Computing the unexpected — and Unpredicted — and Deceptive — and Interesting Reflections
Fifty year prediction about home computers Computing the unexpected — and Unpredicted — and Deceptive — and Interesting Reflections Attributed to Popular Mechanics , 1954
Fifty year prediction about home computers Computing the unexpected — and Unpredicted — and Deceptive — and Interesting Reflections Attributed to Popular Mechanics , 1954 On display at the Smithsonian, Washington, 2000
Fifty year prediction about home computers Computing the unexpected — and Unpredicted — and Deceptive — and Interesting Reflections Attributed to Popular Mechanics , 1954 On display at the Smithsonian, Washington, 2000 A full-scale mock-up of a submarine control room https://archive.org/details/PopularMechanics1954 https://www.hoax-slayer.net/1954-home-computer-hoax/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fauxtography
Unexpected and surprisingly Deceptive Computing the unexpected — and Unpredicted — and Deceptive — and Interesting Reflections Macknik et al , 2011 Foster & Keane, 2015 Kuhn, 2019
Unexpected and surprisingly Deceptive Computing the unexpected — and Unpredicted — and Deceptive — and Interesting Reflections Ortony & Partridge, 1987 Tognazzini, 2010 Figure from: Smith, Dignum & Sonenberg, 2016
Unexpected and Interesting Computing the unexpected — and Unpredicted — and Deceptive — and Interesting Reflections Data mining for useful rules of the form A → B Many possible measures of interestingness Figure from Kirchgessner, 2016 See also Kuo, Lonie, Pearce & Sonenberg, 2014
Unexpected and Interesting Computing the unexpected — and Unpredicted — and Deceptive — and Interesting Reflections Generating interesting behaviours of synthetic characters Images from Lim & Reeves, 2010 Macedo et al , 2019
Computing the unexpected Reflections — and Unpredicted — and Deceptive — and Interesting On Computing the Unexpected Reflections
References Adriaens et al (2019) Discovering Interesting Cycles in Directed Graphs. International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management , pp 1191-1200 Computing the Foster & Keane (2015) Why some surprises are more surprising than others: Surprise as a unexpected metacognitive sense of explanatory difficulty. Cognitive Psychology , 81, pp 74-116 — and Unpredicted Kirchgessner et al (2016) Testing Interestingness Measures in Practice: A Large-Scale Analysis — and Deceptive of Buying Patterns. IEEE Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics , pp 547-556 — and Interesting Kuhn (2019) Experiencing the Impossible . MIT Press, 292 pp Reflections Kuo, Lonie, Pearce & Sonenberg (2014) Mining Surprising Patterns and their Explanations in Clinical Data. Applied Artificial Intelligence 28, pp 111-138 Lim & Reeves (2010) Computer agents versus avatars. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68, pp 57-68 Macedo et al (2019) A Contrast-Based Computational Model of Surprise and Its Applications. Topics in Cognitive Science 11, pp 88-102 Macknik, Martinez-Conde & Blakeslee (2011) Sleights of Mind: What the Neuroscience of Magic Reveals about Our Everyday Deceptions , 291 pp Ortony & Partridge (1987) Surprisingness and Expectation Failure: What’s the Difference? IJCAI , pp 106-108 Reisenzein et al (2017) The cognitive-evolutionary model of surprise: A review of the evidence. Topics in Cognitive Science 11, pp 50-74 Smith, Dignum & Sonenberg (2016) The Construction of Impossibility: A Logic-Based Analysis of Conjuring Tricks. Frontiers in Psychology doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00748 Tognazzini (1993) Principles, Techniques, and Ethics of Stage Magic and Their Application to Human Interface Design. INTERCHI 93 pp 355-362
Recommend
More recommend