departamento nacional de planeaci n
play

Departamento Nacional de Planeacin www.dnp.gov.co NATURAL CAPITAL - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Departamento Nacional de Planeacin www.dnp.gov.co NATURAL CAPITAL ACCOUNTING FOR BETTER POLICY WAVES NCA Policy Forum German Romero DNP @DNP_colombia DNP_colombia 2016 dnp.gov.co Fotografa: semana.com AGENDA 1. Context of Water Fees


  1. Departamento Nacional de Planeación www.dnp.gov.co

  2. NATURAL CAPITAL ACCOUNTING FOR BETTER POLICY WAVES NCA Policy Forum German Romero DNP @DNP_colombia DNP_colombia 2016 dnp.gov.co Fotografía: semana.com

  3. AGENDA 1. Context of Water Fees in Colombia 2. Computable General Equilibrium Model for Water Accounting (MEGA- German Romero WUF) DNP @simongaviria 3. Results SimonGaviriaM 4. Conclusions Fotografía: semana.com

  4. Contex of the Water Fee Decree 155. Ar8cle 3 Law 99 (Ar8cle 43- WUF) Ar8cle 4 Decree 2811 MADS Decree 4742 Ar8cle 7-12 Law 1450 Law 1151 Ar8cle SENA 108 Ar8cle 18 1974 2005 2007 2011 1993 2004 1972 1991 1995 2004 2006 2010 2014 Resolu8on 240 Resolu8on 872 IDEAM NDP (2014-2018) Resolu8on 865 Na8onal Policy for Green Growth Chapter Code of Renewable Colombian Resolu8on 866 Integrated Water Natural Resources and Cons8tu8on, Chapter 3, Title II Management Resource Environmental Protec8on Fuente: BID-CEPAL 2012

  5. Contex of the Water Fee in Colombia • Water resources protec8on requires COP$412 • People and firms that use water for public or private billions annually pesos to finance 46% of these purposes will pay a fee set by the Na8onal Government. which would guarantee the demand for water resources • The revenues shall be used to pay for the cost of water resources protec8on. • Nowadays revenues from the Water Fee amount to only COP$21 billions pesos, that is 5% of required. Fuente: BID-CEPAL 2012

  6. Water Fee in other countries The current economic signal is very low: Colombia Costa Rica Brasil Economic sector Current (COP$/m3) Propouse (COP$/ (COP$/m3) (COP$/m3) m3) Agricultural 0,84 3,00 5,27 4,63 0,84 Households 10,00 5,97 9,26 Others 0,84 10,00 10,79 555,50 Tomado de MADS (2016) y Ecosimple (2014), Propuesta de ajuste de tarifas mínimas de la tasa por u8lización de agua; citando a MADS (2013), Oficina de Negocios Verdes y Sostenibles

  7. CGE Model • We use the static versión of MEG4C. It Trade include 7 sectors and SAM 2012 • Imports • Exports • MEG4C allows a quantification of direct and indirect impacts of change in Water Fee Public Taxes Expenditur e • It’s based on the National Account Government Sectors Households (DANE) and the National Natural Accounts (WAVES DANE) Taxes Public Expenditur e

  8. CGE model include WUF • Imports Trade • Exports Public Taxes Expenditure Government Sectors Households Government WF WF WF Taxes Public Expenditure Expenditure WF projects

  9. Objetive to the modelling A proposal to modify the WUF was included in the model increasing the minimum fee to $10/m3, but at the same 8me considering in the es8ma8on a use factor of 0,3 for agriculture and of 1 in the other sectors and households (EIECC 2016).

  10. Changes in production Change in produc8on Change in produc8on AlternaSve Base Scenario Scenario 0.10% Sector Change (Trillions of (Trillions of COP) COP) 0.05% Agriculture 73,77 73,68 -0,12% Electricity 27,17 27,16 -0,05% 0.00% Mining 73,21 73,27 0,09% -0.05% Industry/Commerce 333,22 333,16 -0,02% -0.10% Services 68,54 68,52 -0,03% Others (use water) 131,31 131,36 0,04% -0.15% Others (without 476,78 476,69 -0,02% agrop electr indycom otros servs na miner informaSon Fuente: Cálculos propios

  11. Results Summary of impacts and sectorial efficiency m 3 ‘ savings’ m 3 used for ProducSon due to a Supply each million $/m 3 Sector/Crop (Billions of million of Hm3/year of final pesos) pesos of final producSon producSon 221,8 163 $ 735 1360,5 1,63 Cacao 1793,6 1540 $ 859 1164,7 1,40 Palm 1476,2 1435 $ 972 1028,7 1,23 Caña Azúcar 7990,8 9050 $ 1.133 883,0 1,06 Ganadería 1778,1 2218 $ 1.247 801,7 0,96 Arroz Paddy Total 9340,6 29403 $ 3.148 317,7 0,38 Agricultura 221,2 1995 $ 9.019 110,9 0,13 Papa 39,6 888 $ 22.452 44,5 0,05 Frijol 1,1 150 $ 130.919 7,6 0,01 Oleaginosas

  12. Conclusions � Increasing WF brings distor8ons to the economy that turn into losses in produc8on and household welfare and rising prices. � The agricultural sector shows major impacts, even WF for this sector has the lowest increase. � The water account was needed to build the WSAM for the CGE model. � Natural Accoun8ng brings key informa8on for modelling and policy analysis

  13. Departamento Nacional de Planeación www.dnp.gov.co

Recommend


More recommend