conflict termination and prevention
play

Conflict Termination and Prevention September 3 - Class 9 Conflict - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Conflict Termination and Prevention September 3 - Class 9 Conflict Termination Over half of all conflicts end in military victory for one side. Those that are not require other means of settlement. Negotiated Settlements Both


  1. Conflict Termination and Prevention September 3 - Class 9

  2. Conflict Termination ● Over half of all conflicts end in military victory for one side. ● Those that are not require other means of settlement.

  3. Negotiated Settlements ● Both sides must overcome the challenge of commitment problems to settle for peace.

  4. Solving commitment problems?

  5. Solving commitment problems? ● Walter: No insurance against cooperation after war ends. ● Third-party guarantor required to ensure that both sides abide to the agreement and to prevent cheating.

  6. Walter’s test DV? IV? What test does she use?

  7. Spoilers can derail agreements ● Spoilers are actors in civil conflicts that can upend negotiations and ensure conflict continues. ● Ex: Hamas in the 1990s, IRA splinters in 1998.

  8. Stedman: Three types of spoilers Limited spoilers -- want specific grievances addressed before agreement is signed. Ex: RPF in Rwanda in 1993.

  9. Greedy Spoilers Upend agreements to get a better deal. Solution: threaten to end negotiations altogether. Ex: RENAMO in Mozambique in 1992.

  10. Total Spoilers Radicals. Don’t want negotiations. All or nothing. Solution: Coercion or elimination. Ex. UNITA in Angola 1992

  11. Potential Problems with Peace Settlements

  12. Potential Problems with Peace Settlements ● Used by one conflict actor to gain advantage over another. ○ Ex. Tajikistan, Angola. ● Spoilers could be mischaracterized, either excluding or including them.

  13. How to prevent conflict? ● Peacekeepers ● Power Sharing ● Power Division

  14. Peacekeeping (Fortna) ● Can ensure compliance or end ongoing conflicts. Why does peacekeeping appear ineffective? Why does peacekeeping work?

  15. Power Sharing ● Can stabilize post-conflict environment. ● Proportional distribution of: ○ Legislative seats. ○ Administrative appointments ○ Armed forces membership ○ Territorial Autonomy ● Exs: Bosnia, El Salvador.

  16. Power Dividing ● Previous conflict antagonists are delegated veto roles in government: ○ Rotating presidency. ○ Judiciary or ombudsman delegated to minority group. ○ PM must be from certain group. ● Ex: Lebanon: ○ President is Christian, PM is Sunni, Speaker of Parliament is Shia.

  17. Problems with conflict prevention?

  18. Problems with conflict prevention? ● Peacekeepers have limited ability to stop conflict recurrence. ○ Ex: Rwanda. ● Power sharing can be subverted by majority. ○ Ex: Tajikistan. ● Power dividing can create deadlock. ○ Ex: Lebanon.

  19. Discussion What is the most effective method of conflict prevention? Can future conflicts be prevented?

  20. Northern Ireland - Good Friday Agreement Final Case

  21. Background ● Conflict in stalemate throughout 1980s and 1990s. ● IRA conducts bombing campaign of England in early 1990s. ● Tony Blair seeks talks.

  22. Good Friday Agreement ● Agreed to by UK, Ireland, Sinn Fein and DUP. ● Ends hostilities. Creates consociational system: both Unionists and Republicans must be in government. ● Equality of citizenship. Devolution of power for UK. ● Police reform. Prisoner release.

  23. Overcoming Challenges What were challenges to peace? How were the challenges overcome? What are some lingering problems?

  24. Is the Good Friday Agreement a good model? Is it applicable to other cases (i.e. Syria)? What are some potential issues with cross- country application?

Recommend


More recommend