Craver Road Study UNC Charlotte February 24, 2010
Project Description • Student Union opened August, 2009 • Vehicle/Pedestrian conflicts in front of Student Union due to excessive pedestrian volumes – Safety issues for pedestrians – Traffic flow issues for vehicles along Craver Road
Student Union Crossing
Student Union Crossing
Student Union Crossing
Student Union Crossing
Project Description • Two Analysis Scenarios – Short term solution: installation of traffic/pedestrian signal at Student Union crossing • How will a signal work at this crossing? For vehicles? For pedestrians? – Long term solution: closure of Craver Road to non-essential through traffic • How can closure be implemented? What effects will closure of Craver Road have on the rest of campus?
Study Area 5 STUDENT UNION 3 4 2 N 1
Data Collection • Three Peak Periods – 7:00 AM – 9:00 AM – 10:00 AM – 1:00 PM – 4:00 PM – 6:00 PM • Traffic Counts at 5 study intersections • Pedestrian Counts at Student Union • Video Data • Wednesday November 18 th , 2009
Traffic Analysis Procedure • Synchro 7 • SimTraffic • Sidra Intersection 3.2 • Based on HCM Methodology Highway Capacity Manual - Levels of Service and Delay UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION AVERAGE AVERAGE LEVEL OF CONTROL DELAY LEVEL OF CONTROL DELAY SERVICE PER VEHICLE SERVICE PER VEHICLE (SECONDS) (SECONDS) A 0-10 A 0-10 B 10-15 B 10-20 C 15-25 C 20-35 D 25-35 D 35-55 E 35-50 E 55-80 F >50 F >80
Existing Traffic Volumes
Volume Adjustments – Craver Road Closure • Service Vehicles [Counted] • Drop-off Traffic [30% of Remaining Trips] • Source/Sink Traffic [10% - West End of Craver Rd., 30% East End] • Diverted Trips – Video data – pseudo origin-destination study to attempt to determine travel patterns
Existing Traffic Volumes With Closure
Future Campus Growth • Future analysis year of 2015 • In referring to Master Plan and anticipated campus growth, a compound annual growth rate of 3% was used
Future Traffic Volumes With Closure
A WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE Capacity Analysis P P AM Mid-Day PM LANE R LOCATION O CONFIG. A • Approach Overall Approach Overall Approach Overall C Existing (2009) H Conditions C 1 C 1 D 1 1 LT-RT Cameron EB A 2 A 2 A 2 Boulevard and NB 1 LT-TH N/A N/A N/A • Synchro Capacity Phillips Road SB 1 TH-RT -- -- -- Analysis Results Cameron 1 LT-RT A A B EB Boulevard and • NB 1 LT-TH A A A A B A Student Union Signal Phillips Road SB 1 TH-RT A A A (Signalized) analysis completed C 1 C 1 D 1 1 LT-RT using Sidra Cameron WB Boulevard and NB 1 TH-RT -- N/A -- N/A -- N/A Craver Road SB A 2 A 2 A 2 Intersection 3.2 1 LT-TH Craver Road and 1 TH A A A EB Student Union 1 TH A A A A A A WB Crossing NB/SB [PEDS] A A A (Signalized)* B 1 B 1 B 1 1 LT-RT Mary Alexander EB A 2 A 2 A 2 1 LT-TH N/A N/A N/A Road and Craver NB Road SB 1 TH-RT -- -- -- 1 LT-TH-RT B B D EB Mary Alexander 1 LT-TH-RT B C C WB B C C Road and Cameron NB 1 LT-TH-RT A B C Boulevard SB 1 LT-TH-RT C C C
Capacity Analysis A WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE P P • AM Mid-Day PM R LANE Existing (2009) LOCATION O CONFIG. Conditions With A C Approach Overall Approach Overall Approach Overall Craver Road Closure H • Synchro Capacity Cameron C 1 C 1 E 1 EB 1 LT-RT Boulevard A 2 N/A A 2 N/A A 2 N/A Analysis Results NB 1 LT-TH and Phillips SB 1 TH-RT -- -- -- Road Cameron C 1 B 1 C 1 WB 1 LT-RT Boulevard N/A N/A N/A NB 1 TH-RT -- -- -- and Craver A 2 A 2 A 2 SB 1 LT-TH Road Mary EB 1 LT-RT B 1 B 1 B 1 Alexander NB 1 LT-TH A 2 N/A A 2 N/A A 2 N/A Road and SB 1 TH-RT -- -- -- Craver Road Mary EB 1 LT-TH-RT B C F Alexander WB 1 LT-TH-RT B C C Road and C C E NB 1 LT-TH-RT B C C Cameron SB 1 LT-TH-RT C D C Boulevard
A Capacity Analysis WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE P P LANE AM Mid-Day PM R LOCATION O CONFIG. A • Existing (2009) C Approach Overall Approach Overall Approach Overall H Conditions With Cameron EB 1 LT-TH-RT A B B Craver Road Closure Boulevard and WB 1 LT-TH-RT B B B Phillips Road / A B B 1 LT , 1 TH-RT • NB A A B Synchro Capacity Craver Road 1 LT , 1 TH-RT SB A B B (Signalized) Analysis Results B 1 B 1 B 1 Mary Alexander EB 1 LT-RT • Roundbout analysis A 2 A 2 A 2 Road and Craver NB 1 LT-TH N/A N/A N/A Road SB 1 TH-RT -- -- -- completed using Sidra Mary Alexander Intersection 3.2 EB 1 LT-TH-RT B E F Road and WB 1 LT-TH-RT B F E Cameron D F F NB 1 LT-TH-RT B D D Boulevard SB 1 LT-TH-RT E F E (Unsignalized) Mary Alexander EB 1 LT , 1 TH-RT A A B Road and WB 1 LT-TH-RT B B A Cameron A B B NB 1 LT-TH-RT A B C Boulevard SB 1 LT-TH, 1 RT A A A (Signalized) Mary Alexander EB 1 LT-TH-RT A B B Road and WB 1 LT-TH-RT A B B Cameron B B B NB 1 LT-TH-RT B B B Boulevard SB 1 LT-TH-RT B B A (Roundabout)*
Recommendations • Cameron Boulevard and Phillips Road / Craver Road – Signal at existing Phillips Road intersection expected to work well and increase safety – Future signal at proposed re-alignment of Phillips Road with Craver Road expected to work well • Northbound and southbound left turn lanes recommended on Cameron Boulevard
Recommendations • Craver Road Improvements – Signalization of Student Union Crossing expected to work well • Low cycle length • Pedestrians as main line – Craver Road Closure concept drawing • Provides closure with access for University vehicles • Would fit within current infrastructure • Pedestrian friendly • Construction cost estimate - $780,000
Craver Road – Roundabout Concept
Craver Road – Roundabout Concept
Craver Road – Roundabout 2
Craver Road – Roundabout Concept
Craver Road – Roundabout 2
Recommendations • Cameron Boulevard and Mary Alexander Road – Long delays/queues as expected with Craver Road Closure as unsignalized intersection – Roundabout and Signalization both adequate solutions – Roundabout concept drawing • Provides adequate capacity • Would fit within current infrastructure • Attractive entrance to campus • Construction cost estimate - $340,000
Craver Road – Roundabout Concept
Questions/Discussion?
Recommend
More recommend