columbia generating
play

Columbia Generating Station No Nukes Northwest Columbia Generating - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Case for Retiring Columbia Generating Station No Nukes Northwest Columbia Generating Station The Only Nuclear Power Plant in the Northwest Boiling water reactor used to produce heat to run turbines to create electricity (same as


  1. The Case for Retiring Columbia Generating Station

  2. No Nukes Northwest

  3. Columbia Generating Station The Only Nuclear Power Plant in the Northwest  Boiling water reactor used to produce heat to run turbines to create electricity (same as Fukushima)  Uranium fueled  Located on the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in eastern Washington just north of Richland, Kennewick and Pasco  Cooled by the Columbia River

  4. CGS

  5. CGS

  6. CGS

  7. CGS has generated electricity with nuclear power for 30 years… but supplies only 3.9% of the Northwest region’s needs .

  8. Nuclear Power Dirty Dangerous Expensive

  9. It is Dirty Utah Uranium Mine

  10. Carbon Emitted per Kilowatt * 12.01 25.09 9.2 11.58 8.2 Total: 66.08 g/kWh *Uranium mining

  11. Not the Carbon Free Energy as Advertised Life Cycle GHG Emissions (bas ed on Sovacool, Energy Policy 36 (2008) 2940– 2953)  Construction Wind (ons hore)  Milling, Mining and Enrichment Hydroelectric  Heavy Water Production Solar (parabolic trough)  Energy NW Paducah Fuel Contract Solar (PV) Nuclear Nuclear Natural gas (CCCT) Coal (with s crubbing) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 g CO2eq/kWh

  12. It is Dangerous Design  Location  Radioactive Legacy 

  13. Fukushima vs. CGS “Atomic energy is a stupid way to boil water.” ~ Buckminster Fuller

  14. Boiling Water Reactor Design at Fukushima Daiichi Spent Fuel Pool

  15. Spent Fuel Pool Design Fukushima Dai-ichi Reactor Unit 4

  16. Increased Failure Rate Aging Reactors

  17. CGS Problems to Date  Safety issues  Electrical fires  Aging parts

  18. Location June 14, 2011 Fort Calhoun, NB and Missouri River

  19. Wildfires on the Hanford Reservation

  20. Known Earthquakes Affecting Hanford Region Year: 1872 Magnitude 7.4 Hanford

  21. Hanford

  22. Newly-Discovered Earthquake Potential  Hanford lies on 12 known earthquake fault lines  Tied to Puget Sound subduction zone

  23. Hanford Reservation

  24. Grand Coulee Dams on the Columbia River Hanford Portland

  25. Grand Coulee Earthquake • 1872 earthquake epicenter was less than 100 miles from Grand Coulee site

  26. Teton Dam Collapse 1976

  27. CGS Nov 17, 2013 3.2 Earthquake epicenter

  28. CGS Website on Seismic Bracing

  29. Human Acts of Destruction A terrorist attack on CGS may have been planned by Al Qaeda in 2002

  30. Guarding Spent Fuel Rods at CGS

  31. Squirrels to Solar Flares The electrical grid can be knocked out for hours with common incidents.

  32. It is Dangerous  Radioactive Waste: High and Low Level HOSS: hardened on-site storage for spent fuel rods

  33. Hanford Nuclear Reservation “The most polluted place in the Western Hemisphere”

  34. Radioactive Waste  High Level

  35. HARDENED ON-SITE STORAGE for High Level Waste H.O.S.S.

  36. Radioactive Waste  Low Level

  37. It is Expensive

  38. Market Price (Mid-C) Bathtub Curve

  39. What are the real costs? Columbia Generating Station Operating Expenses

  40. Future Capital Expenditures Needed to Maintain CGS:  Fukushima-type upgrades including filters and vents ($24- 30 million)  Seismic upgrades (unknown $$)  Normal end-of-life part replacements including the steam generator and turbines ($122 m)

