Creating a Dynamic Grammar of Ancient Greek An on-going research project at the Catholic University of Leuven (Prof. dr. Toon Van Hal, Yannick Anné)
Linguistic background Functional Linguistics and the limitations of printed grammars
Ancient Greek teaching in Flanders • Taal- en letterkunde = “Linguistics and Literature” • Ancient Greek and Latin = two modules, on the same level as modern languages • ≠ earlier system (cf. Germany’s Altphilologie , Anglo-Saxon Classics etc.)
Model of choice: Functional Linguistics • Simon Dik, The Theory of Functional Grammar (Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter 1997). • Functional levels: Pragmatic functions 1. Syntactic functions 2. Semantic functions 3.
Limitations of conventional grammars (1) Grammar A Grammar C Grammar B Dative [MO] Satellites [SY] Cause [SE] 1. 1. Satellites [SY] 1. Cause [SE] Dative [MO] Cause [SE] Dative [MO] Satellites [SY] 1. 1. 1. Means 2. διά + acc. διά + acc. 2. 2. … … 3. 3. … 3. Most classical languages (receptive, not active)
Limitations of conventional grammars (2) • Denial of complexity • Lack of dynamicity • Bound to a specific level of knowledge
Limitations of conventional grammars (3) • Solution: DYNAMIC STRUCTURE based upon TAGS Form tags (morphology) 1. Content tags (semantics, pragmatics) 2. Hierarchy tags (syntax, pragmatics) 3. Level tags (study level) 4. • Navigation through faceted search • Each tag gets an own page (definition, background)
Macro-structure ἵνα + subjunctive: Goal as a satellite satellite ἵνα subjunctive Goal
Micro-structure The structure of a prototypical paragraph
Micro-structure: a typical paragraph
Micro-structure: a typical paragraph Succinct example
Micro-structure: a typical paragraph Level tag
Micro-structure: a typical paragraph Grammatical tags
Micro-structure: a typical paragraph Grammatical rule
Micro-structure: a typical paragraph Supplementary information
Micro-structure: a typical paragraph Supplementary information
Micro-structure: a typical paragraph Example sentences
Micro-structure: metadata (1: rules) • Unique identifier • Bibliography – main sources: o Crespo, E. etc. Sintaxis del griego clásico (2003) o Rijksbaron, A. The syntax and semantics of the verb in Classical Greek (2006³) o “Traditional” grammars: Smyth, Goodwin… o Etc.
Micro-structure: metadata (2: examples) • Unique identifiers for: Linking to more than one grammatical rule 1. Usage as exercises (with link to grammatical rule) 2. • Automatic link to Perseus database http://data.perseus.org/citations/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg005.perseus-grc1:383a = Plat. Crat. 383a = Plato, Kratylos 383a • Possibility for extra links to metadata (e.g. Perseus Catalog ; Trismegistos ; Wikidata )
Macro-structure Dynamicity from database to website
Technological background Filemaker Pro database (also Importer tool Drupal interface including morphology)
Technological background: Filemaker • Relational database: o Allows links between rules, tags, and examples o Avoids typing mistakes o Allows for exports to Drupal & Word
Technological background: importer (1) Step 1: separate importers Step 2: matching Filemaker for rules, tags, examples, to Drupal fields and bibliography
Technological background: importer (2) Step 3: importing into the Step 4: importing the .csv Drupal environment file (converted from .fp7)
Technological background: Drupal • Drupal taxonomies = our tags • Custom-made faceted search tool (Hans Coppens) • Adaptive user interface, optimized for touchscreens
Dynamicity in practice Demonstration of faceted search
Faceted search (step 1) 4 types of filters: 1. Form 2. Content 3. Hierarchy 4. Level
Faceted search (step 2) Selection of the first tag.
Faceted search (step 3) Selection of a second, third, fourth etc. tag.
Implementation in classroom learning
Implementation: blended learning • Blended learning : o Classroom learning o Self-study at home • 3 aspects: READING grammar (< form & hierarchy tags) 1. LEARNING grammar (< level tags) 2. REFERENCE grammar (< content & hierarchy tags) 3.
Implementation: exercises (1) • Exercises and assessment: o Not in Drupal, but linked to Toledo/Blackboard platform o Edumatic software (by Televic Education ) o Types: drop-down, fill in the gap…
Implementation: exercises (2)
Implementation: exercises (3)
Future prospects
Future prospects • 2-year project, ending in October 2015 • Availability for information exchange ( Creative Commons ) • Adaptations (e.g. a version specifically for history students) are possible thanks to the dynamic structure
Thank you for your attention.
Recommend
More recommend