Data Presentation Downers Grove Grade School District 58 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Data Presentation Downers Grove Grade School District 58 Curriculum Workshop Matthew E. Rich, Ed. D. October 24, 2016

2016 - 17 Strategic Goals & Action Plan ● Differentiated & Flexible Instruction ● Student Engagement in and Ownership of Learning ● Programs of Instruction

2016 - 17 Strategic Goals & Action Plan

2016 - 17 Strategic Goals & Action Plan (cont.)

School Improvement Plans Action-Oriented, Simplified School Improvement Plans ○ Focus on Academic Growth and Ongoing Instructional Improvement ○ Emphasis on Staff Dialogue and Work on the Learning Improvement ○ Simple Paperwork ○ Links District Goals, Common Core State Standards, & Principal Evaluation Framework

School Improvement Plans (cont.) Each School Improvement Plan Includes: ● 3 Academic Goals: Reading, Math & SEL ● Action Plans to Accomplish Goals (as developed by Building Leadership Teams) Questions or Additional Information on Specific School Improvement Plans?

Rising Star Continuous Improvement Plan ● Only Required for District Title I Plan ● Areas Completed to Date: ○ IA07- In collaboration with its schools, the district will set district & school achievement targets for all students and for subgroups.

Rising Star Continuous Improvement Plan (cont.) ● Areas of Continued Development: ○ D7- The district will monitor to ensure the intended curriculum is implemented with fidelity. ○ IC05- The district will provide a cohesive district curriculum guide aligned with state standards or otherwise places curricular expectations on the school

Title I ● Aimed at Buildings with Low Income ● Services Not Limited to Low Income Students ● Services Identified for Reading and Math ● Schools Designated as Title I ○ El Sierra, Henry Puffer, Indian Trail, & Kingsley ● 2016-17 Allotment - $288,817 ● Carryover from 2015-16 - $107,773 ● Total Available Funds for Title I - $396,590

Title I (cont.) Title I Expenditure Allocations 2016-17 ● Additional Non-Certified Staff in Title I Buildings - $208,226 (salaries & benefits) ● Support for Homeless Children - $99,750 (transportation, clothes, materials, OKEEP) ● Additional Instructional Resources for Title I Buildings - $88,614 ● None of our local private schools have opted to utilize Title I funds at this time.

Title II ● Aimed at increasing teacher quality. Funds are for professional development in all schools throughout district. ● 2016-17 Allotment - $119,227 ● Carryover from 2014-15 - $56,055 ● Total Available Funds for Title II - $175,282

Title II (cont.) Title II Expenditure Allocations 2014-15 ● Professional Development in Math and MS content areas (ELA, Math, Science)- (Substitutes & Consultant Fees) $117,850 ● Professional Development in Core Content Areas, SEL (Conferences & Subs) - $12,582 ● Private School Share - $28,850 ● Institute Day Trainings & 1st and 2nd Year Teacher trainings - $16,000

FALL MAP Reading

Fall Reading Median Percentile Comparisons Reading Fall 13 Fall 14 Fall 15 Fall 16 National Grade Median comparison Kindergarten 66 60 69 65 50 1st 61 61 62 67 50 2nd 70 65 70 75 50 3rd 68 68 68 73 50 4th 72 64 69 73 50 5th 66 66 68 74 50 6th 70 65 72 74 50 7th 71 71 73 76 50 8th 68 72 73 74 50

Reading Cohort Achievement Comparison (District Median Student Performance)

Reading Growth Comparisons Reading % OPP Fall 15 to Spr National Reading % Fall 15 to National (Percent of 16 Average Meets Spr 16 Average Total Projected Target Points Earned) Kdg 57.4 50 Kdg 109.7 100 1st 71.6 50 1st 122.7 100 2nd 61.7 50 2nd 120 100 3rd 56.5 50 3rd 108.7 100 4th 65.2 50 4th 130.8 100 5th 64.7 50 5th 130.7 100 6th 62.7 50 6th 137.4 100 7th 56.9 50 7th 123 100 8th 61.3 50 8th 144.7 100

FALL MAP Math

Fall Math Median Percentile Comparisons Math Grade Fall 13 Fall 14 Fall 15 Fall 16 National comparison Median Kindergarten 61 50 69 69 50 1st 62 65 63 71 50 2nd 59 62 67 71 50 3rd 56 62 68 69 50 4th 57 54 64 69 50 5th 56 61 59 67 50 6th 59 54 58 63 50 7th 67 63 69 70 50 8th 61 68 78 73 50

