decomposition rank of uhf absorbing c algebras
play

Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C -algebras Joint work with - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C -algebras Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C -algebras Joint work with Hiroki Matui 12, Mar., 2013. Sde Boker . . . . . . Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C -algebras Murray-von


  1. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Joint work with Hiroki Matui 12, Mar., 2013. Sde Boker . . . . . .

  2. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Murray-von Neumann equivalence Murray-von Neumann equivalence M : a finite von Neumann algebra, p, q: two projections in M . If τ ( p ) = τ ( q ) , for any tracial state τ of M , then there exists v ∈ M such that vv ∗ = q . v ∗ v = p , This condition plays an essential role in the classification theorem of injective factors. . . . . . .

  3. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Murray-von Neumann equivalence Murray-von Neumann equivalence and AFD A. Connes proved that any injective factor with a separable predual is approximately finite dimensional (AFD), by using his deep study of automorphisms. And he classified injective factors of type II and type III λ , λ ̸ = 1 . . . . . . .

  4. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Murray-von Neumann equivalence Murray-von Neumann equivalence and AFD A. Connes proved that any injective factor with a separable predual is approximately finite dimensional (AFD), by using his deep study of automorphisms. And he classified injective factors of type II and type III λ , λ ̸ = 1 . U. Haagerup gave an alternative proof (injectivity ⇒ AFD) without using automorphisms, and classified the injective factor of thpe III 1 . . . . . . .

  5. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Murray-von Neumann equivalence Murray-von Neumann equivalence and AFD A. Connes proved that any injective factor with a separable predual is approximately finite dimensional (AFD), by using his deep study of automorphisms. And he classified injective factors of type II and type III λ , λ ̸ = 1 . U. Haagerup gave an alternative proof (injectivity ⇒ AFD) without using automorphisms, and classified the injective factor of thpe III 1 . S. Popa also gave another short proof by using excisions of amenable traces. In Connes and Haagerup’s argument, they showed AFD by using a partial isometry v which induces the Murray-von Neumann equivalence. . . . . . .

  6. ( ) Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Murray-von Neumann equivalence Murray-von Neumann equivalence for C ∗ -algebras Theorem ( 1980. Cuntz-Pedersen. ) Let A be a C ∗ -algebra, p , q projections in A . If τ ( p ) = τ ( q ) for any tracial state τ of A . Then ∃ v i ∈ A , i = 1 , 2 , ..., N , such that ∑ ∑ v ∗ i v i = p , v i v ∗ i = q . . . . . . .

  7. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Murray-von Neumann equivalence Murray-von Neumann equivalence for C ∗ -algebras Theorem ( 1980. Cuntz-Pedersen. ) Let A be a C ∗ -algebra, p , q projections in A . If τ ( p ) = τ ( q ) for any tracial state τ of A . Then ∃ v i ∈ A , i = 1 , 2 , ..., N , such that ∑ ∑ v ∗ i v i = p , v i v ∗ i = q . Lemma ( 2013. Matui-Sato ) Let A be a C ∗ -algebra with strict comparison for projections, p , q projections in A . If τ ( p ) = τ ( q ) for any tracial state τ of A . Then ∃ v i ∈ A ⊗ M n , i = 1 , 2 , such that ∑ ∑ v ∗ i v i ≈ 4 / n p ⊗ 1 n , v i v ∗ i ≈ 4 / n q ⊗ 1 n . . . . . . .

  8. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Murray-von Neumann equivalence Main theorem Theorem ( 2013. H. Matui - Y. Sato ) Let A be a unital separable, simple, C ∗ -algebra with a unique tracial state. Then A is nuclear, with strict comparison, and is quasidiagonal ⇐ ⇒ dr( A ) < ∞ , (in particular dr( A ) ≤ 3 ). . . . . . .

  9. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Murray-von Neumann equivalence Main theorem Theorem ( 2013. H. Matui - Y. Sato ) Let A be a unital separable, simple, C ∗ -algebra with a unique tracial state. Then A is nuclear, with strict comparison, and is quasidiagonal ⇐ ⇒ dr( A ) < ∞ , (in particular dr( A ) ≤ 3 ). If A is in the above theorem, ⇒ A ⊗ Z ∼ A has strict comparison ⇐ = A . . . . . . .

  10. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Murray-von Neumann equivalence Main theorem Theorem ( 2013. H. Matui - Y. Sato ) Let A be a unital separable, simple, C ∗ -algebra with a unique tracial state. Then A is nuclear, with strict comparison, and is quasidiagonal ⇐ ⇒ dr( A ) < ∞ , (in particular dr( A ) ≤ 3 ). If A is in the above theorem, ⇒ A ⊗ Z ∼ A has strict comparison ⇐ = A . → ∏ M k n / ⊕ M k n , A is quasidiagonal ⇐ ⇒ A ֒ D. Voiculescu. . . . . . .

  11. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Decomposition rank Decomposition rank Definition (2002. E. Kirchberg - W. Winter.) Let A be a separable C ∗ -algebra. A has decomposition rank at most N , dr( A ) ≤ N , if → ⊕ N ∃ φ n : A − i =0 M k i , n : c.p.c, ∃ ψ i , n : M k i , n − → A : order zero (disjointness preserving), c.p.c such that ∑ ψ i , n is also contractive, ∥ ( ∑ ψ i , n ) ◦ φ n ( a ) − a ∥ → 0 , ∀ a ∈ A , where we simply write ( ∑ ψ i , n )( ⊕ x i ) := ∑ ψ i , n ( x i ) . . . . . . .

