different cuts to present
play

Different cuts to present Josh Albert Notable Points about 07a MC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Different cuts to present Josh Albert Notable Points about 07a MC The cut on outer detector hits has been changed from nhitac<10 to nhitac<16, this is to bring it in line with SK-III standards. Changing the nhitac cut has


  1. Different cuts to present Josh Albert

  2. Notable Points about 07a MC • The cut on outer detector hits has been changed from nhitac<10 to nhitac<16, this is to bring it in line with SK-III standards. • Changing the nhitac cut has virtually no effect on sensitivity • Mine-san made a new version of POLfit to reduce backgrounds with minimal loss of signal. • All sensitivity plots are for 90% one sided confidence level

  3. Old POLfit exposure plots !"#$%&$'()*+$,-+.$+-.(/-0 !"#$%&$'()*+$,-+.$+-.(/-0 !"#$%&$'()*$+,-./$/01,203 !"#$%&$'()*$+,-./$/01,203 9 @ ?:',-.*,=@$1++(+$A+*@,=(< "B$':'$9 ! '=0-0 $'-<'=,=/=,: $+05+()(2()A 9#B$':'$9 ! '=0-0 ! 9 9# 7#B$':'$9 ! '=0-0 ! @ @" 9> @B ! ! CA+)01.)(4$D//,/$E/.4)(,5 $7$ $<$ 7 < '=< +(5 ! 7 9# 5,$+A+$@ ! +(303 B"#$+A+$@ ! +(303 >"#$+A+$@ ! +(303 ! > ! < 9# @" ! 9 < 9# @" 9 @ @" 7 123('4+-56778"%,$2$9:-*+; 8,'0/$9:;6$'()*$9<<=>:)$?$@" $+04,53+6

  4. Old POLfit sensitivity plots ,-.!/0! ,-.!/0! !"#$%&'&(&') !"#$%&'&(&') ,-.!/0! ,-.!/0! !"#$%&'&(&') !"#$%&'&(&') ! ! ! ! ! * *- *+ *+ *+ *+ 6 ")%'#57'&8!9::;:!<:78'&;$ ")%'#78'&2!9::;:!<:82'&;$ 5 =.!%)%!* ! %&>#> 5.!%)%!* ! %&=#= *-.!%)%!* ! %&>#> *-.!%)%!* ! %&=#= ! 1 *- 4 1-.!%)%!* ! %&>#> 1-.!%)%!* ! %&=#= 2 1 !3#4 23 *+ " + 1 !5 " ! + *- 1 * ! 6 - *- ! + ! + ! 1 ! * ! 1 ! * *- *- *- *- *- *- * * 1 1 %&$ !1! !%#$%&'&(&') %&$ !1! !%#$%&'&(&') ! ! *+ *+

  5. New POLfit exposure plots !"#$%&$'()*+$,-+.$+-.(/-0 !"#$%&$'()*+$,-+.$+-.(/-0 !"#$%&$'()*$+,-./$/01,203 !"#$%&$'()*$+,-./$/01,203 9 @ ?:',-.*,=@$1++(+$A+*@,=(< "B$':'$9 ! '=0-0 $'-<'=,=/=,: $+05+()(2()A 9#B$':'$9 ! '=0-0 ! 9 9# 7#B$':'$9 ! '=0-0 ! @ @" 9> @B ! ! CA+)01.)(4$D//,/$E/.4)(,5 $7$ $<$ 7 < '=< +(5 ! 7 9# 5,$+A+$@ ! +(303 B"#$+A+$@ ! +(303 >"#$+A+$@ ! +(303 ! > ! < 9# @" ! 9 < 9# @" 9 @ @" 7 123('4+-56778"%,$2$9:-*+; 8,'0/$9:;6$'()*$9<<=>:)$?$@" $+04,53+6

  6. New POLfit sensitivity plots ,-.!/0! ,-.!/0! !"#$%&'&(&') !"#$%&'&(&') ,-.!/0! ,-.!/0! !"#$%&'&(&') !"#$%&'&(&') ! ! ! ! ! * *- *+ *+ *+ *+ 6 ")%'#57'&8!9::;:!<:78'&;$ ")%'#78'&2!9::;:!<:82'&;$ 5 =.!%)%!* ! %&>#> 5.!%)%!* ! %&=#= *-.!%)%!* ! %&>#> *-.!%)%!* ! %&=#= ! 1 *- 4 1-.!%)%!* ! %&>#> 1-.!%)%!* ! %&=#= 2 1 !3#4 23 *+ " + 1 !5 " ! + *- 1 * ! 6 - *- ! + ! + ! 1 ! * ! 1 ! * *- *- *- *- *- *- * * 1 1 %&$ !1! !%#$%&'&(&') %&$ !1! !%#$%&'&(&') ! ! *+ *+

