Cosmology with Mimetic Matter Alexander Vikman 18.07.14 Monday, July 21, 14
Mimetic Matter Chamseddine, Mukhanov (2013) Monday, July 21, 14
Mimetic Matter Chamseddine, Mukhanov (2013) One can encode the conformal / scalar part of the physical metric in a scalar field : φ g µ ν g αβ ∂ α φ ∂ β φ g µ ν (˜ g, φ ) = ˜ g µ ν ˜ Monday, July 21, 14
Mimetic Matter Chamseddine, Mukhanov (2013) One can encode the conformal / scalar part of the physical metric in a scalar field : φ g µ ν g αβ ∂ α φ ∂ β φ g µ ν (˜ g, φ ) = ˜ g µ ν ˜ auxiliary metric Monday, July 21, 14
Mimetic Matter Chamseddine, Mukhanov (2013) One can encode the conformal / scalar part of the physical metric in a scalar field : φ g µ ν g αβ ∂ α φ ∂ β φ g µ ν (˜ g, φ ) = ˜ g µ ν ˜ auxiliary metric √− g ✓ ◆� − 1 Z d 4 x S [˜ g µ ν , φ , Φ m ] = 2 R ( g ) + L ( g, Φ m ) g µ ν = g µ ν (˜ g, φ ) Monday, July 21, 14
Mimetic Matter Chamseddine, Mukhanov (2013) One can encode the conformal / scalar part of the physical metric in a scalar field : φ g µ ν g αβ ∂ α φ ∂ β φ g µ ν (˜ g, φ ) = ˜ g µ ν ˜ auxiliary metric √− g ✓ ◆� − 1 Z d 4 x S [˜ g µ ν , φ , Φ m ] = 2 R ( g ) + L ( g, Φ m ) g µ ν = g µ ν (˜ g, φ ) The theory becomes invariant with respect to Weyl transformations: g µ ν → Ω 2 ( x ) ˜ ˜ g µ ν Monday, July 21, 14
Mimetic Matter Chamseddine, Mukhanov (2013) One can encode the conformal / scalar part of the physical metric in a scalar field : φ g µ ν g αβ ∂ α φ ∂ β φ g µ ν (˜ g, φ ) = ˜ g µ ν ˜ auxiliary metric √− g ✓ ◆� − 1 Z d 4 x S [˜ g µ ν , φ , Φ m ] = 2 R ( g ) + L ( g, Φ m ) g µ ν = g µ ν (˜ g, φ ) The theory becomes The scalar field obeys a invariant with respect to constraint (Hamilton-Jacobi Weyl transformations: equation): g µ ν → Ω 2 ( x ) ˜ g µ ν ∂ µ φ ∂ ν φ = 1 ˜ g µ ν Monday, July 21, 14
√− g ✓ ◆� − 1 Z d 4 x S [˜ g µ ν , φ , Φ m ] = 2 R ( g ) + L ( g, Φ m ) g µ ν = g µ ν (˜ g, φ ) g αβ ∂ α φ ∂ β φ with g µ ν (˜ g, φ ) = ˜ g µ ν ˜ Monday, July 21, 14
√− g ✓ ◆� − 1 Z d 4 x S [˜ g µ ν , φ , Φ m ] = 2 R ( g ) + L ( g, Φ m ) g µ ν = g µ ν (˜ g, φ ) g αβ ∂ α φ ∂ β φ with g µ ν (˜ g, φ ) = ˜ g µ ν ˜ is not in the Horndeski construction, see talks of Deffayet, Sivanesan, Vernizzi, Piazza Monday, July 21, 14
√− g ✓ ◆� − 1 Z d 4 x S [˜ g µ ν , φ , Φ m ] = 2 R ( g ) + L ( g, Φ m ) g µ ν = g µ ν (˜ g, φ ) g αβ ∂ α φ ∂ β φ with g µ ν (˜ g, φ ) = ˜ g µ ν ˜ is not in the Horndeski construction, see talks of Deffayet, Sivanesan, Vernizzi, Piazza But it is still a system with one degree of freedom! Monday, July 21, 14
Mimetic Dark Matter Chamseddine, Mukhanov; Golovnev; Barvinsky (2013) Lim, Sawicki, Vikman; (2010) Monday, July 21, 14
Mimetic Dark Matter Chamseddine, Mukhanov; Golovnev; Barvinsky (2013) Lim, Sawicki, Vikman; (2010) g µ ν = ˜ Weyl-invariance allows one to fix g µ ν Monday, July 21, 14
