donald j sefcik do mba
play

Donald J. Sefcik, DO, MBA Senior Associate Dean College of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Donald J. Sefcik, DO, MBA Senior Associate Dean College of Osteopathic Medicine Michigan State University In-Service Examination (ISE) scores What do they represent? How should you interpret them? What should you do with them?


  1. Donald J. Sefcik, DO, MBA Senior Associate Dean College of Osteopathic Medicine Michigan State University

  2. • In-Service Examination (ISE) scores � What do they represent? � How should you interpret them? � What should you do with them? • Techniques used to raise ISE scores • Recommendations

  3. Emergency Medicine • Hern et al (2009); Cheng (2008); Gillen (1997) Family Medicine • Sevensma SC, Navarre G, Richards RK (2008) Internal Medicine • McDonald, Zeger & Kolars (2008) • Garilbaldi et al (2002) OB/Gyne • Withiam-Leitch & Olawaiye (2008) Pediatrics • Aeder, Fogel & Schaeffer (2010) • Langenau, Fogel & Schaeffer (2009) Radiology Surgery • Shellito et al (2010); Subhas et al (2009); Kosir et al (2008) • Ferguson & Warshaw (2006); Virgilio et al (2003); Bull et al (2001)

  4. A 72 year-old patient presents with progressive difficulty breathing, jugular venous distention, orthopnea, bilateral lower extremity edema , and bilateral rales. Which of the following is most important when deciding upon treatment options? A. minute respiration B. heart rate C. degree of lower extremity edema D. respiratory rate E. none of the above

  5. A 72 year-old patient presents with progressive difficulty breathing, jugular venous distention, orthopnea, bilateral lower extremity edema , and bilateral rales. Which of the following is most important when deciding upon treatment options? We don’t treat patients without understanding the etiology of their predicament and the nature of the intervention. Guiding residents’ learning should follow similar guidelines.

  6. X R = X T + M E

  7. X R = X T + M E X R = Reported ISE score X T = True Score M E = Measurement Errors

  8. X R = X T + M E X R = Reported ISE Score Scores Percent = items correct = raw score Percentile = resident rank compared to peers

  9. The report of the performance of a PGY2 on his ISE reveals a percent correct of 63 and a percentile rank of 67. What should you do? A. mandate the resident enter a remediation program B. reduce work hours by 25% to increase study time C. do not promote the resident to the PGY3 year D. encourage the resident to keep studying E. resign as program director

  10. • What is an “average” percent score ? http://www.eric.vcu.edu/home/curriculum/print/2009Histograms.pdf

  11. • What is an “average” percent score ? 2009 IM (n = 402 programs) PGY1 = 54% PGY2 = 59% PGY3 = 63% http://www.eric.vcu.edu/home/curriculum/print/2009Histograms.pdf

  12. • What is an “average” percent score ? 2009 IM (n = 402 programs) PGY1 = 54% PGY2 = 59%(example was PGY2 = 63%) PGY3 = 63% http://www.eric.vcu.edu/home/curriculum/print/2009Histograms.pdf

  13. Your PGY2 from the previous example is now a PGY3. His percentile rank while in your program has been PGY1 = 62, PGY2 = 67, PGY3 = 64. What should you do? realize that this is a common pattern of progression A. worry that this resident will fail his certifying exam B. do not promote the resident to the PGY4 year C. terminate this resident from your program D. delegate the situation to your associate PD E.

