Metrics of


  1. Energy-Efficient Transmission in 5G Communications Jun Chen National Instruments jun.chen@ni.com WInnComm, 2018 Jun Chen Energy-Efficient Transmission in 5G 1 / 16

  2. Agenda Introduction to 5G New Radio Problems and Motivation Metrics of Transmit Energy Efficiency Energy-Efficient 5G NR Systems with Adaptive Transmission Conclusions Jun Chen Energy-Efficient Transmission in 5G 2 / 16

  3. Introduction to 5G New Radio Use Cases Enhanced Mobile Broadband (eMBB): extremely fast data speeds Ultra Reliable and Low Latency Communications (URLLC): real-time services that requires ultra low latency and prompt responses Massive Machine-Type Communications (mMTC): million IoT devices within 1 km 2 can be connected Massive MIMO and Beamforming From 2/4/8 to massive number of antennas 16, 32, even 256 or 1024 Benefits: capacity gains, spectral efficiency, and energy efficiency Support up to 8 layers for SU-MIMO and up to 12 layers for MU-MIMO More accurate channel state information (CSI) feedback: type I and type II CSI Jun Chen Energy-Efficient Transmission in 5G 3 / 16

  4. Problems and Motivation Problems Energy-efficient operation of battery-powered radios demands on energy management in link-based radio systems, interference-tolerant and spectrum-sharing environments. Motivation The primary focus is to investigate reliable, energy-efficient and interference-tolerant communications strategies to extend times of battery-powered 5G NR UE radios equipped with multiple antennas. The use of CSI and adaptive transmission based on linear precoding and beamforming is anticipated to improve the energy efficiency (EE) over frequency-selective fading channels. The transmit energy consumption of battery-powered UE radios can be minimized using an optimization technique in the presence of co-channel interference (CCI). Jun Chen Energy-Efficient Transmission in 5G 4 / 16

  5. Metrics for Transmit Energy Efficiency Packet-based Transmit Energy Efficiency (EE) η ee The average transmit EE η ee is defined by a ratio of the number of successfully received bits to the total energy consumption after erasures (successful bit per Joule). N pk N pk good good η ee = = T tx ( P pa + P tx + P bb ) (bit/J) . E T Spectral Efficiency (SE) η se The SE η se quantifies the successful data rate that can be reliably achieved at the receiver over the occupied bandwidth. N pk good η se = (bit/s/Hz) T tx · B w where E T is the transmit energy, N pk good is the total number of successfully decoded data bits in packets. T tx is the total transmit time for a given number of bits. P tx and P bb represent the average power consumption of the TX and baseband (BB) subsystems respectively. B w is the 3-dB noise bandwidth. Jun Chen Energy-Efficient Transmission in 5G 5 / 16

  6. Agenda Introduction to 5G New Radio Problems and Motivation Metrics of Transmit Energy Efficiency Energy-Efficient 5G NR Systems with Adaptive Transmission Conclusions Jun Chen Energy-Efficient Transmission in 5G 6 / 16

  7. Hybrid Beamforming Architecture of 5G NR System Figure: Block diagram of hybrid beamforming implementation of 5G NR systems in the time division duplex (TDD) mode. Jun Chen Energy-Efficient Transmission in 5G 7 / 16

  8. Adaptive TX-RX Schemes In the Presence of Interference Uplink Data Transmission and Receiving The adaptively transmitted and received can be modeled for the i th OFDM data symbol on the k th subcarrier ( k =0, 1, · · · , N d − 1) as � � � ˆ ˆ ˆ S i G i G i G i H i W i W i F i S i G i G i G i V i N i S d , k = G G G H W W F S d , k + G G G G V k + N N S P T G k G d , k G H k W a , k W d , k F S k G d , k G V a , k a , k k k � �� � � �� � � �� � RX Processing TX Processing RX Processing S i H i where N d is the number of data subcarriers, S d , k is the transmitted data vector, H k is the channel transfer S H G i F i matrix in the frequency domain. G G k and F F k are the precoding decoder and encoder matrices used at the Rx W i W i and the Tx respectively. W W d , k and W W a , k are digital and analog beamforming steering matrices respectively. G i G i V i N i G G d , k are G G a , k are digital and analog beamformer matrices at the RX. V V k and N N k are the overall interference signal vector and AWGN noise vector respectively on the k th subcarrier sampled at the Rx. Optimal Precoding and Beamforming Matrices G i F i G i G i W i W i The optimal G k , F k , G d , k , G a , k , W d , k and W a , k are obtained based on equal MSE errors G F G G W W across linear precoded beams and beamforming branches. Jun Chen Energy-Efficient Transmission in 5G 8 / 16

  9. Co-channel Interference Model CCI Model For the i th OFDM symbol period, the interference signal vector from co-channel interferers on subcarrier k in the frequency domain can be represented as M i 0 i c λ k � � 1 1 4 π r − γ p / 2 P 1 / 2 X i 0 V i H i V V k = G m c L T , m c H H m c , k X X 2 2 m c m c , k NF i 0 =1 m c =1 where the number of active interferers M i 0 c . M i 0 c is the number of active co-channel interferers. G m c represents transmit antenna power gains of the m c th co-channel interferer. L NF is the loss factor due to the Rx noise figure. λ k denotes the wavelength of center frequency of subcarrier k . r m c is the average distance from the m c th co-channel interferer to the gNB. γ p is the propagation path loss exponent. P T , m c represents H i the total transmit power of the m c th co-channel interferer. H H m c , k denotes the channel frequency responses X i 0 and modeled as i.i.d. RVs. The X m c , k are the random BB signals transmitted from the active m c th X co-channel interferer. Jun Chen Energy-Efficient Transmission in 5G 9 / 16

