elliptic measure and rectifiability
play

Elliptic measure and rectifiability Tatiana Toro University of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Elliptic measure and rectifiability Tatiana Toro University of Washington Workshop on Real Harmonic Analysis and its Applications to Partial Differential Equations and Geometric Measure Theory: on the occasion of the 60th birthday of Steve


  1. Elliptic measure and rectifiability Tatiana Toro University of Washington Workshop on Real Harmonic Analysis and its Applications to Partial Differential Equations and Geometric Measure Theory: on the occasion of the 60th birthday of Steve Hofmann Madrid, Espa˜ na Junio 1, 2018 Tatiana Toro (University of Washington) Elliptic measure and rectifiability June 1, 2018 1 / 24

  2. Motivation What is the relationship between the geometry of a domain and the boundary regularity of the solutions to a differential operator on this domain? ( regularity=degree of smoothness .) Tatiana Toro (University of Washington) Elliptic measure and rectifiability June 1, 2018 2 / 24

  3. Motivation What is the relationship between the geometry of a domain and the boundary regularity of the solutions to a differential operator on this domain? ( regularity=degree of smoothness .) Can the regularity at the boundary of a “general harmonic function” distinguish between a rectifiable and a purely unrectifiable boundary? Tatiana Toro (University of Washington) Elliptic measure and rectifiability June 1, 2018 2 / 24

  4. Some history F&M Riesz (1916): Let Ω ⊂ R 2 be a simply connected domain bounded by a Jordan curve. If H 1 ( ∂ Ω) < ∞ then the harmonic measure ω and the surface measure σ = H ∂ Ω are mutually absolutely continuous, i.e. ω ( E ) = 0 iff σ ( E ) = 0 Tatiana Toro (University of Washington) Elliptic measure and rectifiability June 1, 2018 3 / 24

  5. Some history F&M Riesz (1916): Let Ω ⊂ R 2 be a simply connected domain bounded by a Jordan curve. If H 1 ( ∂ Ω) < ∞ then the harmonic measure ω and the surface measure σ = H ∂ Ω are mutually absolutely continuous, i.e. ω ( E ) = 0 iff σ ( E ) = 0 Lavrentiev (1936): Let Ω ⊂ R 2 be a bounded simply connected chord arc domain. Then ω ∈ A ∞ ( σ ). What happens in higher dimensions? Tatiana Toro (University of Washington) Elliptic measure and rectifiability June 1, 2018 3 / 24

  6. Domains A domain Ω ⊂ R n is uniform (1-sided NTA) (with constant M ) [Aikawa - Hofmann & Martell] if it satisfies: Tatiana Toro (University of Washington) Elliptic measure and rectifiability June 1, 2018 4 / 24

  7. Domains A domain Ω ⊂ R n is uniform (1-sided NTA) (with constant M ) [Aikawa - Hofmann & Martell] if it satisfies: ◮ Interior corkscrew condition (with constant M ) Tatiana Toro (University of Washington) Elliptic measure and rectifiability June 1, 2018 4 / 24

  8. Domains A domain Ω ⊂ R n is uniform (1-sided NTA) (with constant M ) [Aikawa - Hofmann & Martell] if it satisfies: ◮ Interior corkscrew condition (with constant M ) ◮ Harnack chain condition (with constant M ) Tatiana Toro (University of Washington) Elliptic measure and rectifiability June 1, 2018 4 / 24

  9. Domains A domain Ω ⊂ R n is uniform (1-sided NTA) (with constant M ) [Aikawa - Hofmann & Martell] if it satisfies: ◮ Interior corkscrew condition (with constant M ) ◮ Harnack chain condition (with constant M ) A domain Ω ⊂ R n is NTA (non-tangentially accessible) [Jerison - Kenig] if: ◮ Ω is uniform ◮ Exterior corkscrew condition Tatiana Toro (University of Washington) Elliptic measure and rectifiability June 1, 2018 4 / 24

  10. Domains A domain Ω ⊂ R n is uniform (1-sided NTA) (with constant M ) [Aikawa - Hofmann & Martell] if it satisfies: ◮ Interior corkscrew condition (with constant M ) ◮ Harnack chain condition (with constant M ) A domain Ω ⊂ R n is NTA (non-tangentially accessible) [Jerison - Kenig] if: ◮ Ω is uniform ◮ Exterior corkscrew condition A domain Ω ⊂ R n has Ahlfors regular boundary if there exists c 0 > 1 such that for q ∈ ∂ Ω and r ∈ (0 , diam Ω) 0 r n − 1 ≤ σ ( B ( q , r )) ≤ c 0 r n − 1 . c − 1 Tatiana Toro (University of Washington) Elliptic measure and rectifiability June 1, 2018 4 / 24

  11. Harmonic measure and quantitative rectifiability Let Ω ⊂ R n be a uniform domain with Ahlfors regular boundary. Then the following are equivalent: 1) ∂ Ω is ( n − 1)-uniformly rectifiable. Tatiana Toro (University of Washington) Elliptic measure and rectifiability June 1, 2018 5 / 24

  12. Harmonic measure and quantitative rectifiability Let Ω ⊂ R n be a uniform domain with Ahlfors regular boundary. Then the following are equivalent: 1) ∂ Ω is ( n − 1)-uniformly rectifiable. 2) Ω is an NTA domain, thus a chord arc domain. Tatiana Toro (University of Washington) Elliptic measure and rectifiability June 1, 2018 5 / 24

  13. Harmonic measure and quantitative rectifiability Let Ω ⊂ R n be a uniform domain with Ahlfors regular boundary. Then the following are equivalent: 1) ∂ Ω is ( n − 1)-uniformly rectifiable. 2) Ω is an NTA domain, thus a chord arc domain. 3) ω ∈ A ∞ ( σ ). Proof: 2) = ⇒ 3) David–Jerison & Semmes Tatiana Toro (University of Washington) Elliptic measure and rectifiability June 1, 2018 5 / 24