  7. Table of cuts with new POLfit numu + numubar Background nue Signal New POLfit CC NC CC NC CC total 5460.2 152% 5614.4 196% 254.1 154% 95.52 182% 489.5 153% truefid 3537.9 98% 3644.4 128% 165 100% 61.61 117% 316.2 99% recfid 3598.6 100% 2857.4 100.0% 165.3 52.49 319.8 100% 100.0% 100% nhitac 2837.2 78.8% 2841.9 99.5% 160.9 97.4% 52.09 99.2% 314.5 98.3% evis 2502.5 69.5% 896.0 31.4% 159.1 96.2% 26.16 49.8% 304.9 95.3% onering 1364.5 37.9% 218.13 7.6% 95.87 58.0% 6.508 12.4% 266 83.3% elike 50.96 1.42% 161.42 5.65% 94.86 4.562 262.0 57.39% 8.69% 81.93% nomuedcy 17.31 0.48% 144.11 5.04% 80.13 48.48% 3.973 7.57% 242.6 75.86% cosine 4.30 0.12% 94.63 3.31% 40.55 24.54% 2.400 4.57% 212.9 66.55% pi0mass 3.49 0.10% 24.754 0.87% 31.74 19.20% 0.684 1.30% 191.6 59.91% pi0like 1.18 20.52 30.28 18.32% 0.5158 185.9 0.03% 0.72% 0.98% 58.12% recnuE 0.432 0.01% 9.703 0.34% 15.42 9.33% 0.2122 0.40% 142.8 44.66% *Histograms showing each cut can be found in the backup slides

  8. K2K-style cuts. • remove cosine cut • remove pi0 likelihood cut • make pi0mass cut p dependant: • pi0mass increases linearly from 50 to 100 for momentum between 0 and 300 MeV. • For p>300 MeV, the cut is simply pi0mass<100.

  9. K2K-style cut on signal POLfit π 0 mass vs. p ( ν μ →ν e 1-ring e-like) pi0mass vs p (CCQE signal 1Re) pi0mass vs p (CCQE signal 1Re) 300 Cut 3 10 250 π 0 mass (MeV) 200 2 10 150 100 10 Keep 50 0 1 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 p (MeV)

  10. K2K-style cut on ν μ - NC background POLfit π 0 mass vs. p ( ν μ 1-ring e-like) pi0mass vs p (NC numu only 1Re) pi0mass vs p (NC numu only 1Re) 300 5 Cut 10 250 π 0 mass (MeV) 4 10 200 3 10 150 2 10 100 10 Keep 50 0 1 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 p (MeV)

  11. K2K style exposure plots !"#$%&$'()*+$,-+.$+-.(/-0 !"#$%&$'()*+$,-+.$+-.(/-0 !"#$%&$'()*$+,-./$/01,203 !"#$%&$'()*$+,-./$/01,203 9 @ ?:',-.*,=@$1++(+$A+*@,=(< "B$':'$9 ! '=0-0 $'-<'=,=/=,: $+05+()(2()A 9#B$':'$9 ! '=0-0 ! 9 9# 7#B$':'$9 ! '=0-0 ! @ @" 9> @B ! ! CA+)01.)(4$D//,/$E/.4)(,5 $7$ $<$ 7 < '=< +(5 ! 7 9# 5,$+A+$@ ! +(303 B"#$+A+$@ ! +(303 >"#$+A+$@ ! +(303 ! > ! < 9# @" ! 9 < 9# @" 9 @ @" 7 123('4+-56778"%,$2$9:-*+; 8,'0/$9:;6$'()*$9<<=>:)$?$@" $+04,53+6

  12. K2K style sensitivity plots ,-.!/0! ,-.!/0! !"#$%&'&(&') !"#$%&'&(&') ,-.!/0! ,-.!/0! !"#$%&'&(&') !"#$%&'&(&') ! ! ! ! ! * *- *+ *+ *+ *+ 6 ")%'#57'&8!9::;:!<:78'&;$ ")%'#78'&2!9::;:!<:82'&;$ 5 =.!%)%!* ! %&>#> 5.!%)%!* ! %&=#= *-.!%)%!* ! %&>#> *-.!%)%!* ! %&=#= ! 1 *- 4 1-.!%)%!* ! %&>#> 1-.!%)%!* ! %&=#= 2 1 !3#4 23 *+ " + 1 !5 " ! + *- 1 * ! 6 - *- ! + ! + ! 1 ! * ! 1 ! * *- *- *- *- *- *- * * 1 1 %&$ !1! !%#$%&'&(&') %&$ !1! !%#$%&'&(&') ! ! *+ *+

  13. Cuts A la Josh • Cosine cut is still eliminated • pi0likelihood cut is back • the k2k style pi0mass cut is now: • pi0mass increases linearly from 50 to 100 for momentum between 0 and 300 MeV. • For p>300 MeV, the cut is simply pi0mass<100.

