E NGI NE E RI NG SUST AI NI NG F UNDS WORK GROUP ANDREW - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Pho to Co urte sy o f XXU Ore g o n T e c h E NGI NE E RI NG SUST AI NI NG F UNDS WORK GROUP ANDREW RO G ERS DIREC T O R, UNIVERSIT Y BUDG ET & FINANC E

I NT RODUCT I ON T his Pre se nta tio n will b rie fly c o ve r the fo llo wing  Outc o me s o f the 2015 wo rkg ro up fo r E T SF .  Pro pe rtie s fo r a pro po se d E T SF a llo c a tio n mo de l.  Pa st Co mmissio n I nput o n the upc o ming wo rkg ro up  F unda me nta l Que stio ns fo r the wo rkg ro up

T HE 2015 WORK GROUP  I n spring 2015, the HE CC c o nve ne d a wo rkg ro up whic h de te rmine d a n a llo c a tio n fo rmula fo r E T SF fo r the 2015-17 b ie nnium.  T he a llo c a tio n mo de l distrib ute d funds a s fo llo ws: ▪ F o r the 2015-16 fisc a l ye a r, 80% o f funds we re b a se d o n histo ric a l a llo c a tio ns with 20% b a se d o n the “Ore g o n Stude nts, Ore g o n Jo b s” mo de l. ▪ F o r the 2016-17 fisc a l ye a r, histo ric a l funds we re fro ze n a nd a ny a dditio na l funds o ve r the prio r ye a r we re distrib ute d o n the b a sis o f the “Ore g o n Stude nts, Ore g o n Jo b s” mo de l b a se d o n the pro po rtio n tha t e a c h institutio n wa s unde rfunde d ha d this mo de l b e e n the so le de te rmina nt o f funding in the 2015-16 fisc a l ye a r.

PROPE RT I E S F OR A PROPOSE D E T SF AL L OCAT I ON MODE L  Ba se d o n prio r wo rk o n E T I C a nd E T SF a llo c a tio n mo de ls, sta ff a ntic ipa te s tha t the funding mo de l fro m this ne w wo rkg ro up will inc o rpo ra te the fo llo wing pro pe rtie s: ▪ Ra tio na lize funding a llo c a tio ns ▪ Alig n inve stme nt o f Susta ining F unds in o rde r to re wa rd tig ht c o upling o f unive rsity pro g ra ms a nd g ra dua te s with la b o r fo rc e ne e ds ▪ Re c o g nize a nd re spe c t pa st pro c e sse s, disc ussio ns, a nd e ffo rts

PRI OR COMMI SSI ON I NPUT  I n No ve mb e r 2015, the c o mmissio n g a ve the fo llo wing input o n the a llo c a tio n o f E T SF a ppro pria tio ns: ▪ Histo ric a l funding sho uld b e pha se d o ut o ve r time a nd the fo c us o f funding sho uld b e o n o utc o me s. ▪ We sho uld b e a s b ro a d a s po ssib le in ho w we de fine suc c e ss. ▪ I f po ssib le , wa g e da ta sho uld b e inc lude d in the c a lc ula tio ns. ▪ T he fo rmula ne e ds to c o nside r ho w to ke e p institutio ns a c c o unta b le while a djusting to c ha ng e s in the e c o no my/ a nd wo rkfo rc e ne e ds. ▪ A simila r tra nsitio n pe rio d to the SSCM is pre fe ra b le .

F UNDAME NT AL QUE ST I ONS F OR T HE WORK GROUP  Sta ff a ntic ipa te s the fo llo wing q ue stio ns, a mo ng o the rs, will b e funda me nta l to the g ro up’ s wo rk: ▪ Sho uld a ll fie lds/ a re a s o f study b e we ig hte d e q ua lly o r va rie d b a se d o n wo rkfo rc e ne e ds? ▪ Sho uld g ra dua te a nd unde rg ra dua te de g re e re c ipie nts b e we ig hte d e q ua lly? ▪ Sho uld no n-re side nt g ra dua te s b e inc lude d if the y sta y a nd find jo b s in Ore g o n?