  10. Transmit Energy Efficiency Assumptions Reciprocal channels or approximately reciprocal channels in the time division duplex (TDD) mode, the UE Tx therefore has channel state knowledge The CSI reference signal (CSI-RS) upon DL is exploited to estimate the channel state between the gNB and UEs The CSI changes slowly during a frame period (10 ms) Transmit Energy Efficiency η ee The average transmit EE, η ee , on the UL can be approximated as a nonlinear function of estimated channel transfer matrix ˆ H H and average SINR per bit γ b H N pk ≈ η ee (ˆ good η ee = H , γ b ) H H E t Jun Chen Energy-Efficient Transmission in 5G 10 / 16

  11. Optimization Algorithm The energy-constrained problem for transmit EE upon the UL can be modeled as minimize f η ( γ r ) = − η ee (ˆ H , γ r ), subject to 1 ≤ γ r ≤ γ max H H r The UE computes the maximize transmit EE and obtains the optimal SINR γ opt . r Figure: Illustration of EE optimization process between UE and gNB Jun Chen Energy-Efficient Transmission in 5G 11 / 16

  12. Numerical Results: Transmit EE η ee and SE η se (a) Transmit EE η ee (b) SE η se γ opt 14 =3.5 dB 1.4 r 2x2MIMO, 1-beam 4x4MIMO, 1-beam 12 1.2 4x4MIMO, 2-beam γ opt =9.4 dB 4x4MIMO, 3-beam r 10 1 γ opt =13.2 dB γ opt =9.4 dB r r γ opt =13.2 dB η se (bits/s/Hz) r η ee (Mbit/J) 8 0.8 γ opt =4.9 dB r γ opt 6 0.6 =4.9 dB γ opt r =3.5 dB r 4 0.4 2x2MIMO, 1-beam 4x4MIMO, 1-beam 2 0.2 4x4MIMO, 2-beam 4x4MIMO, 3-beam 0 0 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 γ r (dB) γ r (dB) Figure: Transmit EE η ee and SE η se of 2 × 2 and 4 × 4 MIMO systems with 1/2/3-spatial beam ( N B =1, 2 and 3) vs. SINR γ r over a low correlated Rayleigh channel model. Jun Chen Energy-Efficient Transmission in 5G 12 / 16

  13. Numerical Results: Maximum EE η max ee , SE η se and Optimal SINR γ opt r =3.5dB 15 =3.5dB ← γ opt =9.4dB =9.4dB ← γ opt r 14 r =4.9dB =4.9dB ← γ opt 12 ← γ opt =13.2dB r =13.2dB r ← γ opt 10 ee (Mbits/J) η se (bits/s/Hz) ee (Mbits/J) η se (bits/s/Hz) ← γ opt r r 10 ← γ opt ← γ opt r r 8 η max η max ee =7.85e+05 bits/J ee =2.88e+04 bits/J 6 5 4 1.5 1.4 ← η max 1.2 2 1 1 ← η max 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.2 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Architecture Index Architecture Index (a) p cc =0.15 (b) p cc =0.30 Figure: Maximum transmit EE η max ee , corresponding SE η se and optimal SINR γ opt for Non-AT and AT r schemes varying with the probabilities of CCI p cc =0.15 and 0.3 over the Rayleigh channel model. Architecture indices 1 ∼ 8 on the x-axis denote ”2x2 MIMO-1b,Non-AT”, ”4x4 MIMO-1b,Non-AT”, ”4x4 MIMO-2b,Non-AT”, ”4x4 MIMO-3b,Non-AT”, ”2x2 MIMO-1b,AT”,”4x4 MIMO-1b,AT”, ”4x4 MIMO-2b,AT”, and ”4x4 MIMO-3b,AT” respectively. Jun Chen Energy-Efficient Transmission in 5G 13 / 16

  14. Numerical Results: Maximum EE η max ee , SE η se and Optimal SINR γ opt r (Continued) =3.5dB =3.5dB =9.4dB ← γ opt r 10 =9.4dB ← γ opt =4.9dB r =4.9dB ← γ opt 7 =13.2dB r ← γ opt =13.2dB ← γ opt r ee (Mbits/J) η se (bits/s/Hz) ee (Mbits/J) η se (bits/s/Hz) r 6 ← γ opt r ← γ opt r 5 ← γ opt r η max η max 5 4 ee =6.44e+02 bits/J ee =9.07e+00 bits/J 3 2 2 1.4 1.2 1 ← η max 1 ← η max 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Architecture Index Architecture Index (a) p cc =0.50 (b) p cc =0.80 Figure: Maximum transmit EE η max ee , corresponding SE η se and optimal SINR γ opt of 2 × 2 MIMO 1-spatial r beam and 4 × 4 MIMO with 1-/2-/3-spatial beam architectures for Non-AT and AT schemes varying with the probabilities of CCI p cc =0.5 and 0.8 over the Rayleigh channel model. Jun Chen Energy-Efficient Transmission in 5G 14 / 16

Recommend


More recommend