consideration
play

Consideration Liuwang Kang, Haiying Shen, and Ankur Sarker - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Velocity Optimization of Pure Electric Vehicles with Traffic Dynamics Consideration Liuwang Kang, Haiying Shen, and Ankur Sarker Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia Outline Introduction System Design Performance


  1. Velocity Optimization of Pure Electric Vehicles with Traffic Dynamics Consideration Liuwang Kang, Haiying Shen, and Ankur Sarker Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia

  2. Outline • Introduction • System Design • Performance Evaluation • Conclusion 2

  3. Introduction Factors impeding wide electric vehicle application  Short driving range 700 Driving range (Mile) 600 500 60% 400 300 200 100 0 Tradtional vehicle Pure EV Vehicle type Driving range per battery charge or full fuel fill 3

  4. Introduction Factors impeding wide electric vehicle application  Short driving range  Limited battery cycle life 1.1 700 Driving range (Mile) 600 1 Capacity (Ah) 500 0.9 60% 400 0.8 300 0.7 200 0.6 100 0.5 0 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 Tradtional vehicle Pure EV Battery cycle life (times) Vehicle type Driving range per battery charge or full fuel fill Battery cycle life of lithium-ion battery 4

  5. Introduction Solution: Velocity optimization  Consider constraints such as vehicle acceleration, speed limit, stop sign and traffic light on the road https://t3.ftcdn.net/jpg/01/51/49/66/500_F_151496666_8VitGP5svgi3vOOZz3NpeytN53jz3sh2.jpg 5

  6. Introduction Solution: Velocity optimization  Consider constraints such as vehicle acceleration, speed limit, stop sign and traffic light on the road  Optimize the velocity profile to reduce total energy consumption https://t3.ftcdn.net/jpg/01/51/49/66/500_F_151496666_8VitGP5svgi3vOOZz3NpeytN53jz3sh2.jpg 6

  7. Introduction Solution: Velocity optimization  Consider constraints such as vehicle acceleration, speed limit, stop sign and traffic light on the road  Optimize the velocity profile to reduce total energy consumption Energy consumption reduced by 20% https://t3.ftcdn.net/jpg/01/51/49/66/500_F_151496666_8VitGP5svgi3vOOZz3NpeytN53jz3sh2.jpg 7

  8. Introduction Challenges of current velocity optimization methods  How to estimate waiting vehicles in the traffic signal areas 8

  9. Introduction Challenges of current velocity optimization methods  How to estimate waiting vehicles in the traffic signal areas  How to apply waiting vehicle information into velocity optimization Waiting vehicles 9

  10. Introduction Our method: DP-based velocity optimization system  Propose vehicle movement (VM) model … 10

  11. Introduction Our method: DP-based velocity optimization system  Propose vehicle movement (VM) model  Build queue length model Queue length … 11

  12. Introduction Our method: DP-based velocity optimization system  Propose vehicle movement (VM) model  Build queue length model  Apply vehicle queue length into DP (Dynamic Programming) algorithm V optimized Computing Storage Queue length … 12

  13. System Design Overview Queue length model Traffic volume VM model Arrival vehicle Leaving rate vehicle rate Waiting vehicles in traffic signal areas 13

  14. System Design Overview Queue length model Constraints Speed limit Traffic volume VM model Stop sign Arrival vehicle Leaving rate vehicle rate Acceleration Waiting vehicles in traffic signal areas DP-based velocity optimization 14

  15. System Design Overview Queue length model Constraints Speed limit Traffic volume VM model Stop sign Arrival vehicle Leaving Optimized rate vehicle rate velocity profile Acceleration Waiting vehicles in traffic signal areas DP-based velocity optimization 15

  16. System Design Energy consumption model of pure EVs  Driving force: dv 1         2 F m A C v mg sin mg cos drive f d dt 2 Driving force of pure EV 16

  17. System Design Energy consumption model of pure EVs  Driving force: dv 1         2 F m A C v mg sin mg cos drive f d dt 2  Energy generated by the battery pack: Driving force of pure EV  UQ  E 1 2 𝑉 - Battery pack voltage; 𝑅 - Charge consumption; 𝜃 1 - Battery transforming efficiency; 𝜃 2 - Powertrain working efficiency; 17