  12. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Decomposition rank Decomposition rank Definition (2002. E. Kirchberg - W. Winter.) Let A be a separable C ∗ -algebra. A has decomposition rank at most N , dr( A ) ≤ N , if → ⊕ N ∃ φ n : A − i =0 M k i , n : c.p.c, ∃ ψ i , n : M k i , n − → A : order zero (disjointness preserving), c.p.c such that ∑ ψ i , n is also contractive, ∥ ( ∑ ψ i , n ) ◦ φ n ( a ) − a ∥ → 0 , ∀ a ∈ A , where we simply write ( ∑ ψ i , n )( ⊕ x i ) := ∑ ψ i , n ( x i ) . dr( A ) < ∞ = ⇒ A is quasidiagonal, Kirchberg-Winter. . . . . . .

  13. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Decomposition rank Decomposition rank Definition (2002. E. Kirchberg - W. Winter.) Let A be a separable C ∗ -algebra. A has decomposition rank at most N , dr( A ) ≤ N , if → ⊕ N ∃ φ n : A − i =0 M k i , n : c.p.c, ∃ ψ i , n : M k i , n − → A : order zero (disjointness preserving), c.p.c such that ∑ ψ i , n is also contractive, ∥ ( ∑ ψ i , n ) ◦ φ n ( a ) − a ∥ → 0 , ∀ a ∈ A , where we simply write ( ∑ ψ i , n )( ⊕ x i ) := ∑ ψ i , n ( x i ) . dr( A ) < ∞ = ⇒ A is quasidiagonal, Kirchberg-Winter. ⇒ A ⊗ Z ∼ dr( A ) < ∞ = = A , 2007 Winter. . . . . . .

  14. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Decomposition rank Decomposition rank Definition (2002. E. Kirchberg - W. Winter.) Let A be a separable C ∗ -algebra. A has decomposition rank at most N , dr( A ) ≤ N , if → ⊕ N ∃ φ n : A − i =0 M k i , n : c.p.c, ∃ ψ i , n : M k i , n − → A : order zero (disjointness preserving), c.p.c such that ∑ ψ i , n is also contractive, ∥ ( ∑ ψ i , n ) ◦ φ n ( a ) − a ∥ → 0 , ∀ a ∈ A , where we simply write ( ∑ ψ i , n )( ⊕ x i ) := ∑ ψ i , n ( x i ) . dr( A ) < ∞ = ⇒ A is quasidiagonal, Kirchberg-Winter. ⇒ A ⊗ Z ∼ dr( A ) < ∞ = = A , 2007 Winter. A ⊗Z ∼ = A = ⇒ A has strict comparison, 2001 M. Rørdam. . . . . . .

  15. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Decomposition rank Main theorem Theorem ( 2013. H. Matui - Y. Sato ) Let A be a unital separable, simple, C ∗ -algebra with a unique tracial state. Then A is nuclear, with strict comparison, and is quasidiagonal ⇐ ⇒ dr( A ) < ∞ , (in particular dr( A ) ≤ 3 ). If A is in the above theorem, ⇒ A ⊗ Z ∼ A has strict comparison ⇐ = A . → ∏ M k n / ⊕ M k n , A is quasidiagonal ⇐ ⇒ A ֒ D. Voiculescu. . . . . . .

  16. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Decomposition rank Toms - Winter conjecture Conjecture ( 2009. A. Toms, W. Winter. ) Let A be a unital separable simple nuclear finite C ∗ -algebra with infinite-dimension. Then the following are equivalent. (i) A ⊗ Z ∼ = A . . . . . . .

  17. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Decomposition rank Toms - Winter conjecture Conjecture ( 2009. A. Toms, W. Winter. ) Let A be a unital separable simple nuclear finite C ∗ -algebra with infinite-dimension. Then the following are equivalent. (i) A ⊗ Z ∼ = A . (ii) A has the strict comparison. (i) ⇒ (ii) 2001. M. R ø rdam. . . . . . .

  18. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Decomposition rank Toms - Winter conjecture Conjecture ( 2009. A. Toms, W. Winter. ) Let A be a unital separable simple nuclear finite C ∗ -algebra with infinite-dimension. Then the following are equivalent. (i) A ⊗ Z ∼ = A . (ii) A has the strict comparison. (iii) dr( A ) < ∞ (i) ⇒ (ii) 2001. M. R ø rdam. (iii) ⇒ (i) 2009. W. Winter. Corollary of the main theorem Suppose that A is a unital separable simple nuclear C ∗ -algebra. Assume that A is quasidiagonal and with a unique tracial state. Then (ii) = ⇒ (iii). . . . . . .

  19. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Decomposition rank Without Q.D. Here we assume that the T. W. conjecture has been completely proved without Q.D. For a unital separable simple nuclear C ∗ -algebra A it follows that A ⊗ Z also absorbs Z ((i) in the T. W. conjecture.), . . . . . .

Recommend


More recommend