� � Ci t y of W i nni peg W at er wor k, W ast e and Di sposal Depar t m ent Phase 1 Techni cal M em or andum f or C om bi ned Sew er O ver f l ow M anagem ent St udy PU BLI C PR ESEN TATI O N Techni cal M em or andum No . 8 I nt er nal Docum ent by : Tet r ES W ARDRO P � and Engi neer i ng I nc . C O N SU LTAN TS W C . I n Associ at i on W i t h : June 1994 G or e & St or r i e Li m i t ed and EM A Ser vi ces I nc .
June 9, 1994 3 : 07pm D I SC LAI M ER Thi s Techni cal M em or andum i s f or i nf or m at i on t o t he Phase 1 W or kshop par t i ci pant s . I t i s a dr af t docum ent i nt ended f or i nt er nal di scussi on and i s not i nt ended as a r epor t r epr esent i ng t he pol i cy or di r ect i on of t he Ci t y of W i nni peg .
� � � � � June 9, 1994 10 : 0 2am TABLE O F C O N TEN TS BAC KG R O U N D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - . . . . 2- 2 . 0 I SSU ES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N STR U C TU R E C O M M U N I C ATI O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3- 3 . 0 . . . . . . . . Y C O M M I TTEE . . 3- 3 . 1 AD VI SO R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3- 3 . 1 . 1 M andat e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Responsi bi l i t i es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4- 3 . 1 . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M em ber shi p . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4- 3 . 1 . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5- 3 . 2 C O N SU LTATI O N 3 . 2 . 1 Sci ent i f i c Consul t at i on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5- 3 . 2 . 2 Publ i c Consul t at i on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6- TI AL C O N SU LTATI O N PR O G R AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7- PO TEN . . . . . . 4 . 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7- 4 . 1 STU D Y PH ASES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7- 4 . 2 M ETH O D S SED C O M M U N I C ATI O N PR O G R AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10- 4 . 3 PR O PO 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10- 4 . 3 . 1 Phase . . . . Phase 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 - 4 . 3 . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14- 4 . 3 . 3 Phase 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15- 4 . 3 . 4 Phase 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17- 4 . 4 SU M M AR Y Publ i c C om m uni cat i on
� � � � � � June 9, 1994 10 : 57am LI ST O F I LLU STR ATI O N S Fi gur e 1 Pr oposed O r gani zat i on : C SO St udy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3- Fi gur e 2 G ener al Appr oach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7- Fi gur e 3 C SO M anagem ent St udy Publ i c C om m uni cat i on Pr ogr am . . . . . . . . . . . 10- Ri ver W Tabl e 1 at er Q ual i t y and C SO s i n W i nni peg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2- Tabl e 2 I l l ust r at i ve Li st f or Consul t at i on wi t h Sci ent i f i c C om m ui t y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6- I l l ust r at i ve Li st f or Consul t at i on wi t h Speci al Tabl e 3 I nt er est G r oups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 6- Publ i c C om m uni cat i on
� � � � June 9, 1994 10 : 02am 1 . 0 BAC KG R O U N D Par t i ci pat i on by t he publ i c i n t he C SO m anagem ent st udy i s war r ant ed f r om t he st andpoi nt f r om bot h Ci t y pol i cy as wel l as t hr ough t he di r ect i on of t he Cl ean Envi r onm ent C om m i ssi on . The Ci t y has est abl i shed pol i cy gui del i nes f or ci t i zen par t i ci pat i on i n publ i c w or ks pr oj ect s . The pol i cy out l i nes cr i t er i a f or pr oj ect s w her e publ i c par t i ci pat i on i s war r ant ed . These cr i t er i a i ncl ude pr oj ect s w hi ch have key st r at egi c i m por t ance i n t he Ci t y' s l ong- t er m pl ans, pr oj ect s w her e t he Ci t y i s seeki ng publ i c i nput , awar eness and suppor t f or a pr oj ect , a hi st or y of publ i c w her e i nvol vem ent i n t he pr oj ect , and pr oj ect s a r equi r em ent exi st s f or Envi r onm ent Act appr oval s . The pot ent i al C SO pr ogr am m eet s t hese cr i t er i a i n t hat t he pot ent i al cost s i nvol ved assi ve, and t he Ci t y wi l l seek publ i c suppor t f or such a cont r ol i n C SO cont r ol ar e m pr ogr am as i t has i n i t s r i ver qual i t y pr ot ect i on pr ogr am s i n t he past . Ther e has been a hi st or y of publ i c i nvol vem ent i n r i ver cont r ol pr oj ect s and t her e wi l l be r equi r em ent s f or endor sem ent of t he pr ogr am f r om M ani t oba Envi r onm ent C SO cont r ol . Envi r onm ent C om m i ssi on ( CEC) i n del i ver i ng i t s r epor t on t he The Cl ean wat er qual i t y obj ect i ves f or t he Red and Assi ni boi ne r i ver s i n June 1992, r ecom m ended t hat an advi sor y i t t ee shoul d be est abl i shed dur i ng i m pl em ent at i on or st eer i ng com m of t he st udy and t hat of t he sci ent i f i c com m uni t y shoul d be i nvi t ed t o col l abor at e i n t he st udy desi gn . m em ber s e speci f i c di r ect i on i n t er m Thus, t he C EC gave som s of consul t at i on wi t h cer t ai n publ i cs . The Ci t y pol i cy gui del i nes pr ovi de di r ect i on i n t er m s of t he obj ect i ves of ci t i zen par t i ci pat i on . The gener al obj ect i ve i s t o obt ai n publ i c suppor t f or a C SO cont r ol pol i cy and t o devel op a pl i sh t he f ol l owi ng : zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA st r at egy f or act i on . Publ i c i nvol vem ent i s i nt ended t o accom " enabl e t he publ i c t o have bet t er under st andi ng of t he C SO cont r ol pl anni ng pr ocess ; hel p det er m i ne and def i ne t he publ i c' s needs ; " " pr ovi de a f or um f or i nt er est ed gr oups and i ndi vi dual s ; " cr eat e under st andi ng am ong st akehol der s of t he t r ade- of f s i nvol ved i n C SO cont r ol opt i ons . Publ i c C om m uni cat i on
Recommend
More recommend