Domains(and(domain(walls( Andrs'Cano' - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Domains(and(domain(walls( Andrés'Cano' ICMCB.CNRS,'University'of'Bordeaux,'France' Department'of'Materials,'ETH'Zürich,'Switzerland'

References( On#the#theory#of#the#dispersion#of#magne2c#permeability#in#ferromagne2c#bodies## L.D.'Landau'and'E.'Lifshitz'' Phys.'Z.'Sowjet.'8,'153'(1935);'Collected'papers'of'L.D.'Landau,'pp.101.114 '' ' Physical#theory#of#ferromagne2c#domains## C.'KiYel'' Rev.'Mod.'Phys.'21,'541'(1949)' ' Magne2c#domains:#the#analysis#of#magne2c#microstrctures## A.'Hubert'and'R.'Schafer'(Springer,'Berlin,'1998)' # Microscopic#approach#to#current:driven#domain#wall#dynamics## G.'Tatara.'H.'Kohno,'J.'Shibata' Physics'Reports'468,'213'(2008)'

Outline( 1.(History(&(mo9va9on( ( 2.(Observa9on(techniques( ( 3.(The(origin(of(domains( ( 4.(Domain(walls( ( 5.(Domain(wall(mo9on(

domain'wall' domain'

The'concept'of' domain:( ( ' Postulated' by' Pierre' Weiss' in' 1907' to' explain' why' ferromagnebc'bodies'can'appear'non.magnebc.''' 110(aniversary!

F = a ( T − T c ) M 2 + bM 4 M + M 0 ferromagnebc paramagnebc T T c - M 0 Two'possible'states'below' T c#

M Barkhausen(effect( H

The'disbnct'response'of'ferromagnets'is'' inherently'related'to'domains'(and'domain'walls) ' M H

Observa9on(techniques( Magneto.opbcal'Kerr'effect'(MOKE) ' D = ε ( E + iQ M × E ) weak'(but'detectable)'dependence'on'the'magnebzabon'of'the'opbcal'constants '

Observa9on(techniques( Transmission'Electron'Microscopy'(TEM) ' F Lorentz = q ( v × B ) electrons'are'deflected'by'the'Lorentz'force' '

Observa9on(techniques( Transmission'Electron'Microscopy'(TEM) '

Observa9on(techniques( r · B =0 z }| { r · H = �r · M longitudinal'variabons'of' M 'are'a'source'of'magnebc'field'(stray'field)'' Magnebc'force'microscopy'(MFM)' F = µ 0 ( m tip · r ) H stray

Observa9on(techniques( Spin.polarized'scanning.tunneling'microscopy'(SP.STM)' 90ML'Dy/W(110)

Observa9on(techniques( Spin.polarized'scanning.tunneling'microscopy'(SP.STM)' 1ML'Fe/W(110)

Observa9on(techniques(

The(origin(of(domains( On#the#theory#of#the#dispersion#of#magne2c#permeability#in#ferromagne2c#bodies## Landau'&'Lifshitz,'Phys.'Z.'Sowjet.'8,'153'(1935)'

The(origin(of(domains( E magnetostatic = µ 0 Z H 2 r · H = �r · M d ( M ) dV � ! 2 domains'form'to'minimize'the'magnebc'energy'' r · M = 0 n · M | surface = 0 ˆ

d Size(of(domains(( d )( � ⇒ ∂ E ( d, L ) � E ( d, L ) = = 0 � L ∂ d � d 0 strategy :'compute'the'total'magnebc'energy'of'the'system'and' determine' d 'from'the'principle'of'minimum'energy' E 1 . 7 M 2 d E ( d, L ) = + ε dw ( L/d ) | {z } | {z } magnetostatic domain wall KiYel's'law d 0 ∼ L 1 / 2 d d 0

d Size(of(domains(( d )( L 1 . 7 M 2 d E stripe ( d, L ) = + ε dw ( L/d ) | {z } | {z } magnetostatic domain wall E flux clousure ( d, L ) = K 2 M 2 d + ε dw ( L/d ) | {z } | {z } domain wall anisotropy KiYel's'law d 0 ∼ L 1 / 2 To'know'the'actual'size'of'the'domains'we'need'' to'determine'the' energy(of(the(domain(walls(

