Challenges in Pre-Operative I have no disclosures Evaluation Geoff Stetson, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine, UCSF Hospitalist, San Francisco VA Medical Center Special Thanks Roadmap Heather Nye, MD, PhD Overview of pre-op evaluation Case 1 – 10 Minutes • Professor of Medicine UCSF • Cardiac risk-stratification in pre-operative evaluation • Director of Co-Management Service and Veterans Integrated Preoperative Clinic at San Francisco VA Medical Center • High-risk medications Henry Crevensten, MD Case 2 – 10 Minutes • Associate Professor of Medicine UCSF • Pulmonary risk-stratification in pre-operative evaluation • Director of Quality Improvement at San Francisco VA Medical • OSA considerations Center Case 3 – 5 Minutes • An approach to geriatric pre-operative evaluation 3 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 4 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation
Learning Objectives Goals of Pre-Op Evaluation Evaluate risk of a procedure to a particular patient Understand the risks and benefits of pre-operative evaluation Appropriately risk-stratify a patient from a cardiac standpoint • Allows for informed decision-making Explain how to modify use of certain high-risk medications in the Optimize medical conditions perioperative period Describe PPCs and their role in perioperative care Minimize unnecessary testing Appropriately risk-stratify a patient from a pulmonary standpoint Minimize complications Understand the role of OSA in the perioperative period Develop a holistic framework for approaching the pre-operative evaluation of a geriatric patient 5 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 6 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation Prevalence and Costs Risks of Unnecessary PreOp Testing ~30 million people/yr undergo surgery in US, most ambulatory 1 Delay Cost ~18% of cataract surgery patients had preoperative consultation 2 Harm ~ 50% of preoperative consultants recommended an unnecessary test 3 Worse Patient and System Outcomes Preoperative testing costs ~$18 Billion annually in the U.S. 4 1. Onuoha OC, Arkoosh VA, Fleishre LA. JAMA Int Med. 2014; 174(8):1391-1395 2. Thilen S, Treggiari M, Lange J et al. JAMA Int Med. 2014; 173(3):380-388 3. Kachalia A, Berg A, Fagerlin A, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2015; 162(2):100-108 4. Kumar A, Srivastava U. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Apr;27(2):174-9 7 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 8 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation
Question 1 Case 1 10 Minutes Risk Clearance Stratification 9 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 10 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation General Approach Source of Guiding Principles Pulmonary Cardiac Risk Update H&P Risk Assessment Assessment Optimize Substance Medication Medical Co- Abuse and History Morbidities EtOH Screen 11 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 12 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation
ACC/AHA Flowchart ACC/AHA Flowchart CAD = Coronary Artery Disease, ACS = Acute Coronary Syndrome, GDMT = Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy, MACE = Major Adverse Cardiac Events 13 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 14 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation Risk Calculators RCRI Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) American College of Surgeons (ACS) National • 6 Predictors of MACE (MI, V.fib, Cardiac Arrest, Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Complete Heart Block, Pulm Edema) • 0-1 predictors = low risk • 2+ predictors = high risk • One center; thoracic, vascular, ortho over- represented • Retrospectively validated numerous times Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation 1999;100:1043-9. 15 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 16 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation
RCRI ACS NSQIP Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) 21 predictors, created in 2011 1. CAD (MI, + stress, use NTG, CP c/w angina, Q-waves) 525 US hospitals, > 1 million operations Score % of MACE 2. CHF Calculates risk of: MACE, death, PNA, VTE, AKI, 0 0.4% return to OR, unplanned intubation, discharge to 3. CVA/TIA 1 0.9% rehab/nursing home, surgical infection, UTI 2 6.6% 4. DM (requiring insulin) 3+ 11% 5. CKD (Cr > 2.0 mg/dL) Limitations: Not validated outside NSQIP, unclear 6. High Risk Surgery (suprainguinal vascular, what to do with all the predictive information intraperitoneal, intrathoracic) 17 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 18 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation ACS NSQIP – Inputs Did anyone use a calculator? Which one? How did our patient do? 19 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 20 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation
