const struct ction c contract ct a auditing
play

Const struct ction C Contract ct A Auditing Presenters Curt P - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Const struct ction C Contract ct A Auditing Presenters Curt P Plyl yler, C CFA, C CCA Princi cipal al Fort t Hill A l Assoc ociate tes, L LLC Jim M McCoy, PE, E, C CCA Senior ior Constr tructio ion A Auditor itor Fort


  1. Const struct ction C Contract ct A Auditing Presenters Curt P Plyl yler, C CFA, C CCA Princi cipal al Fort t Hill A l Assoc ociate tes, L LLC Jim M McCoy, PE, E, C CCA Senior ior Constr tructio ion A Auditor itor Fort t Hill A l Assoc ociate tes, L LLC

  2. Introduc uction n – Fort H Hill Asso ssoci ciates, s, L LLC Consult ltancy f focused s sole lely on C Constr tructio tion Contr tract A t Auditi iting • Founded i ded in 2 2006 • Audit p it philos ilosophy o of i identi tifyin ing p pote otentia tial i l issues a and e esta tablis lishin ing financia ial l contr trols ls • prior ior to c contr tract e t executio tion Signif ific icant f t focus o on H Higher Educatio tion p proj ojects ts • Virginia Tech West Virginia University • Radford University Duke University • James Madison University Wake Forest University • Old Dominion University Clemson University • University of Richmond University of Wyoming • Emory University Vanderbilt University • Virgin inia ia T Tech C Contr tract t #UCP- TP TP-004 004-13 a 13 availabl ble t e to VASCUPP m member bers •

  3. Introduc uction n – Pr Present enters Curt P Plyl yler • Founding member of firm in 2006 • Certified Construction Auditor & a CFA charterholder • Engagement Manager for the University of Richmond, Duke University, Wake • Forest University and the University of Maryland Ji Jim M McC cCoy • Joined firm in 2016 after 30 years in Facilities Management at Virginia Tech • Certified Construction Auditor & a licensed Professional Engineer • Engagement Manager for Virginia Tech, James Madison University, Radford • University, Old Dominion University and West Virginia University

  4. Introduc uction n – Sessi ession Object ective #1 Unde nderstand nd t the he be benefit of a compr mprehens nsive Financi cial al audit o it of a Cons nstruc uction Ma Mana nager’s a allowabl ble pr project cha harges t to compleme ment nt e existing ng Proce cedural al audits its o of in inte ternal p l project t ma mana nagement nt pr processes Procedural audits are often used to measure compliance with internal • processes, but a Financial audit ensures the Institution has been billed for project construction costs in accordance with contract requirements Construction contract auditing often identifies overpayments and additional • opportunities for cost avoidance on most large construction projects The Institution’s internal staff may not have the resources and/or skill sets • to effectively audit the Construction Manager’s charges at a transactional level

  5. Introduc uction n – Sessi ession Object ective #2 Unde nderstand nd ho how spe pecific cont ntract l langu nguage de determi mines wha hat a and nd ho how t the he Cons nstruction Ma Mana nager i is compe mpensated d by th the I Institu tituti tion Larger, more complex projects are increasingly being constructed using • contracts requiring the Institution to reimburse a Construction Manager’s direct costs versus the payment of a fixed, lump sum amount The Construction Manager’s direct costs must be thoroughly evaluated • to determine which charges are allowable/not allowable relative to the contract terms The Department of General Services (DGS) construction contract • template utilized by most state agencies has unique language with respect to how costs are categorized and compensated

  6. Introduc uction n – Sessi ession Object ective #3 Unde nderstand nd t the he v value o of a Pr Pre-Const struct ction C Contract act Review to to esta tablis ish effectiv ive f fin inancia ial contr trols ls Mitigates potential problems & issues before they occur • Reconcile any differing contract interpretations and clarify the intent • of ‘actual cost incurred’ Establish expectations for required backup documentation to support • payments to the Construction Manager Enables a more efficient audit process during the project as the focus is • on compliance with previously established financial controls Potential cost savings are realized over the entire project, eliminating • the need for a “settlement” at project closeout

