coding workshop
play

Coding Workshop Wednesday 9 th May 2018 In Introduction & - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Coding Workshop Wednesday 9 th May 2018 In Introduction & Agenda Item Time Speaker Arrival & Registration 10:00 - 10:30 Welcome introduction 10:30 10:35 Melanie Hingorani Introduction to the NCO, HRGs, grouping and 10:35 -


  1. Coding Workshop Wednesday 9 th May 2018

  2. In Introduction & Agenda Item Time Speaker Arrival & Registration 10:00 - 10:30 Welcome introduction 10:30 – 10:35 Melanie Hingorani Introduction to the NCO, HRGs, grouping and 10:35 - 11:20 Derek Beebe clinical coding The ophthalmology Expert Working Group 11:20 - 11:40 Wojciech Kawatowski and ophthalmic issues Contracting & costs basics 11:40 - 12:00 Richard Allen Lunch 12:00 - 12:40 Coding and coders in practice 12:40- 13:00 Robert Gray Coding practical & feedback 13:00 - 13:45 Group work Working together to improve coding 13:45 - 14:00 Badrul Hussain Shared Guidelines 14:00 - 14:15 Melanie Hingorani Shared guidelines practical & feedback 14.15 - 14.45 Group work Summary & next steps 14:45 - 15:00 MH/BH

  3. Coding Workshop: Housekeeping • Fire • There is no alarm test today • If the alarm sounds it is not a drill and you should leave via the nearest exit • Toilets • Phones & laptops • Please can these be off or silent/closed during the presentations unless needed for the workshop • Breaks • Refreshments will be served mid-morning and mid- afternoon just help yourself as no formal ‘breaks’ are built in - apart from lunch • Lunch break (40 mins) food/drinks will be served • Wi-Fi Code • On the flip chart

  4. UKOA Coding Workshop Aims Melanie Hingorani: UKOA Chair & Moorfields Eye Hospital Consultant

  5. UKOA Membership Member Provider Trusts Stakeholders: Moorfields Eye Hospital NHSFT Addenbrookes Hospital, (Cambridge University Royal College of Manchester Royal Eye Hospital (Central University NHSFT) Hospitals NHSFT) Ophthalmologists Leicester Royal Infirmary (University Hospitals of Leicester Gloucestershire Hospitals NHSFT BIOS NHST) United Lincolnshire Hospitals College of Optometrists Queen Elizabeth Hospital (University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust Bolton NHSFT RCN Ophthalmic Nursing Forum NHSFT) James Paget University Hospitals. NHSFT Ophthalmology CRG Newcastle Eye Centre, (Royal Victoria Infirmary (Newcastle Royal Glamorgan Hospital & Royal Cornwall Hospitals Ophthalmology GIRFT upon Tyne Hospitals NHSFT) NHST RNIB Bristol Eye Hospital, (University Hospitals Bristol NHSFT Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust Macular Society Queens Medical Centre (Nottingham University Hospitals Derby Hospital NHS FT IGA NHST) North West Anglia NHS Trust St Paul’s Eye Unit, (Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust Hospitals NHST) Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Foundation Trust University Hospital Southampton NHSFT Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust Oxford Eye Hospital Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust John Radcliffe Hospital (Oxford University Hospitals NHSFT) Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHST Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHSFT Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Sunderland Eye Infirmary, (City Hospitals Sunderland NHSFT) The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

  6. UKOA A whole system alliance which could: • Provide a forum for regular liaison and discussion on efficiency, quality and other mutual areas of interest between key stakeholders for ophthalmic services • Join the expertise of clinical professionals with expertise from managers and trust leaders in commissioning, operational management and financial flows in ophthalmology • Establish quality standards and best practice or efficiency pathways agreed between all the key professional bodies and providers and patient bodies covering care provided by any ophthalmic professional in any setting • Provide a process to use NHS digital data and provider supplied data, informed by GIRFT results, allowing benchmarking of processes and outcomes to drive up standards • Provide buddying and support to improve quality and efficiency between providers with good and less good performance in specific areas • A group with a powerful voice who can negotiate locally and nationally for the benefit of ophthalmology commissioning and resourcing, and champion the specialty.

