commmunity advisory group meeting 1
play

COMMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP MEETING #1 June 23, 2010 INTRODUCTIONS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

COMMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP MEETING #1 June 23, 2010 INTRODUCTIONS Illinois Department of Transportation Clark Dietz, Inc. Huff & Huff, Inc. Planning Communities, LLC. Community Advisory Group (CAG) members MEETING OUTLINE


  1. COMMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP MEETING #1 June 23, 2010

  2. INTRODUCTIONS  Illinois Department of Transportation  Clark Dietz, Inc.  Huff & Huff, Inc.  Planning Communities, LLC.  Community Advisory Group (CAG) members

  3. MEETING OUTLINE  Agenda Review the public involvement process Discuss the initial findings Define the transportation problem Establish the next steps in the process  CAG Notebooks Meeting materials Reference materials

  4. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS  Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) review  Ground rules  Role of the Community Advisory Group (CAG)  Meeting timetable

  5. WHAT IS CONTEXT SENSITIVE SOLUTIONS? Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) is an interdisciplinary approach that seeks effective, multimodal transportation solutions by working with stakeholders to develop a cost- effective transportation facility which will fit into and reflect the project’s surroundings – its “context” . An IDOT CSS project:  Considers project’s context  Fosters communication and collaboration  Environmentally sensitive  Exercises design flexibility

  6. WHY USE CONTEXT SENSITIVE SOLUTIONS?  Open and transparent process  Find solutions to transportation and community issues  Add lasting value to community, environment and transportation system  Create working relationships

  7. THE CSS PROCESS Identify Context Define and Evaluation Define Preferred Evaluate Criteria Problem Alternative Alternatives Identify Stakeholders Considerations Stakeholder Considerations / Community Assets Environmental Considerations / Compatibility with the Environment Engineering Considerations / Transportation Needs

  8. IDENTIFYING CONTEXT VISIBLE Economics Safety & Environment REGIONAL Health Mobility Aesthetics Social & Right-of-Way Cultural Constraints INVISIBLE LOCAL Land Use

  9. IDENTIFYING CONTEXT

  10. REGIONAL CONTEXT I-55 at Weber Rd

  11. LOCAL CONTEXT Rodeo Dr./119 th St Colleges Windham Pkwy. Residential Parks/Open lands Normantown Rd. Warehouse and Distribution Farmland Businesses Civic Romeo Rd./135 th St

  12. STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT PLAN (SIP)  Inventory of stakeholders  Responsibilities of participants  Description of opportunities for stakeholder participation  Schedule of public involvement activities Will be available on the study website

  13. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS  Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) review  Ground rules  Role of the Community Advisory Group (CAG)  Meeting timetable

  14. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS  Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) review  Ground rules  Role of the Community Advisory Group (CAG)  Meeting timetable

  15. THE COMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP Assists with: Defining context  Establishing purpose and need  Developing alternatives Community  Advisory Group Could consist of: (CAG) Community leaders  Interested stakeholders  Responsibilities include: Interest General Groups Public Providing input  Local Businesses Attending meetings  Collaborating with the Project Study Group 

  16. TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUPS Assists with: Evaluation of alternatives  Specific issues  Technical Could consist of parties interested in: Advisory Group Transportation & engineering  (TAG) Environment & land Use  Responsibilities include: Provide input  Attend TAG meetings  Collaborate with the Project Study  Group

  17. PROJECT STUDY GROUP Clark Dietz, Inc. & Sub-Consultants

  18. PROJECT STUDY GROUP Community Advisory Group (CAG) Project Study Group (PSG) Clark Dietz, Inc. & Sub-Consultants Technical Advisory Group (TAG)

  19. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS  Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) review  Ground rules  Role of the Community Advisory Group (CAG)  Meeting timetable

  20. MEETING TIMETABLE

  21. INITIAL FINDINGS  Regional growth  Future growth  Traffic  Crashes  Context Survey results

  22. PROBLEM STATEMENT WORKSHOP What are the transportation problems at the I-55 at Weber Road interchange?

  23. CONSIDERATIONS Economics VISIBLE Safety & Health Environment INVISIBLE Mobility Aesthetics Social & Right-of-Way Cultural Constraints Land Use LOCAL REGIONAL

  24. THANK YOU! Community Advisory Group Meeting #2 August 2010

Recommend


More recommend