Math Cohort Achievement Comparison (District Median Student Performance)

Math Growth Comparisons Math % OPP Fall 15 to Spr National Math % Fall 15 to National (Percent of 16 Average Meets Spr 16 Average Total Projected Target Points Earned) Kdg 63 50 Kdg 112.8 100 1st 69.8 50 1st 121.9 100 2nd 60.5 50 2nd 111.1 100 3rd 48.8 50 3rd 99.9 100 4th 56.4 50 4th 105.6 100 5th 51 50 5th 99.3 100 6th 69.7 50 6th 128.3 100 7th 64.1 50 7th 120.4 100 8th 59.3 50 8th 117.4 100

FALL MAP Language Usage

Language Usage Growth Comparisons Lang Usage % Fall 15 to Spr National Lang Fall 15 to National OPP (Percent of 16 Average Usage % Spr 16 Average Total Projected Meets Points Earned) Target 2nd 71.3 50 2nd 125.3 100 3rd 57.7 50 3rd 108.3 100 4th 63.7 50 4th 122.9 100 5th 58.4 50 5th 112.7 100 6th 66.8 50 6th 137.1 100 7th 66.7 50 7th 154.5 100 8th 69.1 50 8th 179.5 100

PARCC - ELA

PARCC - Math

Using NWEA MAP to Help Understand our PARCC Results MAP and PARCC Correlation

Spring Math 2015 MAP to PARCC Correlation Assessments Correlation MAP Percentile & PARCC Performance Level 0.83 MAP Percentile & PARCC Overall Scale Score 0.85 MAP RIT & PARCC Overall Scale Score 0.68

Spring 2016 Math MAP to PARCC Correlation Assessments Correlation MAP Percentile & PARCC Performance Level 0.80 MAP Percentile & PARCC Overall Scale Score 0.82 MAP RIT & PARCC Overall Scale Score 0.65

Math PARCC to PARCC Correlation Assessments Correlation 2015 & 2016 PARCC Performance Levels 0.76 2015 & 2016 PARCC Overall Scale Score 0.83

Math 2016 Performance Level Distribution PARCC Mean Map Standard Lower Med MAP Upper Level Percentile Deviation Quartile Percentile Quartile 1 27.88 19.51 11 24 42 2 43.33 18.40 30 43 57 3 62.99 15.15 53 64 74 4 83.87 10.80 78 86 92 5 95.95 3.36 94 97 98

Spring 2015 ELA MAP to PARCC Correlation Assessments Correlation MAP Percentile & PARCC Performance Level 0.76 MAP Percentile & PARCC Overall Scale Score 0.78 MAP RIT & PARCC Overall Scale Score 0.64

Spring 2016 ELA MAP to PARCC Correlation Assessments Correlation MAP Percentile & PARCC Performance Level 0.74 MAP Percentile & PARCC Overall Scale Score 0.77 MAP RIT & PARCC Overall Scale Score 0.67

ELA PARCC to PARCC Correlation Assessments Correlation 2015 & 2016 PARCC Performance Levels 0.77 2015 & 2016 PARCC Overall Scale Score 0.76

ELA 2016 Performance Level Distribution PARCC Mean Map Standard Lower Med MAP Upper Level Percentile Deviation Quartile Percentile Quartile 1 31 22 13 30 47 2 47 20 32 48 63 3 68 17 57 70 80 4 84 12 78 87 93 5 95 5 94 97 98

AIMSweb Our Norms: ● District Consistent Norms ○ Red - 15th Percentile National Norm - Tier 3 Consideration ○ Yellow - 50th Percentile National Norm - Tier 2 Consideration ○ (Many RTI Analysis - 5th Percentile Red - Tier 3 & 20th Percentile - Yellow - Tier 2) ● Graduation Opportunity ○ At least in 3rd Grade ○ 150 words per minute average on grade level text ○ Graduation Recommendation by teacher, principal, & reading specialist

2nd Grade AIMSweb R-CBM

3rd Grade AIMSweb R-CBM

4th Grade AIMSweb R-CBM

5th Grade AIMSweb R-CBM

6th Grade AIMSweb R-CBM

7th & 8th Grade AIMSweb R-CBM ● Only Administered to At-Risk/Students with IEPs on an Individual Need Basis.

Questions, Feedback & Dialogue