Nb 3 Sn Nb-Ti Technology Technology CDR SCU14 in ANKA TDR DEPENDING ON APPROVED FUNDING! 1
CDR proposal – Cost estimate Coldmass cost estimate (per magnet). This cost estimate does not include the auxiliary infrastructure needed for superconducting magnets such as cryo-refrigeration plants, cryostats, power supplies, and current leads Nb 3 Sn, kCHF Nb-Ti, kCHF Comparison - Stable operations - Proven technology, ductile high margin to critical current material but current design and high temperature margin. requires operation at 95% on - More options for cryogenics the load line operation at 4.5 K. - Shorter magnets can produce same field amplitude Tooling 11.6 9.1 Components 321.1 130.2 Design Office 2.1 2.1 Manpower Manufacturing 97.5 75.1 Total Cost 432.2 216.5 2
Nb-Ti Baseline Design • Wiggler with similar parameters as CLIC damping-ring wiggler can be used for beamline at ANKA. • Conceptual design done within CERN-KIT collaboration, technical design within CERN-KIT-BINP collaboration until end of 2011. • Installation until end of 2012 (latest). Open Issues: • What is the contribution of CERN, KIT, and BINP? • Vacuum, cryogenics, magnet protection, measurement, current leads, interconnection issues must be addressed and coordinated. (Establishment of a project structure?) 3
Nb 3 Sn Advanced Design • In parallel with the Nb-Ti baseline design we will advance with the Nb 3 Sn design, first tests have shown the feasibility of Nb 3 Sn. • Nb 3 Sn technology for wiggler is less demanding than for accelerator magnets (inner triplets, LHeC, 11 T dipole projects) because of modular geometry, force distribution, and short unit lengths of wire. Open issues: • Nb 3 Sn short model testing (unavailability of Block 4 until Summer 1011). • For a first full prototype around 20 km strand are needed (approx. 200 kCHF). Strand procurement has a long lead time; when to start with the procurement process? • Nb 3 Sn prototype design is planned to be finished by the end of 2011, but production delay due to LHC consolidation in 2012. 4
Spending Profile Budget 2010 2011 2012 2013 (kCHF) Material 20 220 60 30 Design Office 18 45 55 25 Workshop 32 30 50 80 FSU 50 50 50 100 Misc (Travel) 24 25 25 25 TOTAL 144 370 240 260 5
Recommend
More recommend