Mimetic Dark Matter Chamseddine, Mukhanov; Golovnev; Barvinsky (2013) Lim, Sawicki, Vikman; (2010) g µ ν = ˜ Weyl-invariance allows one to fix g µ ν one implements constraint through λ ( g µ ν ∂ µ φ∂ ν φ − 1) ✓ ◆ Z − 1 d 4 x √− g S [ g µ ν , φ , λ , Φ m ] = 2 R ( g ) + L ( g, Φ m ) + λ ( g µ ν ∂ µ φ∂ ν φ − 1) Monday, July 21, 14
Mimetic Dark Matter Chamseddine, Mukhanov; Golovnev; Barvinsky (2013) Lim, Sawicki, Vikman; (2010) g µ ν = ˜ Weyl-invariance allows one to fix g µ ν one implements constraint through λ ( g µ ν ∂ µ φ∂ ν φ − 1) ✓ ◆ Z − 1 d 4 x √− g S [ g µ ν , φ , λ , Φ m ] = 2 R ( g ) + L ( g, Φ m ) + λ ( g µ ν ∂ µ φ∂ ν φ − 1) The system is equivalent to standard GR + irrotational dust, moving along timelike geodesics with the velocity and energy density ρ = λ u µ = ∂ µ φ Monday, July 21, 14
Mimetic Dark Matter Chamseddine, Mukhanov; Golovnev; Barvinsky (2013) Lim, Sawicki, Vikman; (2010) g µ ν = ˜ Weyl-invariance allows one to fix g µ ν one implements constraint through λ ( g µ ν ∂ µ φ∂ ν φ − 1) ✓ ◆ Z − 1 d 4 x √− g S [ g µ ν , φ , λ , Φ m ] = 2 R ( g ) + L ( g, Φ m ) + λ ( g µ ν ∂ µ φ∂ ν φ − 1) The system is equivalent to standard GR + irrotational dust, moving along timelike geodesics with the velocity and energy density ρ = λ u µ = ∂ µ φ “Cold Dark Matter” ? Monday, July 21, 14
Mimicking any cosmological evolution, But always with zero sound speed Lim, Sawicki, Vikman; (2010) Chamseddine, Mukhanov, Vikman (2014) Monday, July 21, 14
Mimicking any cosmological evolution, But always with zero sound speed Lim, Sawicki, Vikman; (2010) Chamseddine, Mukhanov, Vikman (2014) Just add a potential ! V ( φ ) Monday, July 21, 14
Mimicking any cosmological evolution, But always with zero sound speed Lim, Sawicki, Vikman; (2010) Chamseddine, Mukhanov, Vikman (2014) Just add a potential ! V ( φ ) g µ ν ∂ µ φ ∂ ν φ = 1 φ Convenient to take as time Monday, July 21, 14
Mimicking any cosmological evolution, But always with zero sound speed Lim, Sawicki, Vikman; (2010) Chamseddine, Mukhanov, Vikman (2014) Just add a potential ! V ( φ ) g µ ν ∂ µ φ ∂ ν φ = 1 φ Convenient to take as time Adding a potential = adding a function of time in the equation H + 3 H 2 = V ( t ) 2 ˙ Monday, July 21, 14
Mimicking any cosmological evolution, But always with zero sound speed Lim, Sawicki, Vikman; (2010) Chamseddine, Mukhanov, Vikman (2014) Just add a potential ! V ( φ ) g µ ν ∂ µ φ ∂ ν φ = 1 φ Convenient to take as time Adding a potential = adding a function of time in the equation H + 3 H 2 = V ( t ) 2 ˙ Enough freedom to obtain any cosmological evolution! Monday, July 21, 14
