direct computation of knot floer homology and the upsilon
play

Direct computation of knot Floer homology and the Upsilon invariant - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Direct computation of knot Floer homology and the Upsilon invariant Taketo Sano, joint work with Kouki Sato The University of Tokyo 2019-12-20 1/23 Overview knot homology theory knot concordance invariant knot Floer homology Tau invariant


  1. Direct computation of knot Floer homology and the Upsilon invariant Taketo Sano, joint work with Kouki Sato The University of Tokyo 2019-12-20 1/23

  2. Overview knot homology theory knot concordance invariant knot Floer homology Tau invariant HFK ( K ) τ ( K ) Vk sequence { V k } Upsilon invariant Υ K ( t ) 2/23

  3. I will describe algorithms for computing the G 0 invariant, which is introduced by Kouki Sato. As an application, we obtain algorithms for computing knot concordance invariants such as: 1. τ invariant , a homomorphism from Conc ( S 3 ) to Z , 2. V k sequence , determines the d -invariants of S 3 p / q ( K ) , p / q > 0 , 3. Υ invariant , a homomorphism from Conc ( S 3 ) to PL ([0 , 2] , R ) . Main Result We have determined Υ for almost all (except for 5) knots with crossing number up to 11, including 39 knots whose values have been unknown. ∗ The paper is currently in progress. 3/23

  4. Combinatorial knot Floer homology Knot Floer homology HFK is a knot homology theory, originated from the Heegaard Floer homology. Although HFK involves heavy analytic machineries, a purely combinatorial description was lately found. It uses the grid diagram for the construction, hence also called the grid homology . Figure 1: Grid diagram and the corresponding knot 4/23

  5. Construction of the chain complex (sketch) Let G be a grid diagram of a knot, and N be its grid number. The complex C − ( G ) is a finitely generated free module over F 2 [ U 1 , · · · , U N ], where: ◮ the generators { x } are given by permutations of length N . (Each x can be drawn as N -tuple of points on the lattice), ◮ the homological degree of x is given by the Maslov function M G ( x ), with each factor U i contributing to degree − 2, and ◮ the differential ∂ : C − k ( G ) → C − k − 1 ( G ) is given by � � 1 · · · U ε N U ε 1 ∂ x = N y y r ∈ Rect o ( x , y ) where r runs over the empty rectangles connecting x to y , and the exponents ε 1 , . . . , ε N ∈ { 0 , 1 } are given by counting the number of intersections of r and � ’s. 5/23

  6. � � U ε 1 1 · · · U ε N ∂ x = N y y r ∈ Rect o ( x , y ) r = y = x 6/23

  7. Computing H − ∗ ( G ) algorithmically Since the ground ring F 2 [ U 1 , · · · , U N ] is not a field (nor a PID), we cannot use computational methods to calculate the homology. However, since the generators are finite and deg U i = − 2, we may regard each k -th chain module C − k ( G ) as a finitely generated free F 2 -module with generators of the form: ✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿ U a 1 1 · · · U a N deg x − 2 � N x where i a i = k . With these inflated generators , it becomes possible to compute the homology group H − k ( G ) for each k ∈ Z . 7/23

  8. Example ( G = 3 1 , N = 5) k -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 # { x } 2 10 27 40 30 10 1 rank C − 622 360 192 90 35 10 1 k rank H − 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 k Example ( G = 6 1 , N = 8) k -11 ... -3 -2 -1 0 1 # { x } 1 ... 8,379 4,949 1,873 402 36 rank C − 5,321,071 ... 24,659 8,165 2,161 402 36 k rank H − 0 ... 0 1 0 1 0 k # of inflated generators explodes as k decreases! 8/23

  9. Proposition ∗ ( G ) ∼ H − = F 2 [ U 1 ] . The homology does not provide any information specific to the knot. 9/23

  10. Bifiltration on C − ∗ ( G ) C − ∗ ( G ) admits a bifiltration . Namely, every inflated generator U a 1 1 · · · U a N N x ∈ C − ∗ ( G ) , is assigned a bidegree ( i , j ) ∈ Z 2 as ◮ i = − a 1 , the exponent of U 1 in its coefficient, and ◮ j = A G ( x ) − � ℓ a ℓ , where A G is the Alexander function . The first degree i is called the algebraic degree , and the second j is called the Alexander degree . It can be proved that ∂ is non-increasing for both i and j . ✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿ Important knot concordance invariants such as τ, V k and Υ can be obtained from this bifiltration. In year 2019, K. Sato introduced a new invariant G 0 ( K ) that unifies these invariants. 10/23

  11. Closed region and Z 2 -filtration We call a subset R ⊂ Z 2 an closed region iff: If ( i , j ) ∈ R and ( i ′ ≤ i , j ′ ≤ j ) then ( i ′ , j ′ ) ∈ R . For any closed region R , there is a corresponding subcomplex F R C − := Span F 2 { z ∈ C − | ( i ( z ) , j ( z )) ∈ R } where z is a monomial of the form z = U a 1 1 · · · U a N N x . For another closed region R ′ ⊂ R , we have F R ′ C − ⊂ F R C − . The differential ∂ is closed in F R C − . Thus C − ∗ ( G ) admits a Z 2 -filtration with respect to the partial order ≤ . ✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿ 11/23