  14. Why is percentile important? Increased risk of failing the certifying exam %F 30th 50th 100th

  15. Why is percentile important? Increased risk of failing the certifying exam The lower the percentile rank – The greater the risk of failing the certifying examination %F 30th 50th 100th

  16. Percent Correct Percentile Increases each year PGY1 PGY2 PGY3 PGY4

  17. Percent Correct Percentile Potential Problem PGY1 PGY2 PGY3 PGY4

  18. Percent Correct Percentile Tends to be stable PGY1 PGY2 PGY3 PGY4

  19. Percent Correct Percentile Potential Problem PGY1 PGY2 PGY3 PGY4

  20. Tracking percentiles • Three different residents • Three years of scores C 1 B 1 A 1 %F 30th 50th 100th

  21. Tracking percentiles • Three different residents • Three years of scores C 1 B 1 A 1 C 2 B 2 A 2 %F 30th 50th 100th

  22. Tracking percentiles • Three different residents • Three years of scores C 1 B 1 A 1 C 2 B 2 A 2 B 3 C 3 A 3 %F 30th 50th 100th

  23. Tracking percentiles • Three different residents What can you do • Three years of scores to assess the residents between the annual ISE’s? C 1 B 1 A 1 C 2 B 2 A 2 B 3 C 3 A 3 %F 30th 50th 100th

  24. • Make decisions about • individual’s educational progression • program content areas that are outliers

  25. • Make decisions about • individual’s educational progression • program content areas that are outliers • Do not make decisions about: • promotion or termination

  26. X R = X T + M E X T = True Score = two components

  27. X R = X T + M E X T = True Score = two components X C = Score based on content X B = Score based on beyond content

  28. X R = X C + X B + M E X R = Reported ISE Score X C = Score based on content X B = Score based on beyond content M E = Measurement Error

  29. • Choosing your intervention options • Content • Beyond Content

  30. X C X B + Beyond Content Content PGY1 PGY3 PGY4 PGY2

  31. • Assigned / Programmed Reading • Conference Attendance • Didactic lectures • Grand Rounds / M&M • Practice Questions • Board Review Courses

  32. • Assigned / Programmed Reading • Conference Attendance • Didactic lectures / Journal Clubs • Grand Rounds / M&M • Practice Questions • Board Review Courses

  33. • Self-directed Studying • Preparing Lectures for Peers • Reading Fluency and Accuracy • Test Anxiety

  34. • Self-directed Studying • Preparing Lectures for Peers • Questions from / Clarification by an Attending • Reading Fluency and Accuracy • Developing theme in repeat failures • Test Anxiety • Definite impact on memory / recall

  35. • Intervention options • Content = more impact earlier in training PGY<2 - Programmed Reading / Didactics PGY>3 - Programmed Reading / Didactics

  36. • Beyond Content • Resident Heterogeneity (all years of training) Studying Skills Test-taking Skills

  37. • Beyond Content • Resident Heterogeneity Studying Skills • Memory techniques • Reading and Note-taking • Transfer Test-taking Skills • Reading- Fluency and Accuracy • Test Anxiety • Test-Wiseness

  38. 1 / 6

  39. 2 / 6

  40. 3 / 6

  41. 4 / 6 1. Assess the resident’s situation Develop an individualized plan It’s not just about X C 2. Create a team Resident and Attending Attending = Coach to Mentor 3. Establish a schedule Regular meetings 4. Monitor and Refine

  42. 5 / 6 1. Assess the resident’s situation Develop an individualized plan There are It’s not just about X C resources 2. Create a team to help you Resident and Attending help your Attending = Coach to Mentor resident 3. Establish a schedule Regular meetings 4. Monitor and Refine

  43. 6 / 6 We need to transition away from our focus on teaching (faculty-centered) and instead begin to focus on learning (resident-centered).

  44. Are there some Questions? Emergency Medicine • Hern et al (2009); Cheng (2008); Gillen (1997) Family Medicine • Sevensma SC, Navarre G, Richards RK (2008) Internal Medicine Complete Reference List • McDonald, Zeger & Kolars (2008) • Garilbaldi et al (2002) will be posted (pdf) OB/Gyne on SCS website • Withiam-Leitch & Olawaiye (2008) Pediatrics • Aeder, Fogel & Schaeffer (2010) • Langenau, Fogel & Schaeffer (2009) Radiology Surgery • Shellito et al (2010); Subhas et al (2009); Kosir et al (2008) • Ferguson & Warshaw (2006); Virgilio et al (2003); Bull et al (2001)

Recommend


More recommend