Domain(walls( Micromagnebc'formalism' discrete continuous z }| { z }| { S i = S ( r i ) S ( r ) = M ( r ) /M s � ! 1 � 1 2( ∆ r i · r S | r = r i ) 2 S ( r i ) · S ( r i + ∆ r i ) � ! Z h ⇣ M ( r ) ⌘i 2 X H ex = � J ij S i · S j A dv ( A ⇠ J/a ) � ! r M s ij

Domain(walls( Uniaxial'ferromagnet'( m #=# M /M s )' Z n o � µ 0 A ( r m ) 2 + K ( m 2 x + m 2 E = y ) 2 M · H d ( M ) dv | {z } | {z } | {z } exchange anisotropy stray field � � m = 0 , sin θ ( x ) , cos θ ( x ) Bloch(wall ( r · M = 0) Z 1 ( A θ 0 2 + K sin 2 θ ) dx ε dw = �1 A θ 00 − K sin θ cos θ = 0 dx ) 2 + K cos 2 θ d A ( d θ ⇥ ⇤ = 0 dx dx ) 2 + cos 2 θ = 1 K ( d θ A θ − g ¨ l sin θ cos θ = 0 q p 1 − cos 2 θ = sin θ A d θ ± dx = K q q d θ K ln tan θ K sin θ = ± 2 = A ( x − X ) A dx →

Domain(walls( Uniaxial'ferromagnet'( m #=# M /M s )' Z n o � µ 0 A ( r m ) 2 + K ( m 2 x + m 2 E = y ) 2 M · H d ( M ) dv | {z } | {z } | {z } exchange anisotropy stray field � � m = 0 , sin θ ( x ) , cos θ ( x ) Bloch(wall ( r · M = 0) Z 1 ( A θ 0 2 + K sin 2 θ ) dx ε dw = �1 A θ 00 − K sin θ cos θ = 0 cos θ sin θ θ ( x ) = 2 arctan[exp( x/w )] � p w = A/K � / � - 4 - 2 2 4 √ ε dw = 4 AK

d Domains(&(domain(walls( L Fe,'Ni w ∼ 10 nm d 0 ( L = 1 cm) ∼ 10 µ m E d = d 0 ⇠ E d = d 0 magnetostatic ⌧ E d →∞ magnetostatic dw singleNdomain(state( if d 0 ∼ ( wL ) 1 / 2 L . w − →

Domain(walls(in(thin(films( Bloch(wall Neel(wall r · M 6 = 0 r · M = 0 top'view L ! L ! demagnebzing'factors � W L N Bloch = N N´ eel = W + L W + L 5 � / � 1 2 3 4

Domain(walls(in(thin(films( L ! ''''''''''''.'Mulb.dimensional'descripbon'due'to'the'stray'fields' ''''''''''''.'Addibonal'length'scales # ''''''''''''.'Analybcal'.>'numerical'calculabons'&'ansatzs'+'variabonal'procedures (

Domain(walls(in(thin(films( crossN9e(wall Neel(wall r · M 6 = 0

Bloch(walls Bloch(lines(&(Bloch(points two'(equivalent)'' rotabon'senses'

rotabon'senses' two'(equivalent)'' Bloch(lines(&(Bloch(points Bloch(walls

Domain(wall(mo9on( H eff M γ = µ 0 ge ˙ M = − γ M × H e ff (gyromagnetic ratio) 2 m e | {z } torque Z [ A ( r M ) 2 � KM 2 E = z � M · H tot ] dv H tot = H ext + H d Z [( A r 2 M + KM z ˆ δ E = e z + H tot ) · δ M ] dv | {z } H eff Landau.Lifshitz.Gilbert'equabon:' ˙ − α M × ˙ M = − γ M × H e ff M | {z } | {z } torque damping