  14. A La Josh exposure plots !"#$%&$'()*+$,-+.$+-.(/-0 !"#$%&$'()*+$,-+.$+-.(/-0 !"#$%&$'()*$+,-./$/01,203 !"#$%&$'()*$+,-./$/01,203 9 @ ?:',-.*,=@$1++(+$A+*@,=(< "B$':'$9 ! '=0-0 $'-<'=,=/=,: $+05+()(2()A 9#B$':'$9 ! '=0-0 ! 9 9# 7#B$':'$9 ! '=0-0 ! @ @" 9> @B ! ! CA+)01.)(4$D//,/$E/.4)(,5 $7$ $<$ 7 < '=< +(5 ! 7 9# 5,$+A+$@ ! +(303 B"#$+A+$@ ! +(303 >"#$+A+$@ ! +(303 ! > ! < 9# @" ! 9 < 9# @" 9 @ @" 7 123('4+-56778"%,$2$9:-*+; 8,'0/$9:;6$'()*$9<<=>:)$?$@" $+04,53+6

  15. A La Josh sensitivity plots ,-.!/0! ,-.!/0! !"#$%&'&(&') !"#$%&'&(&') ,-.!/0! ,-.!/0! !"#$%&'&(&') !"#$%&'&(&') ! ! ! ! ! * *- *+ *+ *+ *+ 6 ")%'#57'&8!9::;:!<:78'&;$ ")%'#78'&2!9::;:!<:82'&;$ 5 =.!%)%!* ! %&>#> 5.!%)%!* ! %&=#= *-.!%)%!* ! %&>#> *-.!%)%!* ! %&=#= ! 1 *- 4 1-.!%)%!* ! %&>#> 1-.!%)%!* ! %&=#= 2 1 !3#4 23 *+ " + 1 !5 " ! + *- 1 * ! 6 - *- ! + ! + ! 1 ! * ! 1 ! * *- *- *- *- *- *- * * 1 1 %&$ !1! !%#$%&'&(&') %&$ !1! !%#$%&'&(&') ! ! *+ *+

  16. Comparison of all Cut setups Std Cuts (Old POLfit) Std Cuts (New POLfit) K2K Style A La Josh Background Signal Background Signal Background Signal Background Signal total 11424.2 154% 489.46 155% 11424.2 154% 489.46 155% 11424.2 154% 489.46 155% 11424.2 154% 489.46 155% truefid 7408.98 100% 316.18 100% 7408.98 100% 316.18 100% 7408.98 100% 316.18 100% 7408.98 100% 316.18 100% recfid 6673.8 90% 319.84 101.2% 6673.8 90% 319.84 101.2% 6673.8 90% 319.84 101.2% 6673.8 90% 319.84 101.2% nhitac 5892.05 79.5% 314.5 5892.05 79.5% 314.5 5892.05 79.5% 314.5 5892.05 79.5% 314.5 99.5% 99.5% 99.5% 99.5% evis 3583.7 48.4% 304.92 96.4% 3583.7 48.4% 304.92 96.4% 3583.7 48.4% 304.92 96.4% 3583.7 48.4% 304.92 96.4% onering 1685 22.7% 266.43 84.3% 1685 22.7% 266.43 84.3% 1685 22.7% 266.43 84.3% 1685 22.7% 266.43 84.3% elike 311.803 4.21% 262.04 82.88% 311.803 4.21% 262.04 82.88% 311.803 4.21% 262.04 82.88% 311.803 4.21% 262.04 82.88% nomuedcy 245.518 3.31% nomuedcy 242.62 76.73% 245.518 3.31% 242.62 76.73% 245.518 3.31% 242.62 76.73% 245.518 3.31% 242.62 76.73% cosine 141.888 1.92% 212.86 67.32% 141.888 1.92% 212.86 67.32% --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- pi0mass 81.2584 1.10% 199.4 63.07% 60.6683 0.82% 191.63 60.61% 88.0654 1.19% 213.62 67.56% 88.0654 1.19% 213.62 67.56% pi0like 71.4493 0.96% 193.96 61.34% 52.4927 0.71% 185.89 58.79% --- --- --- --- 68.1092 0.92% 206.29 65.24% recnuE 33.2258 0.45% 149.09 47.15% 25.7632 0.35% 142.84 45.18% 35.4456 0.48% 163.16 51.60% 32.3071 0.44% 158.65 50.18% S 25.86 28.14 27.41 27.91 √ B • All differences are in the last 4 rows. • The new POLfit improves the ratio noticeably. S √ B • Other cut tweaks do not help as much.

Recommend


More recommend