california s s afer consumer products program a path to
play

California's S afer Consumer Products Program: A Path to Reducing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

California's S afer Consumer Products Program: A Path to Reducing Toxic Chemicals in Products A Report on the S CP Program to the DTS C Independent Review Panel Kathryn Alcantar, Director of CA Policy CEH & CHANGE Coalition Who We ARE


  1. California's S afer Consumer Products Program: A Path to Reducing Toxic Chemicals in Products A Report on the S CP Program to the DTS C Independent Review Panel Kathryn Alcantar, Director of CA Policy CEH & CHANGE Coalition

  2. Who We ARE  Asian and Pacific Islander Obesity Prevention Alliance  Forward Together  Bay Area Healthy 880 Communities  The Green Schools Initiative  Bayview Hunters Point Community Advocates  Green Science Policy Institute  Black Women for Wellness  Health Care Without Harm  Breast Cancer Action  Healthy Child Healthy World  Breast Cancer Fund  Healthy Children Organizing Project, Consumer Action  California Latinas for Reproductive Justice  Instituto de Educacion Popular del Sur de California  California Healthy Nail Salon Collaborative  Just Transition Alliance  California Pan-Ethnic Health Network  Making Our Milk Safe  Californians Against Waste  Movement Strategy Center  Californians for Pesticide Reform  Pesticide Action Network, North America  Center for Environmental Health  Physicians for Social Responsibility – Los Angeles  Center on Race, Poverty and the Environment  Clean Water Action  Science and Environmental Health Network  Coalition for Clean Air  Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition  Commonweal  So CA COSH  Communities for a Better Environment  United Steelworkers Local 675  East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice  Worksafe  Environment California  Women’s Voices for the Earth  Environmental Working Group

  3. Our Involvement in S CP Program  Development of Regulations  Engagement at GRS P meetings  Joint comments on  Proposed Priority Products  Workplan  Alternatives Assessment Guidance  Members attending/ providing comments at public workshops

  4. S ummary of Benefits and Challenges  References broad spectrum of authoritative lists  Underutilized authority for data call-in  Potential to stop chemical whack-a-  mole game Lack of fee authority results in lack of resources  S ends signals to industry about  changes needed- initiates research S electing too narrow chemicals in narrow categories (e.g. FRs) may feed  Authority to call-in data into toxic substitutions  Authority to address chemical  Delays undermine the intent of the classes, not j ust individual chemicals program  Responsive to needs of vulnerable  Collectively S CP has capacity, not communities and environmental currently being used, to have a much endpoints greater impact on public health  Progress on Alternatives Assessment Guidance  DTS C staff available and responsive

  5. S ynopsis of Comments on Priority Product: Children’s Foam S leeping Products  Great responsiveness to current chemical of concern  Vulnerable populations: Children  Narrow view of Chemicals of Concern  Narrow Categories of Products  Result in a missed opportunity to protect PH:  CPS C’s recent testing found halogenated FRs in 22% of kid’s products tested

  6. S ynopsis of Comments: MDI containing S PF S ystems  Important current issue with potential for widespread adverse impacts  S PF systems increasingly being used for energy efficiency  Vulnerable Populations:  Workers and Consumers  Buildings should be BOTH energy efficient and healthy  Great example of stimulating innovation

  7. Example of Petition: BP A in Canned Food/ Beverages

  8.  “ the program needs to focus on PPs S ummary with a significant public health impact, and that communities care about, and do so in a timely manner”   Program has great potential to “ the S CPs were very useful in our efforts to engage with AT&T to begin protect public health across a wide variety of chemicals in products a j oint union-company ‘ Green Team’ committee … to look at the materials  Identification of PPs can really spur catalogue the company had our innovation people using and find more benign alternatives where possible”  Agency isn’ t utilizing its full authority  “ unions and other groups of workers and workers advocates can be greatly  Program must speed up to actually empowered by the existence of the drive innovation S CPs in general and especially if the  S tate needs to ensure full funding product/ chemical is one that they and address regulatory barriers are using. Workers need the S CP program to continue and to expand  Lack of action is driving legislative [worker protections]” mandates and priorities  Given the extent of the problems with chemicals in consumer products, S CP has a duty to take on its full capacity to achieve the public health

Recommend


More recommend