  7. Data and costs Quality standards Services and staff Service models, staffing (numbers, Coding, tariffs, skill mix, training procurement (devices Safety/governance, AHPs, community), and consumables), delays, patient capacity, educating & data: IT systems use standards, pathway working with (virtual, EPR, PACS), standards, disease commissioners, using national data care standards standardised systems pathways & best delivery models Glaucoma / Cataract / Urgent Care / Macular Training and support National lobbying

  8. Coding • Confusion and anxiety amongst clinicians • Lack of coordinated working between coding and clinical staff • Inadequate record keeping • No agreed consistent methodology • Complex coding system and for most shrouded in mystery • Perverse incentives and gaming the system

  9. Aims of f the coding work stream • Training and education • Agreement for consistency of coding across trusts • Improve understanding and better co-operation between coders and clinicians • Marrying of coding and clinicians terminology • More clear (legible, detailed, consistent, including comorbidities) clinician recording to allow better coding • To identify and address gaps in national coding system for: • amendments or new codes • to remove obsolete codes • To obtain tariffs which reflect actual costs of procedures • Using ophthalmic EPRs for coding • Removing perverse incentives from coding

  10. Outputs of f the coding work stream • Handbook of background for clinicians – understanding codes and costing • Basic good practice standard for coding for ophthalmic clinicians • Guidelines for consistency of coding across trusts • Wider involvement in EWG or advice group? • Audit tool

  11. UKOA Clinical Coding Workshop [An Introduction to HRGs] presented by Derek Beebe, Casemix Consultant

  12. Overview • Introduction to Casemix and HRGs • Casemix, HRGs, the NCO, Who does what • HRG Design • Clinical codes, What is an HRG?, What’s in an HRG? • HRG4+ • HRG4+, From Costing to Payment, Subchapter BZ • HRG Grouping • Core and unbundled, Basic Principles • What coders and clinicians need to know 12

  13. In Introduction to Casemix and HRGs Casemix, HRGs, th the NCO and Who does what 13

  14. Casemix and Healthcare Resource Groups (HRGs) • Casemix : A method of classifying patient care based on the expected clinical resource use for the provision of that care. • HRGs : HRGs are clinically meaningful groupings of patient activity derived primarily from procedure (OPCS-4) and diagnosis (ICD-10) codes recorded within patient records. • HRGs are the primary currency used by the NHS in England to collect national reference costs and for national reimbursement. 14

  15. The National Casemix Office • HRGs are the main Casemix Classification within the NHS in England and are developed and maintained by the National Casemix Office (NCO) at NHS Digital. • The NCO is an impartial, independent body accountable to the NHS, NHS England, NHS Improvement and the Department of Health and Social Care. Our remit is to develop and enforce national standards underpinning the monitoring, measurement and improvement of healthcare performance at a local, regional and national level. • HRGs are developed by the NCO together with a broad range of stakeholders: NHS England, NHS Improvement and the Department of Health and Social Care as well as NHS senior clinicians, finance and information colleagues, who make up our Expert Working Groups (EWGs). 15

  16. Who does what

  17. HRG Design Buil ilding blo locks, What is is an HRG?, , What is is in in an HRG?, , Why things ch change 17

  18. HRG Design – Buil ilding blo locks • Casemix: A system whereby the complexity of care provided to a patient is reflected in an aggregate secondary healthcare classification Aggregating >50 codes PBC 11B Asthma HRG4+ DZ15Q Asthma Grouping 2,879 codes without Interventions, with CC Score 3-5 ICD-10 (diagnosis) Coding >20,000 codes J45.9 Asthma, unspecified and/or OPCS-4 (procedure) SNOMED CT Terming >340,000 codes Asthma (Concept ID 195967001)

  19. HRG Design – Building blocks • Building blocks – Primary Classifications: • ICD-10 diagnosis codes • Developed by WHO • Maintained in the UK by Clinical Classification Service • Previous update: April 2016, ICD-10 5 th Edition • Next update: ICD-11? • OPCS-4.8 procedure codes • Developed and maintained by Clinical Classification Service at NHS Digital • PYZ = procedure codes, approach codes, site codes • e.g., laparoscopic wide excision of left kidney: • M02.1 Nephrectomy and excision of perirenal tissue + • Y75.2 Laparoscopic approach to abdominal cavity NEC + • Z94.3 Left sided operation • Previous update: April 2017, OPCS-4.8 • Next update: April 2020, OPCS-4.9 19

  20. HRG Design – What is an HRG? • An HRG is an aggregated grouping of patient-level data that is: • Clinically meaningful • Similar in expected resource use • Manageable in numbers • Generated from readily available [mandated] data. • HRGs are: • Separated into chapters (not really used) • Separated into subchapters, basically aligned with body systems – starting with the head (AA) and finishing with urology and male reproductive (LB) or alternatively gynaecology (MA), followed by the odds and ends 20

Recommend


More recommend