RCRI ACS NSQIP – Results Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) 1. CAD (MI, + stress, use NTG, CP c/w angina, Q-waves) Score % of MACE 2. CHF 0 0.4% 3. CVA/TIA 1 0.9% 2 6.6% 4. DM (requiring insulin) 3+ 11% 5. CKD (Cr > 2.0 mg/dL) 6. High Risk Surgery (suprainguinal vascular, intraperitoneal, intrathoracic) 21 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 22 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation ACC/AHA Flowchart Functional Capacity 1 MET (metabolic equivalent) = basal O2 consumption of a 70 kg 40-year-old man >10 METs Excellent 7-10 METs Good 4-6 METs Moderate • Climbing 2 flights of stairs, walking up a hill, walking on level ground at 4 mph, heavy work around the house <4 METs Poor • Golfing with golf cart, playing a musical instrument, slow ballroom dancing, walking at 2-3 miles per hour METs = Metabolic Equivalents; CPG = Clinical Practice Guidelines; GDMT = Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy 23 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 24 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation
Functional Capacity ACC/AHA Flowchart Making Beds – 3-5 Broomball – 6.3 Ironing – 2 Cricket – 6.1 Archery – 4.3 Equestrianism (not horseback riding) – 7 Doubles Badminton – 3-4 Ringette – 12.6 Bocce – 2-3 Tobogganing – 7 METs = Metabolic Equivalents; CPG = Clinical Practice Guidelines; GDMT = Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy 25 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 26 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation Medications Diabetes Medications Betablockers ACEI/ARB Now, what about those meds? Statins Anticoagulation Aspirin 27 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 28 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation
Diabetes Meds β Blockers Assuming patient is NPO at MN… In NON-CARDIAC surgery, β blockers: Stop oral meds (including metformin*) • Reduce cardiac events perioperatively Dose reduce long-acting insulin ~25% • Higher risk of death and stroke Stop prandial insulin CONTINUE β blockers for other indications Start sliding-scale insulin DO NOT start β blocker solely for surgery (consider RCRI 3+) 29 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 30 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation ACEI/ARB Statins Continuation associated with hypotension, not Continue statins if patient already taking one worse CV outcomes Consider starting statin if patient to undergo Many hold ACEI/ARB 2/2 concern for vascular procedure perioperative AKI ACC/AHA: “Continuation of ACEIs or ARBs perioperatively is reasonable.” Recommend: if patient on ACEI/ARB for CHF or difficult to control HTN, continue 31 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 32 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation
Anticoagulation Aspirin Aspirin for primary/secondary prevention (excluding prior PCI): • No decrease in death or non-fatal MI • Increased Hemorrhage Stop ASA 5-10 days before procedure, restart 7- 10 days later In patients with previous PCI and intervention, should continue ASA if possible Devereaux PJ et al for the POISE-2 Investigators. Aspirin in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 2014 Mar 31; [e-pub ahead of print]. Graham MM et al. Aspirin in patients with previous percutaneous coronary intervention undergoing noncardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med 2017 Nov 14; [e-pub]. 33 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 34 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation Medications How about that ? Diabetes Medications – Reduce Glargine by 25% Patient Procedure Characteristics Perform EKG? + SSI Characteristics Betablockers – Continue Low Risk Low Risk NO ACEI/ARB – Controversial…+/- Low Risk Int. or High Risk NO High Risk Low Risk NO Statins – Continue High Risk Int. or High Risk YES Anticoagulation – Hold, restart when surgeons deem safe, usually POD 1-3 • Low risk patients – asymptomatic, <10% 10-year risk of CAD Aspirin – Hold • High risk patients – coronary artery, peripheral artery, or cerebrovascular disease, structural heart disease, or arrhythmia • Optimal timing of EKG is unknown, consensus 1-3 months 35 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 36 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation
Recommend
More recommend