+ Co- payme nts injur ing physiothe r apy? A c a se study o f a priva te pra c tic e in Auc kla nd, Ne w Ze a la nd in 2013.
+ Ba c kg ro und Be fo re 2009, no c ha rg e fo r ACC pa tie nts F ro m 2009 o nwa rds, pa tie nts c ha rg e d a c o -pa yme nt Co nc e rn ra ise d b y sta ke ho lde rs Dr Nic k Smith: “ACC will mo nito r c lie nt a c c e ss to se e if the re is a n a dve rse impa c t o n a ny spe c ific g ro up” (ACC, 2009a , p1) No e vide nc e o f this.
+ Study q ue stio n Wha t a re the c o nse q ue nc e s o f the physio the ra py pa tie nt c o -pa yme nts fo r a priva te pra c tic e in Auc kla nd, Ne w Ze a la nd? Re sults to re fle c t c o nfide nc e in o r c o nc e rn a b o ut the c ha ng e in po lic y Re sults ma y indic a te whe the r a la rg e -sc a le Go ve rnme nt e nq uiry is ne c e ssa ry, a s wa s o rig ina lly pro mise d
+ Study’ s ne c e ssity L ite ra ture re vie w o f 11 studie s inve stig a te d the e ffe c ts o f c o -pa yme nts o n pa tie nts se e king prima ry he a lth c a re Re sults sho we d tha t e xisting c o -pa yme nts: De c re a se utilisa tio n De c re a se he a lth sta tus Ne g a tive ly impa c t life style Mixe d re sults fo r inc re asing o r intro duc ing a c o -pa yme nt ACC’ s c o -pa yme nt ha s no w b e e n e xisting fo r fo ur ye a rs
+ Study de sig n Qua lita tive study de sig n Ca se study o f a priva te pra c tic e Purpo sive sa mpling E ig ht pa rtic ipa nts via ‘ typic a l c a se sa mpling ’ F o ur pa tie nts via ‘ ma ximum va ria tio n sa mpling ’
+ Pa rtic ipa nt re c ruitme nt Priva te pra c tic e in Gle n I nne s via Physio the ra py So c ie ty Pa rtic ipa nt I nfo rma tio n She e t issue d to sta ff a nd pa tie nts Pa rtic ipa nt e lig ib ility c rite ria : Wo rke d/ a tte nde d c linic fro m b e fo re -2009 to c urre nt da te Ab le to c o mmunic a te in E ng lish T ho se inte re ste d e ma ile d myse lf o r my supe rviso r
+ Da ta c o lle c tio n & a na lysis Se mi-struc ture d inte rvie ws with pre -de te rmine d q ue stio ns I n-pe rso n inte rvie ws Priva te ro o ms a t physio the ra py c linic I nduc tive a na lysis (T ho ma s, 2006)
+ Re sults (so fa r) F ra nc hise ma na g e r, c linic a l ma na g e r, physio the ra pist a nd re c e ptio nist: De c re a se utilisa tio n o f physio the ra py, e spe c ia lly lo w SE S De c re a se d fre q ue nc y o f a ppo intme nts pe r pa tie nt Pa tie nts pre se nting with mo re c hro nic injurie s Physio the ra pists lo sing pa yme nts De c re a se d time spe nt with pa tie nts = de c re a se d q ua lity? I nc re a se d pa tie nt c o mplia nc e T wo pa tie nts to inte rvie w this we e k
+ Stre ng ths a nd limita tio ns Stre ng ths Qua lita tive no t q ua ntita tive Se mi-struc ture d a nd in-pe rso n inte rvie ws Que stio ns use d L imita tio ns Ca se study is no t g e ne ra lisa b le Sma ll numb e r o f pa rtic ipa nts Physio the ra pists o ve r-re pre se nte d Ulte rio r mo tive fo r pa rtic ipa tio n? Po sitio na lity
+ Sig nific a nc e a nd implic a tio ns o f finding s F inding s a re simila r to tho se o f lite ra ture re vie w Do e s no t imply tha t the se re sults will b e fo und in e ve ry priva te physio the ra py pra c tic e But it do e s indic a te tha t the re is a ne e d to re se a rc h the se e ffe c ts furthe r, a s the c urre nt re sults sho w the c o -pa yme nts a re ne g a tive ly e ffe c ting pa tie nts a nd physio the ra pists F uture re se a rc h sho uld inc lude : Gre a te r numb e rs o f pa rtic ipa nts Pa rtic ipa nts who c a n no lo ng e r se e k physio the ra py Pa rtic ipa nts o f diffe ring SE S
Recommend
More recommend
