ee
play

EE Dresden University of Technology Chair of Energy Economics and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Feb 27, 2024 •373 likes •616 views

A Combined Merchant-Regulatory Mechanism for Electricity Transmission in Europe Juan Roselln and Hannes Weigt EE Dresden University of Technology Chair of Energy Economics and Public Sector Management and Centro de Investigacin y

  1. A Combined Merchant-Regulatory Mechanism for Electricity Transmission in Europe Juan Rosellón and Hannes Weigt EE² Dresden University of Technology Chair of Energy Economics and Public Sector Management and Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE) INFRADAY 5 th & 6 th October 2007 - 1 -

  2. Agenda 1. Introduction 2. State of the literature 3. Model approaches: 1. Cost function analysis 2. Two part tariff model 3. Application 4. Conclusion 5. Literature - 2 -

  3. Two Part Tariff Vogelsang (2001) proposes the following approach: 1. The Transco should be allowed to price in a way that capacity is best utilized 2. The Transco should rise enough money to invest + t w t w p q F N ≤ + − i X 1 − − + t w t w p q F N 1 1 transmission price transmission output p q F fixed fee N number of consumers interest rate regulatory X-factor i X � Aim: Test the Vogelsang approach on meshed electricity networks - 3 -

  4. Agenda 1. Introduction 2. State of the literature 3. Model approaches: 1. Cost function analysis 2. Two part tariff model 3. Application 4. Conclusion 5. Literature - 4 -

  5. Approaches to transmission investment Long term FTRs: Regulatory approach: • Auction of FTRs by an ISO • transmission firm is regulated through benchmark regulation or price • Participation voluntary � merchant regulation mechanism e.g. Léautier (2000), Joskow and Tirole e.g. Kristiansen and Rosellon (2006), (2002) Bushnell and Stoft (1997) Hogan-Rosellón-Vogelsang (2007) combine the merchant and regulatory approaches in an environment of price-taking generators and loads Extension of the Vogelsang (2001) approach for meshed projects Designed for Transcos but also applicable for ISOs Preliminary results of the HRV profit-maximizing regulatory model show convergence to marginal-cost pricing - 5 -

  6. Agenda 1. Introduction 2. State of the literature 3. Model approaches: 1. Cost function analysis 2. Two part tariff model 3. Application 4. Conclusion 5. Literature - 6 -

  7. General Outline 3 basic research questions: 1. Impact of loop flows on global extension cost functions 2. Implementation of the HRV regulatory model to meshed electricity networks 3. Application to an exiting network Models are based on: • numerical simulations using GAMS • power flows are calculated with a DC Load Flow model based on voltage angle difference • several scenarios have been simulated including asymmetric line costs, varying starting values - 7 -

  8. Agenda 1. Introduction 2. State of the literature 3. Model approaches: 1. Cost function analysis 2. Two part tariff model 3. Application 4. Conclusion 5. Literature - 8 -

  9. Model formulation Minimization of the global extension costs: i ∑ = C FTR f k ( ) min ( ) ij ji k i j , s.t. -H*q ≤ k Line capacity constraint q = FTR*e Linkage between FTRs and net injections With PTDF-Matrix line extension cost function H f(k) q net injections FTR FTR between two nodes k line capacities e vector of ones - 9 -

  10. Data 2 basic grid settings are tested: n1 n2 n3 line1 line2 n1 line3 line4 line5 line6 line2 n3 line7 n4 line1 n5 line3 line8 line9 n6 n2 3 line extension functions are tested: = + f a k c Linear extension costs ij ij ij = + f a k c 2 Quadratic extension costs ij ij ij ( ) c = ln + + f a b k Logarithmic extension costs ij ij ij ij - 10 -

  11. Results with fixed PTDF Global cost function correlates to the number of loop flow lines: - 11 -

  12. Results with variable PTDF Global cost function does not correlate to the number of loop flow lines: - 12 -

  13. Results with variable PTDF and six nodes logarithmic extension Shifting between different extension schemes leads to sharp slope changes - 13 -

  14. Agenda 1. Introduction 2. State of the literature 3. Model approaches: 1. Cost function analysis 2. Two part tariff model 3. Application 4. Conclusion 5. Literature - 14 -

  15. Model formulation as MPEC Profit maximizing Transco: ( ) ∑ π = ∆ + − t t t t t p q F N c k max ij ij ij k F , t s.t. − − ∆ + ≤ ∆ + t t t t t t t t p q F N p q F N 1 1 Regulatory constraint ij ij ij ij Lower level problem: * d n t ( ) , ∑ ∫ ∑ = − Welfare maximization: W p d d c g g max ( ) d ( ) n t n t n t n t , , , , n t n t , , 0 s.t. P ≤ t P max Line capacity restriction ij ij − − = t t t g d q 0 Energy balance i i i g ≤ t g max Plant capacity restriction i n - 15 -

  16. Results For fixed PTDF: • results do not indicate a proper movement, rather a single extension resulting in one price change • sensitivities (starting values, asymmetric cost functions) do not result in a continuous price movement � Not accounting of discounting may bias the outcome • the starting value for fixed part has no influence For variable PTDF: • continuous price movement towards marginal generation costs � continuous grid extension • starting value for fixed part still irrelevant - 16 -

  17. Results with variable PTDF Price decrease towards marginal costs of generation - 17 -

  18. Agenda 1. Introduction 2. State of the literature 3. Model approaches: 1. Cost function analysis 2. Two part tariff model 3. Application 4. Conclusion 5. Literature - 18 -

  19. Test Model Simplified model of the BENELUX: - Covering 7 nodes and 8 auxiliary nodes - Including 8 plant types (nuclear, lignite, coal, CCGT, gas/oil, hydro, pump) with fixed marginal costs - Neglecting wind capacities - Ten periods with fixed values for the first period - Only network upgrades possible at linear extension costs of 100 € per km per MW capacity - 19 -

  20. Results Extension schedule leads to prices convergence at a level of coal units Overall welfare increases, significant profit increase for the Transco < =15 15-20 20-25 25-30 30-40 >=40 Prices [€/MWh] Extension between t5 and t1 Extension between t10 and t5 t1 t5 t10 - 20 -

  21. Agenda 1. Introduction 2. State of the literature 3. Model approaches: 1. Cost function analysis 2. Two part tariff model 3. Application 4. Conclusion 5. Literature - 21 -

  22. Conclusion • A combination of the merchant-FTR approach with the regulatory approach to electricity transmission expansion • 3 distinguish topics (cost functions, HRV approach implementation, application) • Develop first results towards a more detailed analysis � Results indicate that the two part approach may be a proper tool for fostering efficient grid extensions in meshed electricity networks Lookout: • Further research necessary to verify results and extend the approaches • Additional non modeling related topics are relevant too (property rights, implementation) - 22 -

  23. Agenda 1. Introduction 2. State of the literature 3. Model approaches: 1. Cost function analysis 2. Two part tariff model 3. Application 4. Conclusion 5. Literature - 23 -

Recommend

More recommend