cultural resources collaboration and innovation towards
play

Cultural Resources Collaboration and Innovation Towards Continuous - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Cultural Resources Collaboration and Innovation Towards Continuous Improvement: Traffic Signal Upgrades Memorandum of Understanding Eric Duff State Environmental Administrator At GDOT, we are at our best when faced with a challenge 2017


  1. Cultural Resources Collaboration and Innovation Towards Continuous Improvement: Traffic Signal Upgrades Memorandum of Understanding Eric Duff State Environmental Administrator

  2. At GDOT, we are at our best when faced with a challenge… 2017 I-85 Bridge Collapse 2018 Hurricane Michael

  3. Environmental Challenges are no different The Challenge– Statewide Signal Upgrades • Large Survey Areas • Huge Documents • Big Budgets • Extended Schedules 74 page History Report 220 page Archaeology Report

  4. Traffic Operations Signal Upgrades The Traffic Signal Upgrade Program • GDOT is responsible for over 6,000 on-system signals throughout the state • Signalized intersection upgrades from span wires to mast arms, where feasible

  5. Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act A Procedural Law • There are four separate required activities under the law that require documentation and coordination with agencies • Typical agency review time is 30 days for each round of review • Change to the Section 106 process requires coordination with SHPO and FHWA

  6. Collaboration Between GDOT Offices and Agencies GDOT Cultural Resources Managers… • Coordinated with Traffic Operations Management • Analyzed Signalization Projects from 2006 with Span Wire to Mast Arm Upgrades • Consulted with SHPO and FHWA

  7. The Innovation: A Memorandum of Understanding with SHPO and FHWA How is this innovative? • Shorter timelines • Less potential for Consistent on-time Section 4(f) project delivery! • Fewer disagreements with agencies • More time spent on the important issues

  8. The Results – Historic Resources Example: Upgrades to 20 Signal Locations Number of Weeks for Survey and Reporting 25 20 20 15 10 5 1 0 Then Now #of Weeks

  9. The Results – Historic Resources Example: Upgrades to 20 Signal Locations Survey and Reporting Costs Survey and Assessment of Effect Costs WITH MOU $2,500 WITH MOU $2,500 WITHOUT MOU $150,000 WITHOUT MOU $225,000 $0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 $140,000 $160,000 $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 Without MOU With MOU Without MOU With MOU Cost Savings: $222,500!

  10. The Results – Archaeological Resources Example: Upgrades to 20 Signal Locations #of Sites 15 13 10 5 2 0 Then Now #of Sites # of Shovel Tests 1200 1040 1000 720 800 600 400 200 0 Then Now #of Shovel Tests

  11. The Results – Archaeological Resources Example: Upgrades to 20 Signal Locations Survey and Reporting Costs WITH MOU $42,000 WITHOUT MOU $72,000 $0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000 $70,000 $80,000 Without MOU With MOU Cost Savings: $30,000!

  12. Continuous Improvement The MOU significantly cuts down on project costs and delivers projects faster Potential Total Cost Savings for GDOT per Project: $252,500

  13. “Obligation to be Great” Office of Office of Traffic Environmental Operations Services

Recommend


More recommend