  12. C − j 0 ( G ) R R ′ i 12/23

  13. The invariant G 0 ( K ) = F 2 . The set G (0) 0 ( G ) ∼ Recall that H − 0 ( K ) is defined as the set of minimal closed regions, each containing a homological generator of H − 0 ( G ), namely, � ∃ z ∈ F R C − 0 ( G ) s.t. 0 � = [ z ] ∈ H − 0 ( G ) , R ∈ G (0) 0 ( K ) ⇔ R is minimal w.r.t. the above property. G 0 ( K ) is defined similarly, by regarding homological generators of homological degree ≤ 0. Theorem (Sato ’19, Section 5.1) G 0 ( K ) is a knot concordance invariant. 13/23

  14. Theorem (Sato ’19, Prop. 5.17) G 0 ( K ) determines τ, V k and Υ . j j V k k i i τ Figure 2: Determining τ, V k and Υ from G 0 ( K ). 14/23

  15. Main result Theorem (S.-Sato) There is an algorithm for computing G 0 ( K ) . Corollary There is an algorithm for computing τ, V k and Υ . As an application, we determined Υ for almost all knots of crossing number up to 11, including 39 knots whose Υ have been unknown. The following five are the uncomputed ones, due to computational cost. 10 152 , 11 n 31 , 11 n 47 , 11 n 77 , 11 n 9 . 15/23

  16. Computation of G 0 ( K ) First we compute one homological generator z ∈ C − 0 ( G ), i.e. a 0 ( G ) ∼ cycle whose homology class generates H − = F 2 . For any closed region R , it contains a homological iff: ∃ c ∈ C 1 s . t . z − ∂ c ∈ F R C 0 . Let Q R C ∗ = C ∗ / F R C ∗ , then the above condition is equivalent to: ∃ c ∈ Q R C 1 s . t . ∂ c = z ∈ Q R C 0 Each Q R C i is a finite dimensional F 2 -vector space. We represent ∂ by a matrix A , then the c above corresponds to the solution x of the linear system: Ax = vec ( z ) . 16/23

  17. We minimize the region containing z by “sweeping” its components into a smaller region. The invariant G 0 is the set of all such minimal regions. ∂ � � � � � R ′ R c � � � � z � � � � � z ′ sweep 17/23

  18. Finite candidate regions From Sato’s theorem: − g 4 ( K )[ T 2 , 3 ] ν + ≤ [ K ] ν + ≤ g 4 ( K )[ T 2 , 3 ] ν + , we can tell that for any R ∈ G 0 ( K ), any of its corner ( i , j ) satisfies | i + j | ≤ g 4 ( K ) ( ij ≥ 0) , | i − j | ≤ g 3 ( K ) ( ij < 0) . Thus the set of all closed regions satisfying these conditions is finite, which we can take as a set of candidate regions including G 0 ( K ). 18/23

  19. j g 3 g 4 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � i � � � � � � � � � � � � − g 4 − g 3 19/23

  20. The algorithm (sketch) Step 1. Compute one homological generator z ∈ C 0 ( G ). Step 2. Setup the candidate regions. Step 3. Choose one candidate R . Take the basis of Q R C 0 = C 0 / F R C 0 by modding out the generators of C 0 that lie in R . Step 4. Compute the matrix A representing the differential ∂ R : Q R C 1 → Q R C 0 . Step 5. Check whether Ax = vec ( z R ) has a solution. If it does, mark R as realizable. If it doesn’t, discard all regions that are included in R . Goto Step 3 if unchecked candidates exist. Step 6. Collect the realizable R ’s that are minimal w.r.t. the inclusion ⊂ , and we obtain G (0) 0 ( K ). Continue the same process for higher shift numbers. 20/23

  21. DEMO. 21/23

  22. Thank you! 22/23

  23. References I [1] M. Khovanov. “A categorification of the Jones polynomial”. In: Duke Math. J. 101.3 (2000), pp. 359–426. [2] E. S. Lee. “An endomorphism of the Khovanov invariant”. In: Adv. Math. 197.2 (2005), pp. 554–586. [3] J. Rasmussen. “Khovanov homology and the slice genus”. In: Invent. Math. 182.2 (2010), pp. 419–447. [4] C. Manolescu, P. Ozsv´ ath, and S. Sarkar. “A combinatorial description of knot Floer homology”. In: Ann. of Math. (2) 169.2 (2009), pp. 633–660. [5] C. Manolescu et al. “On combinatorial link Floer homology”. In: Geom. Topol. 11 (2007), pp. 2339–2412. K. Sato. The ν + -equivalence classes of genus one knots. 2019. [6] arXiv: 1907.09116 [math.GT] . 23/23

Recommend


More recommend