D 8.3 DELIVERABLE PROJECT INFORMATION Systemic Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis for Project Title: Buildings, Lifeline Networks and Infrastructures Safety Gain Acronym: SYNER-G Project N°: 244061 Call N°: FP7-ENV-2009-1 Project start: 01 November 2009 Duration: 36 months DELIVERABLE INFORMATION Deliverable Title: D8.3 - Project leaflet and project presentation (slides set) Date of issue: 31 January 2010 Work Package: WP8 – Guidelines, recommendations and dissemination Deliverable/Task Leader: Joint Research Centre REVISION: Final Project Coordinator: Prof. Kyriazis Pitilakis Institution: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki e-mail: kpitilak@civil.auth.gr fax: + 30 2310 995619 telephone: + 30 2310 995693
Systemic Seismic Vulnerability 14 partners from 11 countries and Risk Analysis Duration: Nov. 2009 - 2012 for Buildings, Lifeline Networks and Infrastructures Safety Gain The SYNER-G consortium Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (coordinator) Vienna Consulting Engineers Bureau de Recherches Geologiques et Minieres Commission of the EC - Joint Research Centre Norwegian Geotechnical Institute SYNER-G is supported by EC/DG Research (Grant agreement no: 244061) University of Pavia Project Coordinator University of Roma “La Sapienza” Prof. Kyriazis Pitilakis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Middle East Technical University kpitilak@civil.auth.gr Analysis and Monitoring of Environmental Risks, Project Officer University of Naples Federico II Dr Denis Peter Karlsruhe Institute of Technology European Commission, Research Directorate-General University of Patras denis.peter@ec.europa.eu Willis Group Holdings www.syner-g.eu Mid-America Earthquake Center, University of Illinois Research Center for Urban Safety and Security, Kobe University www.syner-g.eu
Main goals Project workflow SYNER-G To elaborate appropriate, in the European context, fragility Is a European Collaborative Research Project focusing on the relationships for the vulnerability analysis and loss estimation of all systemic seismic vulnerability and risk analysis of buildings, WP1. Coordination Project Management elements at risk lifelines and infrastructures. To develop social and economic vulnerability relationships for Is integrated across different disciplines with an internationally Executive Committee quantifying the impact of earthquakes recognized partnership from Europe, USA and Japan. The 14 Seismic Hazard participants in the consortium represent a variety of To develop a unified methodology, and tools, for systemic WP2. GENERAL METHODOLOGY Scenarios organizations, from universities and academic institutions to vulnerability assessment accounting for all components exposed to research foundations and SMEs. seismic hazard, considering interdependencies within a system unit WP3. PHYSICAL WP4. SOCIO ECONOMIC and between systems The objectives and the deliverables are focused to the needs VULNERABILITY & LOSSES VULNERABILITY & LOSSES Fragility functions of the administration and local authorities, which are To validate the methodology and the proposed fragility functions in for elements and systems for elements and systems responsible for the management of seismic risk, as well as selected sites (urban scale) and systems and to implement in an the needs of the construction and insurance industry. appropriate open source and unrestricted access software tool WP5. SYSTEMIC VULNERABILITY & LOSSES Buildings & Utility Transportation Critical aggregates systems infrastructures facilities Interdependencies between systems Reasons Objectives WP6. APPLICATION & VALIDATION Urban scale Utility-Transportation Critical facilities Past and ongoing research on the vulnerability assessment � Encompass all past and ongoing knowledge and know-how on this Thessaloniki city Pipeline network Hospital facility and seismic risk analysis of assets and urban systems are Motorway in Italy in Italy Vienna city topic at a European and International level focused on individual elements exposed at risk Electric network in Italy � Select the most advanced fragility functions and methods to assess There is an urgent need to develop fragility functions for all Harbor of Thessaloniki the physical and societal-economic vulnerability of all assets, elements at risk in the European context respecting the improving and further developing new ones where necessary, European distinctive features considering European distinctive features WP7. SOFTWARE WP8. GUIDELINES - Systemic vulnerability and the associated increased impact � TOOLS DISSEMINATION Propose the most appropriate means of selecting seismic scenarios have not been considered so far in a rigorous and unified way at system level for all kind of systems � Develop a unified methodology to assess vulnerability at a system There is a need in Europe to develop a unified tool to evaluate