Clinical Supervision in an Educational Setting: AN UNAVOIDABLE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Clinical Supervision in an Educational Setting: AN UNAVOIDABLE TENSION BETWEEN HOLDING AND ASSESSING Dr Pól Dominic McCann

Background  After 2.5 years working in supervision at ACAP , the main tension noted is that of mentor vs monitor  Presentation is based on conversations with supervisors and supervisees  Elisabeth Shaw’s 2013 paper Mentoring or Monitoring which indicates that this is widespread across the workforce acap.edu.au navitas.com

What is supervision?  Milne (2007) says is in neither therapy nor mentoring – but he takes a very positivist approach and how do you categorise such subjective interactions?  It’s not counselling – but some students will merge the two  Gilbert (2001, p. 200) claims it is naive to believe ‘the proposition that the practices of reflection and clinical supervision are separate and different from processes of surveillance’  Some supervisors say it never happens; others say it does but they contain and redirect; others say they are distinct but there is a need to acknowledge POTT which cannot come about without the student being aware of how their history intersects with their practice acap.edu.au navitas.com

ACAP Supervision: Overarching Aims  Support the supervisee development: personally and professionally  Challenge blindspots, skill deficiencies  Evaluate competence, empathy, self-awareness  Gatekeeping: ensuring graduates are ready to practice competently and ethically (McCann 2015) acap.edu.au navitas.com

The tension is not confined to ACAP  Gilbert (2001, p. 201) Workplace supervision can be managerial rather than reflective  The added impost for training supervisors is that we must assess. And we have the third hat of pedagogy  So setting up a contract early in the term: bracket off expectations for each section  Developing the steps along the way: first assessment needs to focus on skills, less on formulation and conceptualisation acap.edu.au navitas.com

The tension is not confined to ACAP  Larger US psych colleges report boundary issues in supervision which create issues and influences in grading supervisees  APA Ethics Code (APA, 2010) Beneficence and nonmaleficence; fidelity and responsibility; integrity; justice; and respect for people’s rights and dignity  PACFA (2015) 3.1Ethical principles of Counselling and Psychotherapy 3.2.1 Fidelity 3.2.2 Autonomy 3.2.3 Beneficence 3.2.4 Non-maleficence 3.2.5 Justice 3.2.6 Self-respect  These all impact on education and training (Erickson Cornish 2014). acap.edu.au navitas.com

What we see at ACAP  An academically strong student  A student with good skills  A student who seems to be aware… .  … can all fall apart in supervision, despite gatekeeping at several stages acap.edu.au navitas.com

Themes to consider  Impression management  The tension of grading  How to deliver feedback  Power imbalances  Boundaries  Gatekeeping acap.edu.au navitas.com

Impression management and political suicide  Are supervisees going to withhold scenarios in which they may appear less competent? (Shaw 2015)  Supervisor comment: ‘I feel like I’m getting a really watered down version of what's going on for them.’ She tells them ‘if your skills aren't there I have to do something about that but I try and build as much safety as I can’, within a fraught set-up, for someone to bring their innermost inadequacies’ acap.edu.au navitas.com

The tension of being graded:  Students many not present their weaker moments as they want to show their best side  Students are assessed by pass/ fail in relation to their skills  And yet it is actually a strength to show vulnerabilities  ‘It’s about balancing opposites’ acap.edu.au navitas.com

The uses of feedback  Supervision should use ‘corrective feedback on the supervisee’s performance, teaching, collaborative goal setting’ (Milne 2007, p. 439)  Sometimes in group: Can be directed at all, or to one – but it is really directed (indirectly) at the most vulnerable. ‘It’s crucial to work with group dynamics… . I try to catch those teachable moments’ acap.edu.au navitas.com

If too directive…  … does supervision risk losing the ability to foster collaborative knowledge? (Shaw) Is collaboration only viable when there is a graduate-level degree of experience?  Supervisors note that these dynamics occur (generally less frequently) with their private clients: ‘yes but, there’s a reason… ’ And there is a need to ask them to look at themselves first so even outside the educational setting, counselling is in the periphery  Students, need to demonstrate skills ; private supervision is more about a fluid set of criteria. POTT is critical aspect to both. acap.edu.au navitas.com