Domain(wall(mo9on( m = − γ m × H e ff − α m × ˙ ˙ m y x z Z [ A ( r m ) 2 � Km 2 K d m 2 � M · H ext ] d 3 x E = z + y | {z } K d = µ 0 m y = 0 → stray-field-free wall 2 M 2 s m = − γ (sin θ cos φ , sin θ sin φ , cos θ ) sin θ r · (sin 2 θ r φ ) + K d θ � α ˙ ˙ φ sin θ = 2 γ A M s [ � 2 sin θ sin 2 φ ] � K + K d sin 2 φ φ sin θ + α ˙ ˙ θ = 2 γ � ⇥ r 2 θ � 1 2 sin 2 θ ( r φ ) 2 ⇤ sin 2 θ + γ H sin θ A M s 2

Domain(wall(mo9on( m = − γ m × H e ff − α m × ˙ ˙ m y x z Z [ A ( r m ) 2 � Km 2 K d m 2 � M · H ext ] d 3 x E = z + y | {z } K d = µ 0 m y = 0 → stray-field-free wall 2 M 2 s m = − γ (sin θ cos φ , sin θ sin φ , cos θ ) sin θ r · (sin 2 θ r φ ) + K d θ � α ˙ ˙ φ sin θ = 2 γ A M s [ � 2 sin θ sin 2 φ ] � K + K d sin 2 φ φ sin θ + α ˙ ˙ θ = 2 γ � ⇥ r 2 θ � 1 2 sin 2 θ ( r φ ) 2 ⇤ sin 2 θ + γ H sin θ A M s 2 θ = θ ( x, t ) and φ = conts.

Domain(wall(mo9on( m = − γ m × H e ff − α m × ˙ ˙ m y x z Z [ A ( r m ) 2 � Km 2 K d m 2 � M · H ext ] d 3 x E = z + y | {z } K d = µ 0 m y = 0 → stray-field-free wall 2 M 2 s m = − γ (sin θ cos φ , sin θ sin φ , cos θ ) sin θ r · (sin 2 θ r φ ) + K d θ � α ˙ ˙ φ sin θ = 2 γ A M s [ � 2 sin θ sin 2 φ ] � K + K d sin 2 φ φ sin θ + α ˙ ˙ θ = 2 γ � ⇥ r 2 θ � 1 2 sin 2 θ ( r φ ) 2 ⇤ sin 2 θ + γ H sin θ A M s 2 θ = θ ( x, t ) and φ = conts. � α K d x θ − K + K d sin 2 φ � � � = 2 γ A ∂ 2 γ M s sin 2 φ − H sin θ sin 2 θ M s 2 | {z } | {z } =0 =0 Walker's(solu9on(( θ ( x, t ) = 2 arctan { exp[ ± ( x ± vt ) /w ∗ ] } , sin 2 φ = H/H c q A/ ( K + K d sin 2 φ ) , w ∗ = H c = α 2 M s , v = γ α w ∗ H cos φ sin φ ⇣ ⌘ m = cosh[( x − vt ) /w ∗ ] , cosh[( x − vt ) /w ∗ ] , ± tanh[( x − vt ) /w ∗ ]

Domain(wall(mo9on( The'wall'moves'at'a'constant'speed'(~' H# for'low'fields).' ' If'the'speed'increases'the'angle'increases'.>'stray'field'&'wall'narrowing.' ' There'is'a'maximum'velocity.' ' There'is'a'cribcal'field'above'which'this'solubon'is'not'valid.' ( (( Walker's(solu9on(( θ ( x, t ) = 2 arctan { exp[ ± ( x ± vt ) /w ∗ ] } , sin 2 φ = H/H c q A/ ( K + K d sin 2 φ ) , w ∗ = H c = α 2 M s , v = γ α w ∗ H cos φ sin φ ⇣ ⌘ m = cosh[( x − vt ) /w ∗ ] , cosh[( x − vt ) /w ∗ ] , ± tanh[( x − vt ) /w ∗ ]