More than 80 deliverables level considering interdependencies between elements at risk seismic vulnerability and losses considering both physical and (physical and non-physical), belonging to different systems and Reports socio-economic aspects between different systems as a whole at city and regional scale Pilot studies Buildings & Building aggregates � Build an appropriate open-source software and tool to deal with Software tools Water & Wastewater � Electric power Elements systemic vulnerability � Validate the effectiveness of the methodology and the tools to at risk Gas & Oil � Roadway � Railway � Port Dissemination material specific and well selected case studies at city and regional scale Firefighting � Hospitals Guidelines and recommendations � Propose adequate guidelines and appropriate dissemination Technical workshops schemes for all products of the project at European and Loss Physical � Socio – Economic International level Final international workshop assessment Systemic
SYNER- -G G SYNER Systemic Seismic Vulnerability Systemic Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis and Risk Analysis for Buildings, Lifeline Networks and for Buildings, Lifeline Networks and Infrastructures Safety Gain Infrastructures Safety Gain D8.3: SYNER-G presentation 1
Project Coordinator Prof. Kyriazis Pitilakis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki kpitilak@civil.auth.gr Project Officer Dr Denis Peter European Commission, Research Directorate-General denis.peter@ec.europa.eu Duration: 36 months (starting date: Nov. 1 st , 2009) Project Webpage: www.syner-g.eu D8.3: SYNER-G presentation 2
SYNER-G Consortium Partners 1 ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI AUTH GREECE 2 VIENNA CONSULTING ENGINEERS VCE AUSTRIA 3 BUREAU DE RECHERCHES GEOLOGIQUES ET MINIERES BRGM FRANCE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES - DIRECTORATE 4 JRC BELGIUM GENERAL JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE 5 NORWEGIAN GEOTECHNICAL INSTITUTE NGI NORWAY 6 UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA UPAV ITALY 7 UNIVERSITY OF ROMA “LA SAPIENZA” UROMA ITALY 8 MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY METU TURKEY ANALYSIS AND MONITORING OF ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS, 9 AMRA ITALY UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II 10 KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KIT-U GERMANY 11 UNIVERSITY OF PATRAS UPAT GREECE 12 WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS WILLIS UK 13 MID-AMERICA EARTHQUAKE CENTER, UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS UILLINOIS USA RESEARCH CENTRE FOR URBAN SAFETY AND SECURITY, KOBE 14 UKOBE JAPAN UNIVERSITY D8.3: SYNER-G presentation 3
SYNER-G Project summary SYNER-G is research project which has the following main goals: (1) To elaborate appropriate, in the European context, fragility relationships for the vulnerability analysis and loss estimation of all elements at risk, for buildings, building aggregates, utility networks (water, waste water, energy, gas), transportation systems (road, railways, harbors) as well as complex medical care facilities (hospitals) and fire-fighting systems. (2) To develop social and economic vulnerability relationships for quantifying the impact of earthquakes. (3) To develop a unified methodology, and tools, for systemic vulnerability assessment accounting for all components (structural and socio-economic) exposed to seismic hazard, considering interdependencies within a system unit and between systems, in order to capture the increased loss impact due to the interdependencies and the interactions among systems and systems of systems. The methodology and the proposed fragility functions will be validated in selected sites (urban scale) and systems and it will implemented in an appropriate open source and unrestricted access software tool. Guidelines will be prepared and the results and outputs will be disseminated in Europe and world wide with appropriate dissemination schemes. SYNER-G is integrated across different disciplines with an internationally recognized partnership from Europe, USA and Japan. The objectives and the deliverables are focused to the needs of the administration and local authorities, which are responsible for the management of seismic risk, as well as the needs of the construction and insurance industry. The 14 participants in the SYNER-G consortium represent a variety of organizations, from universities and academic institutions to research foundations and SMEs. Together, they represent some of the best available expertise in different aspects of earthquake vulnerability assessment and loss estimation. The consortium takes advantage of the knowledge available with international partners from the US and Japan. The SYNER-G Consortium includes the main actors of the participating organizations. 4
Recommend
More recommend