Delivering feedback  ‘How does one carry out a monitoring function that generates anxiety, when trying to maintain a respectful, collaborative arrangement?’ (Shaw 2013, p.302)  Supervisor asks how it felt to get feedback. Then puts it to one side – does not want to keep repeating. About professionalism, being able to move on. So she will have a private conversation if they are upset  The difficulty of this: ‘it’s a very subjective thing, how counsellors need to be, rather than what counsellors to be doing. An educational institute can only assess the doing . It can’t assess the being , because this is so subjective’ acap.edu.au navitas.com

Where to give feedback?  ‘I try and keep feedback in the group, because if the group miss some of the feedback you have given outside of it, they’re not quite on track with what transpired’  Must be aware of not shaming, especially for directive feedback. This may be delivered privately: Or a combination of both  ‘[ the marking criteria] brings structure to the subjectivity of supervision’  So while grading is seen as a negative in some contexts, the structure of grids assists by removing personality influences acap.edu.au navitas.com

Boundaries  Supervision should not blur into providing counselling of supervisees. Asking for personal insight into a client case is not about asking for self-analysis (McCann 2015)  Brown, Murdoch and Abels (2014, p. 274) note that ”departure from commonly accepted clinical practice that may, at times, be beneficial to the client, and at other times, neutral or even harmful  Shaw (2014, p. 302) notes that ‘primitive feelings’ emerge and create reactions for supervisors and supervisee – and self-censoring follows acap.edu.au navitas.com

Gatekeeping  Is this the right time for you to do this degree?  Students note that it is harder in the field compared to role plays – so we don’t know how they will react until they get onto placement  Supervisors can identify students of concern about from year one: how do we ethically manage students at risk? acap.edu.au navitas.com

Gatekeeping: Do they need counselling?  Some said it never comes up; others said it will but they contain and redirect quickly  How do you not assess POTT without examining the supervisee's back story – one noted that she not get drawn in: errs on these side of boundary but ‘I would be derelict of my duty not to address this’  Cites example of student who did placement where she had been volunteering for 2 years – fearful of going outside her boundary. So this was brought to the student’s attention acap.edu.au navitas.com

Integrative Development Model: Level 1  Motivation and anxiety are high  Seeking structure and guidance in regards to the ‘best’ approach  High-self-focus but limited self-awareness  Apprehensive about being evaluated/ judged  Limited autonomy – they need structure and warm guidance from supervisor: some direct challenge is required (Stoltenberg, McNeill & Delworth 1998) acap.edu.au navitas.com

References  American Psychological Association. (2010, June). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from http: / / www.apa.org/ ethics/ code/ accessed 29 August 2016  Brown, C., Murdock, N. L., & Abels, A. (2014). Ethical issues associated with training in university counseling centres. Training and education in professional psychology, 8 (4), 269- 276.  Erickson Cornish, J. A. (2014). Ethical issues in education and training. Training And Education In Professional Psychology , 8 (4), 197-200  Gilbert, T. (2001). Reflective practice and clinical supervision: meticulous rituals of the confessional. Journal Of Advanced Nursing, 36(2), 199-205. 2648.2001.01960.x  McCann, P .D. (2015). Professional Development Presentation for clinical supervisors, ACAP  Milne, D. (2007). An empirical definition of clinical supervision British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2007, Vol.46(4), pp.437-447  PACFA Code of Ethics retried from: http: / / www.pacfa.org.au/ wp- content/ uploads/ 2014/ 04/ Interim-Code-of-Ethics-2015.pdf accessed 11 August 2016  Stoltenberg, C.D., McNeill, B. and Delworth, U. (1998) IDM Supervision: An Integrated Developmental Model of Supervising Counselors and Therapists. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass acap.edu.au navitas.com

Questions and feedback acap.edu.au navitas.com