  18. System Design Energy consumption model of pure EVs  Driving force: dv 1         2 F m A C v mg sin mg cos drive f d dt 2  Energy generated by the battery pack: Driving force of pure EV  UQ  E 1 2  Energy consumption per time: 𝑉 - Battery pack voltage; F v   drive 𝑅 - Charge consumption;  U 𝜃 1 - Battery transforming efficiency; 1 2 𝜃 2 - Powertrain working efficiency; 18

  19. System Design Traffic dynamics in traffic signal areas Queue length model is built to estimate waiting vehicle numbers in traffic signal areas:  Vehicle arrival rate V in  Vehicle leaving rate V out Queue length= nd d V in V out … n+1 n 2 1 19

  20. System Design Traffic dynamics in traffic signal areas  Arrival vehicle rate V in : estimated based on real-time traffic volume Arrival and leaving vehicle rates 20

  21. System Design Traffic dynamics in traffic signal areas  Arrival vehicle rate V in : estimated based on real-time traffic volume  Vehicle leaving rate V out : estimated with vehicle movement Arrival and leaving vehicle rates model 21

  22. System Design Traffic dynamics in traffic signal areas  Arrival vehicle rate V in : estimated based on real-time traffic volume  Vehicle leaving rate V out : estimated with vehicle movement Arrival and leaving vehicle rates model  Queue length L q : calculated with V in and V out Waiting vehicle numbers in one traffic light period of US-25 highway 22

  23. System Design Traffic dynamics in traffic signal areas  Arrival vehicle rate V in : estimated based on real-time traffic volume  Vehicle leaving rate V out : estimated with vehicle movement Arrival and leaving vehicle rates model  Queue length L q : calculated with V in and V out Waiting vehicle numbers in one traffic light period of US-25 highway 23

  24. Experiment Simulation settings 1. Vehicle parameters in energy consumption model Parameters 𝒏 𝑩 𝒈 𝑫 𝒆 𝝂 𝜽 𝟐 𝜽 𝟑 1.97 m 2 Values 1300 kg 0.33 0.018 0.9 0.97 24

  25. Experiment Simulation settings 1. Vehicle parameters in energy consumption model Parameters 𝒏 𝑩 𝒈 𝑫 𝒆 𝝂 𝜽 𝟐 𝜽 𝟑 1.97 m 2 Values 1300 kg 0.33 0.018 0.9 0.97 2. Experiment road segment on US-25 highway  Total 4050 m long  One stop sign  Two traffic signals  speed limit - 65 mile/hour 25

  26. Experiment Simulation settings 1. Vehicle parameters in energy consumption model Parameters 𝒏 𝑩 𝒈 𝑫 𝒆 𝝂 𝜽 𝟐 𝜽 𝟑 1.97 m 2 Values 1300 kg 0.33 0.018 0.9 0.97 2. Experiment road segment on US-25 highway  Total 4050 m long  One stop sign  Two traffic signals  speed limit - 65 mile/hour 3. Velocity optimization results are verified in SUMO environment 26

  27. Experiment Velocity optimization Metric: Total energy consumption during the trip Observation : Reduces by 8.4% Velocity optimization comparisons energy compared with current method in the experiment Reason : Enables EVs to immediately pass through traffic lights without meeting waiting vehicles Consumed energy comparisons 27

  28. Conclusion 1. We proposed a velocity optimization system for EVs with considering queue length in traffic signal areas 2. We conducted velocity optimization simulation study with SUMO to verify our method 28

  29. Conclusion 1. We proposed a velocity optimization system for EVs with considering queue length in traffic signal areas 2. We conducted velocity optimization simulation study with SUMO to verify our method Future work 1. Consider the effect of road gradient on the proposed system 2. More practical experiments in different traffic conditions 29

  30. Thank you! Questions & Comments? Ankur Sarker as4mz@Virginia.edu Ph.D. Candidate Pervasive Communication Laboratory University of Virginia 30

Recommend


More recommend