continuity training in dermatology achieving a balance
play

Continuity Training in Dermatology: Achieving a Balance Between - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Continuity Training in Dermatology: Achieving a Balance Between Exposure and Experience Tom Cropley, MD Department of Dermatology University of Virginia I have no relevant industry relationships or other conflicts of interest to disclose


  1. Continuity Training in Dermatology: Achieving a Balance Between Exposure and Experience Tom Cropley, MD Department of Dermatology University of Virginia

  2. I have no relevant industry relationships or other conflicts of interest to disclose

  3. Continuity training: definition • A recurring outpatient clinic experience which gives the resident the opportunity to provide care for a population of patients in a longitudinal fashion. • ACGME wants this to occur at least once weekly for all 3 years, ideally in the same location.

  4. The paradox • Some residency training experiences occur most naturally in a continuity clinic setting: – Learning the natural rhythms of skin diseases (e.g., atopic dermatitis) – Seeing firsthand the results of one’s treatment efforts – Developing relationships with patients and practicing the art of doctoring

  5. The paradox • BUT this requires autonom y for residents as well as supervision , a difficult balance to achieve and maintain • AND continuity clinics have drawbacks – overrepresentation of “bread and butter” cases – financial downside for department – Attendings may be less involved than in their own clinics

  6. Comparing two programs • 9 residents • 6 residents • One primary • One primary practice site practice site • Residents rotate to • Residents rotate weekly peds derm on Mohs and and VA clinics dermpath as 1- month blocks

  7. Comparing two programs • Each resident’s • Each resident’s basic schedule schedule changes template the same from month to for 3 years (i.e., month same attending on • Continuity clinic same half day for 3 attending changes years) monthly

  8. Comparing two programs • Every general • 1-2 continuity derm clinic is a clinics per week continuity clinic • Not all encounters • Every patient seen directly supervised by resident and by attending attending

  9. Comparing two programs • Patient • Patient appointments are appointments are scheduled under scheduled under attending’s name resident’s name • Patients tend to • Patients identify identify attending resident as their as their doctor doctor

  10. Comparing two programs • Resident • Resident vacations, away vacations, away rotations don’t rotations are a mess up schedule headache (attending sees (requires that patients) another resident cover)

  11. Comparing two programs • Resident may not • Residents do have opportunity procedures on to do procedures their own patients on his/ her own patients

  12. Comparing two programs • Residents become • Residents become experienced, experienced, caring, effective caring, effective dermatologists dermatologists • Patients receive • Patients receive top-notch care top-notch care

  13. Advantages • 100% continuity • High degree of (in theory) autonomy • 100% supervision • Opportunities for (in theory) procedures • Diverse case mix • Residents love it • Attendings sleep well at night

  14. Disadvantages • Fewer procedure • More “bread and opportunities butter” case mix than UMass • Residents may feel oversupervised • Attendings worry (less autonomy) that less supervision may lead to quality issues

  15. Conclusions and opinions 1. Both models are effective, and continuity clinics provide unique experiences 2. Both programs have a single primary practice site---multisite programs have other challenges to continuity training 3. A little autonomy goes a long way

  16. Conclusions and opinions 4. The attending’s involvement may at times be a barrier to resident – patient relationship 5. In general, supervision trumps autonomy

Recommend


More recommend