Comparison of Many Categories in Small-Multiple Displays J. Kehrer - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

comparison of many categories in
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Comparison of Many Categories in Small-Multiple Displays J. Kehrer - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A Model for Structure-based Comparison of Many Categories in Small-Multiple Displays J. Kehrer 1,2 , H. Piringer 2 , W. Berger 2 , M. E. Grller 1 1 Institute of Computer Graphics & Algorithms, Vienna University of Technology, Austria 2


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A Model for Structure-based Comparison of Many Categories in Small-Multiple Displays

  • J. Kehrer1,2, H. Piringer2, W. Berger2, M. E. Gröller1

1 Institute of Computer Graphics & Algorithms,

Vienna University of Technology, Austria

2 VRVis Research Center, Vienna, Austria

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Comparison of Multi-variate Data

Johannes Kehrer 2

split by categories

Categorical & numerical attributes Example: sales data

Dimensions (categorical)

Geographic region Product category Product

Timestamps

Ship date Order date

Measures (numerical)

Profit Sales

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Small-multiple Displays

Johannes Kehrer 3

Comparison by juxtaposition Ineffective with many categories Precise comparison when aligned

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Visual Comparison [Gleicher et al. 2011]

Johannes Kehrer 4

Explicit encoding

Compare to 2010

Overlay (superposition)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Visual Comparison [Gleicher et al. 2011]

Johannes Kehrer 5

Explicit encoding

Compare to 2010

Overlay (superposition)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Many Options for Comparison

Johannes Kehrer 6

Compare to maximum Compare East to West Compare years to 2010 Compare each year to previous one Compare quarters to average per year

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Formalism to define references (what-to-what)

Based on hierarchical

structure of display Comparison within/across hierarchy levels

Model for Structure-based Comparison

Johannes Kehrer 7 Geographic region: Year: Quarter:

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Table Algebra [Stolte et al. 2002]

Johannes Kehrer 8

Display configuration from cross/nest operator

{West, East} x {2010, 2011, 2012} x {Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4} x {Furniture, Office Suppl.} /

{Tables, Bookcases, Paper, Envelopes, Appliances} (East, 2010, Q3, Furniture, Tables)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Our Model: Absolute vs. Relative Comparison

Johannes Kehrer 9

Compare to 2010 Compare to next year

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Roles of Dimensions

Johannes Kehrer 10

Compare to next year Comparing dimensions relate different categories (e.g., years) Refining dimensions relate equivalent categories (e.g., quarters)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Reference n-tuple rabs = {r1, r2, …, rn} where (ri = ø) ʌ (ri ∈ dimensioni) Change categories where ri ≠ ø (comparing dimensions)

Absolute Reference Specification

Johannes Kehrer 11

n … number of dimensions

rabs= {ø, Q3, ø, ø}

year quarter product product category

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Relative Reference Specification

Compare to preceding/ following category within comparing dimension Comparing dimensions need logical ordering

Johannes Kehrer 12

Compare to next year

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Relative Reference Specification

Johannes Kehrer 13

rrel = {ø, Q2} Reference n-tuple rrel = {r1, r2, …, rn} where (ri = ø) ʌ (ri ∈ ordinal dimensioni) Increase/decrease categories where ri ≠ ø (comparing dimensions)

n … number of dimensions

rrel = {2011, ø}

year quarter year quarter

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Intermediate Aggregates (IAs)

Johannes Kehrer 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Intermediate Aggregates (IAs)

Johannes Kehrer 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Application Example: Parameter Space Analysis

Johannes Kehrer

Car engine simulation Design & operating parameters Maximize torque rabs= {-30, ø, A, ø}

IVCS speed load

  • config. type

A

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Application Example: Parameter Space Analysis

Johannes Kehrer

Sensitivity wrt. design parameter rrel= {-30, ø, ø, ø}

IVCS speed load

  • config. type
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Comparison of Vessel Movement

Johannes Kehrer 18

Visualization based on Kernel Density Estimates

[Daae Lampe et al. 2010/2011]

Peaks and changes in traffic

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Conclusions

Formal model for structure-based comparison Definition of comparisons within/across hierarchy levels Independent of type of visualization Compact specification based on reference tuple Applied in different application examples Future Work

Integrated visualization of reference graph Interactive reference specification

Johannes Kehrer 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Acknowledgements

  • A. Pobitzer & O.Daae Lampe

Data courtesy of Tableau Software, Inc., AVL List GmbH, HAKOM Solutions GmbH & Co KG, and Norwegian Coastal Administration Austrian Science Fund (FWF) and Austrian Funding Agency (FFG)

Johannes Kehrer 20