Mimicking any cosmological evolution, But always with zero sound speed Lim, Sawicki, Vikman; (2010) Chamseddine, Mukhanov, Vikman (2014) Just add a potential ! V ( φ ) g µ ν ∂ µ φ ∂ ν φ = 1 φ Convenient to take as time Adding a potential = adding a function of time in the equation H + 3 H 2 = V ( t ) 2 ˙ Enough freedom to obtain any cosmological evolution! m 4 φ 2 V ( φ ) = 1 In particular gives the same cosmological e φ + 1 3 1 inflation as potential in the standard case 2 m 2 φ 2 Monday, July 21, 14
Perturbations I Lim, Sawicki, Vikman; (2010) Chamseddine, Mukhanov, Vikman (2014) Even with potential, the field still moves along the timelike geodesics Monday, July 21, 14
Perturbations I Lim, Sawicki, Vikman; (2010) Chamseddine, Mukhanov, Vikman (2014) Even with potential, the field still moves along the timelike geodesics c S = 0 Monday, July 21, 14
Perturbations I Lim, Sawicki, Vikman; (2010) Chamseddine, Mukhanov, Vikman (2014) Even with potential, the field still moves along the timelike geodesics c S = 0 ✓ ◆ Z 1 − H + H Φ = C 1 ( x ) a C 2 ( x ) adt a Here on all scales but in the usual cosmology it is an approximation for superhorizon scales Monday, July 21, 14
How to give a sound speed to Mimetic Matter? Chamseddine, Mukhanov, Vikman (2014) Monday, July 21, 14
How to give a sound speed to Mimetic Matter? Chamseddine, Mukhanov, Vikman (2014) 1 2 γ ( ⇤ φ ) 2 Just add higher derivatives ! Monday, July 21, 14
How to give a sound speed to Mimetic Matter? Chamseddine, Mukhanov, Vikman (2014) 1 2 γ ( ⇤ φ ) 2 Just add higher derivatives ! γ The sound speed is c 2 s = 2 − 3 γ Monday, July 21, 14
How to give a sound speed to Mimetic Matter? Chamseddine, Mukhanov, Vikman (2014) 1 2 γ ( ⇤ φ ) 2 Just add higher derivatives ! γ The sound speed is c 2 s = 2 − 3 γ Back to waves, oscillators and normal quantum fluctuations! Monday, July 21, 14
The scalar field still obeys a constraint (Hamilton-Jacobi g µ ν ∂ µ φ ∂ ν φ = 1 equation) Monday, July 21, 14
The scalar field still obeys a constraint (Hamilton-Jacobi g µ ν ∂ µ φ ∂ ν φ = 1 equation) Higher time derivatives can be eliminated just by the differentiation of this equation Monday, July 21, 14
The scalar field still obeys a constraint (Hamilton-Jacobi g µ ν ∂ µ φ ∂ ν φ = 1 equation) Higher time derivatives can be eliminated just by the differentiation of this equation There are only minor changes (rescaling) in the background evolution equations e.g. 2 H + 3 H 2 = 2 ˙ 2 − 3 γ V ( t ) Monday, July 21, 14
Perturbations HD Chamseddine, Mukhanov, Vikman (2014) Monday, July 21, 14
Perturbations HD Chamseddine, Mukhanov, Vikman (2014) φ − c 2 δ ¨ φ + H δ ˙ a 2 ∆ δφ + ˙ s H δφ = 0 γ c 2 with s = 2 − 3 γ Monday, July 21, 14
Perturbations HD Chamseddine, Mukhanov, Vikman (2014) φ − c 2 δ ¨ φ + H δ ˙ a 2 ∆ δφ + ˙ s H δφ = 0 γ c 2 with s = 2 − 3 γ Φ = δ ˙ φ Monday, July 21, 14
Quantization Monday, July 21, 14
Recommend
More recommend