CDOT Presentation to the House & Senate Transportation - - PDF document
January 18th, 2007 CDOT Presentation to the House & Senate Transportation Committees 1 Taking Care to Get You There! CDOTs Vision To enhance the quality of life and the environment of the citizens of Colorado by creating an
1
2
Taking Care to Get You There!
To provide the best multi-modal transportation system for Colorado that most effectively moves people, goods, and information. To enhance the quality of life and the environment
by creating an integrated transportation system that focuses on moving people and goods by offering convenient linkages among modal choices.
3
Taking Care to Get You There!
4
Taking Care to Get You There!
Doug Aden, TC Chair Bill Sw enson, TC Vice- Chair Joe Jehn, CTE Chair Steve Parker, CTE Vice-Chair Greg McKnight Henry Sobanet Bill Kaufm an Tom W alsh Terry Schooler George Tem pel Kim Killin
5
Taking Care to Get You There!
6
State does not ow n or
Transit System s: Local Governm ent function
Taking Care to Get You There!
7
State does not ow n or
airports: Local Governm ent function Taking Care to Get You There!
Governor and Confirmed by Senate
8
Local governm ents receive 4 0 %
tax and are also funded by locally generated tax revenue Taking Care to Get You There!
9
meet ings
TPR
W orking together for a continuing, cooperative, and com prehensive transportation planning process per federal law MPO STAC Public Involvement County Hearing Process Elected Officials Meetings Transportation Commission Taking Care to Get You There!
and rural areas
15 TPR’ s advise CDOT
Metropolitan Planning Organizations
and meet several t imes a mont h Transportation Planning Region Statewide Transportation Advisory Committee
10
Revenue Forecasting Resource Allocation Annual Budget Long Range Plan STIP
Changes in revenue forecasts may impact the Long Range Plan, STIP, and/ or Budget
Taking Care to Get You There!
11
Major Projects
1 0 years Taking Care to Get You There!
12
Safety Mobility Program Delivery System Quality
Taking Care to Get You There!
13
Safety
Actual Annual Fatalities and Projected Annual Fatalities Colorado 1977 - 2005
1,493 1,583 1,648 1,786 606 667 641 628 626 681 741 743 1,548 1,632 1,655 1,740 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Year Number of Fatalities
So urce : BBC Research & Consulting from Colorado Department of Revenue, CDOT, Office of Transportation Safety, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Fatal Accident Reporting System (FARS).
Projected Fatalities If the 1977 Fatality Rate had Rem ained Constant Actual Fatalities
Mission of Mission of Traffic & Traffic & Safety: Safety: Reduce the Reduce the incidence incidence and severity and severity
vehicle vehicle crashes. crashes. Reduce the Reduce the hum an and hum an and econom ic econom ic loss loss associated associated w ith m otor w ith m otor vehicle vehicle crashes. crashes.
14
System Quality
15
System Quality
CDOT Bridges in Poor Category
111 118 124 117 115 106 111 88 108 115 108 108 107 177 $229 $311 $330 $298 $271 $295 $877 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 # of Bridges Actual Deck x 10,000 sq. ft. $ in Millions
Number of Poor Bridges Deck Area (x 10,000) Replacement Cost (in Millions)
Number of Poor Bridges 111 118 124 117 115 106 111 Deck Area (x 10,000) 88 108 115 108 108 107 177 Replacement Cost (in Millions) $229 $311 $330 $298 $271 $295 $877 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
16
(Reduction in projected daily delay/person in minutes)
Investment Level Objectives 65 60 54 43 22 30 38 46 54 62 70
Year
2030 No Investment $2.2B $3.6B $6.6B
2030 Mobility
Daily Delay / Person (Minutes)
17
Program Delivery
Traffic Operations Center Data Management Fleet Procurement Support Facilities located statewide Camp George West Maintenance Training Academy Community Outreach/ Planning Information Management System
18
0.0 200.0 400.0 600.0 800.0 1000.0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 fiscal year amounts in millions CDOT HUTF Federal SB 97-001 HB 02-1310 Other
19
10% in FY 2007. If Congress does not enact this increase, planned proj ects must be cut.
confusion in the proj ect prioritization discussions between CDOT and local governments.
Congress has not enacted FY 2007 Transportation
Appropriations Bill for the year that began October 1, 2006, $’ s flow only at the FY 2006 levels.
Authorized fed funding levels > than collections in fed gas taxes = draw ing dow n the fed HTF
bankrupt by 2 0 0 9 , m ay result in fed funding cuts betw een
to $ 2 5 0 M/ yr if Congress does not find solution
Federal Highw ay Trust Fund ( HTF) SAFETEA-LU
Jan 18 2007
Our nations’ capitol
20
W hile providing m uch needed dollars I n good econom ic years, this is not a reliable source to be counted on for planning
S.B. 97-001 Actuals and Forecasted Revenues
0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0 300.0 1 9 9 7 1 9 9 9 2 1 2 3 2 5 2 7 2 9 2 1 1 Actual OSPB Legislative Council
Legislative action can greatly reduce available funds
21
Uses for $290 million in ’ 06-’ 07 H.B. 02-1310 Funds
tate HUTF S hortfall
ervice Life of Zero (RS L 0) Proj ects
defined priorities
I f current
econom ic forecasts com e true, it w ill constitute the longest econom ic expansion in U.S. history.
H.B. 02-1310 Actual and Forecasted Revenues
0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0 300.0 1 9 9 7 1 9 9 9 2 1 2 3 2 5 2 7 2 9 2 1 1 Actual OSPB Legislative Council
Transportation system and needs are too im portant to bet on history breaking trends
22
Cities vs OTT Annual HUTF Distributions
85.0 90.0 95.0 100.0 105.0 110.0 115.0 120.0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 fiscal year amounts in millions Cities Off the Top
Overall grow th
Highw ay User’s Tax Fund ( HUTF) has rem ained stagnant w hile the Off-the-Top can grow at 6 % per year
23
As programs and priorities continue to tap into these funds, will there be available funds to address the impacts of Gaming on Colorado’ s highways?
garner financial participation to leverage state funds with local monies.
local money cannot be leveraged.
Per ( C.R.S. 1 2 -4 7 .1 -7 0 1 ) CDOT m ay request an appropriation from the Lim ited Gam ing Fund for highw ay needs in the vicinity of gam ing com m unities
24
25
26
Protect and Preserve Federal Funding Address HUTF “ Off-the-Top” Protect integrity of S
.B. 97-1
Continue 2/ 3 of H.B. 02-1310 funds flowing to transportation $14.3 Million Gaming Funds Decision Item FTE Cap Adopt Primary S
eat Belts
Explore new, stable funding sources for transportation
27
Colorado has experienced an alm ost doubling of traffic since 1 9 8 8 Added traffic stresses the system requiring m ore m aintenance and construction to keep the system in serviceable condition
28
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 $0 $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9 $10
Additional Level of Investment ($ in Millions) Additional Lives Saved
Without Primary Seat Belt Law
(.08 BAC Law , Engineering, Click It or Ticket, Leaf/YDYDYL)
With Primary Seat Belt Law
(.08 BAC Law , Engineering, Click It or Ticket, Leaf/YDYDYL)
29