Domain(wall(mo9on( Longitudinal(suscep9bility(( Z t γ γ α w ∗ α w ∗ i ω H ω e i ω t L z α w ∗ H ω e i ω t → ∆ x = i ω H ω e i ω t → ∆ M ω = v = γ vdt = d × Surface 0 χ l ( ω ) ≡ 1 H ω e i ω t = γ w ∗ ∆ M ω (relaxation behavior with no resonance) V i ω α d Walker's(solu9on(( θ ( x, t ) = 2 arctan { exp[ ± ( x ± vt ) /w ∗ ] } , sin 2 φ = H/H c q A/ ( K + K d sin 2 φ ) , w ∗ = H c = α 2 M s , v = γ α w ∗ H cos φ sin φ ⇣ ⌘ m = cosh[( x − vt ) /w ∗ ] , cosh[( x − vt ) /w ∗ ] , ± tanh[( x − vt ) /w ∗ ]

Domains(and(domain(walls( Andrs'Cano' - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Domains(and(domain(walls( Andrs'Cano' ICMCB.CNRS,'University'of'Bordeaux,'France' Department'of'Materials,'ETH'Zrich,'Switzerland' References( On#the#theory#of#the#dispersion#of#magne2c#permeability#in#ferromagne2c#bodies##

Magnetic Domains and Domain Walls Bitter-Technique (ferromagnetic colloids on surfaces) Stress

Bi-Continuous Domains and Some Old Problems in Domain Theory Talk at Domains IX Klaus Keimel

DNS Requirements Large domain registrar A few hundred thousand domains using our DNS.

I. Introduction II. Collision of Domain Walls in 5D Minkowski Space III. Reheating by Collision

Hot and cold domain walls and anomaly matching Erich Poppitz oronto w/ Mohamed Anber (Lewis

Domains and Games Glynn Winskel, Cambridge Generalised domain theories: stable domain theory,

.US State of the Domain ICANN Puerto Rico 46.5% 2.1m+ 80% 59% Domains Under New Creates

Socio-Ecological Outcomes (SEO) Model Socio-Ecological Domains Inputs Outcomes Non-Cognitive

Dialogues CS294S/W Project Pitch Multi-Domain Dialogues Multiple domains in the same

Exact Result for boundaries (and domain walls) in 2d supersymmetric theory Daigo Honda

solid-on-solid models with domain walls and a reflecting end out soon arXiv:1510.00xxx [math-ph]

Identifying Transferable Information Across Domains for Cross-domain Sentiment Classification

Reduced models for domain walls in soft ferromagnetic films Lukas Dring Conference on

A simple vision of spin torques in domain walls Michel Viret, Antoine Vanhaverbeke CEA Saclay

PORTFOLIO OUR MANIFEST Walls. We have them all around. Walls - in front of or within us. There

A journey from 170 Samba3-NT4 domains to 1 unified Samba-AD domain with 8000 users Denis

Interactions between Domain Walls and Spin-polarized Currents U. Rdiger Department of Physics,

Software Testing Lecture 6 Input Domain Modelling Justin Pearson 2019 1 / 37 Input Domains

Gravitational effects of domain walls on primordial quantum fluctuations Chih-Hung Wang 1.

DNS Security DDOS TLS Top Level Domains 2020 TTL QPS Risk FQDN plan IPv4 Sub Domain

Quadrature Domains in Complex Variables Alan Legg Department of Mathematical Sciences, IPFW

PPG-ORACLE TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT Implementing Multiple Sites Single Domain Vs Sub-Domains

Recent Developments in the Domain Name Space Interna'onalized

Features of edge states and domain walls in chiral superconductors Manfred Sigrist NQS2017, YITP