  14. Harmonic measure and quantitative rectifiability Let Ω ⊂ R n be a uniform domain with Ahlfors regular boundary. Then the following are equivalent: 1) ∂ Ω is ( n − 1)-uniformly rectifiable. 2) Ω is an NTA domain, thus a chord arc domain. 3) ω ∈ A ∞ ( σ ). Proof: 2) = ⇒ 3) David–Jerison & Semmes ⇒ 1) Hofmann–Martell–Uriarte-Tuero 3) = Tatiana Toro (University of Washington) Elliptic measure and rectifiability June 1, 2018 5 / 24

  15. Harmonic measure and quantitative rectifiability Let Ω ⊂ R n be a uniform domain with Ahlfors regular boundary. Then the following are equivalent: 1) ∂ Ω is ( n − 1)-uniformly rectifiable. 2) Ω is an NTA domain, thus a chord arc domain. 3) ω ∈ A ∞ ( σ ). Proof: 2) = ⇒ 3) David–Jerison & Semmes ⇒ 1) Hofmann–Martell–Uriarte-Tuero 3) = 1) = ⇒ 2) Azzam–Hofmann–Martell–Nystr¨ om–Toro Tatiana Toro (University of Washington) Elliptic measure and rectifiability June 1, 2018 5 / 24

  16. Divergence form elliptic operators Let Ω ⊂ R n be a bounded Wiener regular domain and Lu = − div ( A ( x ) ∇ u ) with A ( x ) = ( a ij ( x )) an uniformly elliptic symmetric matrix with bounded measurable coefficients, i.e. λ | ξ | 2 ≤ � A ( x ) ξ, ξ � , � A ( x ) ξ, ζ � Λ ≤ | ξ || ζ | for x ∈ Ω and ξ, ζ ∈ R n . Tatiana Toro (University of Washington) Elliptic measure and rectifiability June 1, 2018 6 / 24

  17. Divergence form elliptic operators Let Ω ⊂ R n be a bounded Wiener regular domain and Lu = − div ( A ( x ) ∇ u ) with A ( x ) = ( a ij ( x )) an uniformly elliptic symmetric matrix with bounded measurable coefficients, i.e. λ | ξ | 2 ≤ � A ( x ) ξ, ξ � , � A ( x ) ξ, ζ � Λ ≤ | ξ || ζ | for x ∈ Ω and ξ, ζ ∈ R n . Let ω L be the corresponding elliptic measure. Recall that if f ∈ C ( ∂ Ω) there exists u ∈ C (Ω) such that � Lu = 0 in Ω (1) u = f on ∂ Ω Tatiana Toro (University of Washington) Elliptic measure and rectifiability June 1, 2018 6 / 24

  18. Divergence form elliptic operators Let Ω ⊂ R n be a bounded Wiener regular domain and Lu = − div ( A ( x ) ∇ u ) with A ( x ) = ( a ij ( x )) an uniformly elliptic symmetric matrix with bounded measurable coefficients, i.e. λ | ξ | 2 ≤ � A ( x ) ξ, ξ � , � A ( x ) ξ, ζ � Λ ≤ | ξ || ζ | for x ∈ Ω and ξ, ζ ∈ R n . Let ω L be the corresponding elliptic measure. Recall that if f ∈ C ( ∂ Ω) there exists u ∈ C (Ω) such that � Lu = 0 in Ω (1) u = f on ∂ Ω Moreover ˆ f ( q ) d ω x u ( x ) = L ( q ) ∂ Ω Tatiana Toro (University of Washington) Elliptic measure and rectifiability June 1, 2018 6 / 24

  19. Questions For what type of domains Ω and operators L do we have ω L ∈ A ∞ ( σ )? Tatiana Toro (University of Washington) Elliptic measure and rectifiability June 1, 2018 7 / 24

  20. Questions For what type of domains Ω and operators L do we have ω L ∈ A ∞ ( σ )? What does the fact that ω L ∈ A ∞ ( σ ) imply about the geometry of Ω? Tatiana Toro (University of Washington) Elliptic measure and rectifiability June 1, 2018 7 / 24

  21. Questions For what type of domains Ω and operators L do we have ω L ∈ A ∞ ( σ )? What does the fact that ω L ∈ A ∞ ( σ ) imply about the geometry of Ω? Caffarelli-Fabes-Kenig, Modica-Mortola, Modica-Mortola-Salsa (1981-2): There exist Lipschitz domains and operators L for which ω L and σ are mutually singular. Tatiana Toro (University of Washington) Elliptic measure and rectifiability June 1, 2018 7 / 24

  22. Questions For what type of domains Ω and operators L do we have ω L ∈ A ∞ ( σ )? What does the fact that ω L ∈ A ∞ ( σ ) imply about the geometry of Ω? Caffarelli-Fabes-Kenig, Modica-Mortola, Modica-Mortola-Salsa (1981-2): There exist Lipschitz domains and operators L for which ω L and σ are mutually singular. Questions: Characterize the operators L for which ω L ∈ A ∞ ( σ ) . To what extent does this characterization depend on the domain? Tatiana Toro (University of Washington) Elliptic measure and rectifiability June 1, 2018 7 / 24

  23. Different approaches Perturbation theory. Tatiana Toro (University of Washington) Elliptic measure and rectifiability June 1, 2018 8 / 24

  24. Different approaches Perturbation theory. Structure of the matrix A . Tatiana Toro (University of Washington) Elliptic measure and rectifiability June 1, 2018 8 / 24

Recommend


More recommend