  41. “ No days lost in 10 years”  The truth is that the maintenance time for 2011 which was scheduled to be 80 days stretched to 175 days because of the replacement of the brass condenser

  42. Potential Economic Consequences of Meltdown  Intense contamination of the Columbia River  Displacement of large groups of residents (Richland, Kennewick, Pasco and possibly beyond to Portland/Vancouver)  Creation of hundreds of square miles of uninhabitable land  Major economic impact on industries

  43. 50 mile radius = 300,000 people Yakima Pendleton

  44. Industries within 50 Miles of Hanford  Salmon  Fruit, vegetables and hops  Wine  Research & Fabrication Companies ◦ Battelle NW Labs ($1 billion annual revenue) ◦ Areva nuclear fuel fabrication (French company) ◦ Silicon manufacturers

  45. Double Jeopardy: Hanford Waste and CGS K Priest Rapids Columbia River B-C Dam 15 miles Tank Farms CGS

  46. Hanford Nuclear Waste  K Basin: spent fuel from nuclear production reactors (1968) considered one of most vulnerable sites at Hanford because of corroded pools  WESF: largest concentration of strontium and cesium in the world; no containment or back-up systems; located near the tank farms  Tank Farms: enough plutonium to make 70 nuclear bombs  CGS: above-ground holding pool (similar to Fukushima) is already 2/3rds full of spent fuel

  47. B Reactor

  48. Path to a Nuclear-Free Energy Plan

  49. What is Needed to Replace the 3.9% Electricity Produced by CGS?  Conservation through efficient technology and PUD incentives ( Potential energy savings: 3 to 5%)  Safer, cleaner energy production through alternatives like wind and solar

  50. Energy Efficiencies  Residential: LED, heat pump and power strip technologies as well as monitoring equipment  Commercial and Industrial: new building systems as well as retrofits, greater use of combined heat and power (CHP) systems, new agricultural energy technologies

  51. Renewable Energy Sources Reported by Washington Utilities 2012 Wind 75% Solar .02% Biomass 2% Landfill Gas .6% Hydro Upgrades 22%

  52. Alternative Energy Has Relative Short Start-Up Time  Exelon’s first commercial wind farm only started operating in January 2012. The company now has 44 wind projects operating in 10 different states.  Nuclear plant takes 10-15 years to build.

  53. Other Regions Are Well On Their Way to Alternatives to Nuclear According to Christopher Crane, the CEO of energy giant Exelon, “as wind power increases, nuclear power will decrease”

  54. Driving Factors to Abandon Nuclear: Costs and Safety Concerns Are Global Concern  U.K.’s plan to build 10 new nuclear power plants just lost the backing of British utility Centrica  In Japan, only two of 54 have been allowed to continue operation  Germany plans to shut down all of its nuclear plants by 2022

  55. Citizens Don’t Want It 50,000 Germans block railway deliveries of uranium (Nov 2010) “Nuclear power is everywhere – no thank you!” Germany 2012

  56. What about the Costs of Decommissioning?  Much of it could be covered by foregone capital expenditures needed for new Fukushima- driven regulatory requirements

  57. Nuclear power is dirty, dangerous and expensive. There are alternatives!

  58. What You Can Do  Support the closing of CGS for safety and economic reasons  Support energy conservation  Contact Kitzhaber, DeFazio, Merkley and Wyden

  59. ShutDownCGS.wordpress.com

  60. http://www.energy- northwest.com/news/2011/documents/NR %2011- 11%20Nuclear%20Energy%20Facility%20 Connects%20to%20Power%20Grid%20FI NAL.pdf

  61. Tokyo

  62. Information on Fukushima Radiation http://news.nationalgeographic.com/new s/energy/2013/08/130807-fukushima- radioactive-water-leak/ http://ww.activistpost.com/2013/10/some thing-is-killing-life-all-over.html

Recommend


More recommend