  7. Pr Present entation n Out utline ne 1) 1) Overview o of Cost Pl Plus us C Cons nstruc uction C Cont ntracts 2) Au 2) Auditin iting C Cost Plu lus Constr tructi tion C Contr tracts ts 3) P ) Pre-Const struct ction C Contract act R Reviews

  8. Const struct ction C Contract cting M Met ethodology A Construction Contract Audit effectively measures the Construction • Manager’s compliance with the billing requirements set forth in the Contract As such, a basic understanding of the construction contract type is • essential for assessing Institutional risk, identifying project financial controls and developing an effective audit plan The value of a Construction Contract Audit varies significantly depending • upon the contract type “Cost Plus” Construction Contracts (i.e., CM at Risk, GMP, etc.) between • the Institution and a “Construction Manager” offer a much greater opportunity to identify costs savings in an audit than conventional lump sum/hard bid contracts

  9. Cost st Plus s Const struct ction Contract cts As opposed to simply paying a fixed contract amount, the • Institution reimburses the Construction Manager for their direct/actual construction Cost(s), Plus the Institution pays the Construction Manager any fixed fees as defined by the Contract The original Contract amount is not fixed, but typically capped at • some level (Guaranteed Maximum Price – GMP, GMAX) Final/Actual contract amount is of often less than GMP amount • Open-Book contract provision allows the Institution to have full • access to the Construction Manager’s cost records

  10. DGS S Const stru ruct ction on M Manager a r at Risk Const stru ruct ction on C Contract ct COMPENSATION TO BE PAID TO THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: The Owner agrees to pay and the Construction Manager agrees to accept as just and adequate compensation for the performance of the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents the sum of The Cost of the Construction Work – As defined in the General Conditions of the Construction Manager “At Risk” Construction Contract (CO-7CM) The General Conditions Fee in the amount of: _____________________________________________dollars ($__________________). The Insurance and Taxes Fee in the amount of percent ( %) of the Cost of the Construction Work. The Construction Manager’s Fee in the amount of: _____________________________________________dollars ($__________________). In no case shall the total compensation to the Construction Manager exceed the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) of: _____________________________________________dollars ($__________________).

  11. Cost st Plus s Const struct ction C Contract ct C Componen ents 1) 1) Construction Manager’s Fee (2%-3%) %) 2) 2) General Con ondition ons Fee (4%-6%) %)* 3) 3) Insurance and Taxes Fee (2%-3%) %)* 4) 4) Cost of the Construction Work a. Construction Manager Labor, Equipment and Materials (0%-10%) b. Subcontracts (75%-85%) c. Allowances and Construction Contingency (2%-4%) * For Private Institutions using an AIA construction contract, costs associated with General Conditions and Bonds/Insurances are categorized as Cost of the Work and compensated as direct costs.

  12. Cost st Plus s Const struct ction C Contract ct C Componen ents Construction Manager's Fee General Conditions General Requirements Subcontracts and Self-Performed Work Bonds, Insurances, Taxes, Fees, etc. Allowances Construction Contingency

  13. Auditing C Cost st Plus s Const struction C Contract cts Cons nstruction Ma n Mana nager’s F Fee Construction Manager’s Overhead and Profit • Compensated by the Institution as a fixed amount* (DGS construction • contract) or percentage of the Cost of the Work (AIA construction contract) *Costs included within the Construction Manager’s Fee must be clearly defined by the Institution to avoid any duplication of similar costs billed as Cost of the Construction Work (See Sample Construction Cost Matrix Handout)

  14. Auditing C Cost st Plus s Const struction C Contract cts General l Condit itio ions F Fee Fee includes the Construction Manager’s project specific costs associated with: • Project Management Labor (Project Manager, Project Engineer(s), • Superintendent(s), etc.) Project Management Operating Costs (Trailer Rental, Office Furnishings & • Supplies, Vehicles, Information Technology, Telecommunication, etc.) Jobsite Safety and Security • Jobsite Signage • Other • Compensated by the Institution as a fixed amount* (DGS construction contract) or a • direct cost (AIA construction contract) *Costs included within the General Conditions Fee must be clearly defined by the Institution to avoid any duplication of similar costs billed as Cost of the Construction Work (See Sample Construction Cost Matrix Handout)

Recommend


More recommend