budgeting for outcomes
play

Budgeting for Outcomes The Practical Application Benjamin Hart - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Budgeting for Outcomes The Practical Application Benjamin Hart Vice President, Assurance Services December 2, 2014 The webinar will begin at 10:00 a.m. CST Administration If you need CPE credit, please participate in all polls throughout the


  1. Budgeting for Outcomes The Practical Application Benjamin Hart Vice President, Assurance Services December 2, 2014 The webinar will begin at 10:00 a.m. CST

  2. Administration If you need CPE credit, please participate in all polls throughout the presentation.

  3. Administration A recording of today’s webinar will be emailed for your reference or to share with others.

  4. Administration For best quality, call in by phone instead of using your computer speakers.

  5. Administration To ask questions during the presentation, use the questions box on the right side of your screen.

  6. Administration Please provide your feedback at the end of today’s presentation.

  7. About the Speaker Benjamin Hart • Provides dual insights of a governmental CFO along with experience of governmental auditing for a public accounting firm • Brings extensive expertise in governmental budgeting, financial and internal controls, public sector leadership and more • Consistently earned the GFOA certificate for Excellence in Financial Reporting with his CAFRs

  8. Agenda High level overview Case studies

  9. Definition: Redesign or Wreck? “The usual, political way to handle a projected deficit is to take last year’s budget and cut. It is like taking last year’s family car and reducing its weight with a blowtorch and shears. But cutting $2 billion from this vehicle does not make it a compact; it makes it a wreck. What is wanted is a budget designed from the ground up.” Seattle Times editorial, Nov. 17, 2002 on Washington State’s use of a BFO process.

  10. Budget Definition “The budget process consists of activities that encompass the development, implementation, and evaluation of a plan for the provision of services and capital assets .”

  11. Budget Choices Are Guided By… Theory

  12. Budget Choices Are Guided By… Theory Hunch

  13. Budget Choices Are Guided By… Theory Hunch Politics

  14. Budget Choices Are Guided By… Theory Hunch Politics Self Interest

  15. Budget Choices Are Guided By… Theory Hunch Politics Self Interest Altruism

  16. History of Budget Development Traditional, or Line Item Budgeting

  17. History of Budget Development Traditional, or Line Item Budgeting Expenditure Control Budgeting

  18. History of Budget Development Traditional, or Line Item Zero Based Budgeting Budgeting Expenditure Control Budgeting

  19. History of Budget Development Traditional, or Line Item Zero Based Budgeting Budgeting Expenditure Program Control Budgeting Budgeting

  20. History of Budget Development Traditional, or Line Item Zero Based Performance Budgeting Budgeting Budgeting Expenditure Program Control budgeting Budgeting

  21. History of Budget Development Traditional, or Line Item Zero-Based Performance Budgeting Budgeting budgeting Expenditure Program Priorities - Control budgeting Budgeting for Budgeting Outcomes

  22. Budget Approaches Incremental Line Item Budgeting Budget based on the object of the expenditure and inputs Expenditure Control Budgeting Control carry-forwards and focus only on “new” requests

  23. Budget Approaches Cost-based Zero-Based Budgeting Meant to improve on incremental budgeting. Establish a base of zero and reauthorize expenditures annually. Program Budget Develop organization-wide goals and design a budget around those priorities.

  24. Budget Approaches Strategic Performance Budget Focuses on goals, objectives, evidence and results Priority Budget Focused on aligning programs to community preferences and needs

  25. Polling Question

  26. Budget Evaluation Efficiency Equity BUDGET Effectiveness Economy

  27. BFO Changes the Game: Questions That Matter/Evaluation Criteria Maximizing the inputs related Efficiency to outputs gained.

  28. BFO Changes the Game: Questions That Matter/Evaluation Criteria What results matter most to our citizens – what are the Equity priorities of government we will deliver to citizens?

  29. BFO Changes the Game: Questions That Matter/Evaluation Criteria How much should we spend Economy to achieve each result ?

  30. BFO Changes the Game: Questions That Matter/Evaluation Criteria How can we BEST deliver the Effectiveness results that citizens expect?

  31. Government Challenges to Innovation Inertia

  32. Government Challenges to Innovation Negative publicity

  33. Government Challenges to Innovation Lack of investment

  34. Government Challenges to Innovation Status quo beneficiaries

  35. Government Challenges to Innovation Private sector tool

  36. Polling Question

  37. The BFO Process Establish the price of government

  38. The BFO Process Choose the Create Invite priorities of the requests offers from government for results sellers Invite offers from sellers

  39. The BFO Process Decide Present Rank the offers what to the budget buy

  40. Applying the Practices Adjust as Stakeholder necessary input Monitor Long-term results goals Adopt Short-term budget goals Operating Direction & budget to staff impacts

  41. Organizing BFO Teams/Roles Mayor / City City Council Manager Communications Results Team Team

  42. Organizing BFO Teams/Roles Sets price of government Decides citizen priorities City Council Provides comments on Requests for Offers Conducts budget discussions based on what works to achieve priorities Makes final budget decisions Supports the process

  43. Organizing BFO Teams/Roles Champions the process and assigns staff to carry it out Mayor / City Manager Approves Requests for Offers Proposes a budget to elected body based on rankings Trusts the process and uses results in proposed budget Keeps electeds advised

  44. Organizing BFO Teams/Roles Focus on external and internal communications Communications Organizes talking points Team Rumor control

  45. Organizing BFO Teams/Roles Team for each priority Composition varies Results Team Pick your “best and brightest” Adding members outside the organization is helpful Wear a “citizen’s hat”

  46. Variations for Very Small Communities City Council can serve as Results Team. Can use only one Results Team to prepare Requests for Offers for all results Can work together with other communities to combine resources

  47. Case Study Case Study City of Olathe, KS

  48. Challenges Aging Changing Tax Infrastructure Needs Dependency Public Organizational Engagement Buy-In

  49. Applying the Practices Adjust as Stakeholder necessary input Monitor Long-term results goals Adopt Short-term budget goals Operating Direction & budget to staff impacts

  50. The strategic priorities are cascaded down through the organization Top-down The articulation measurement results are Bottom-up rolled back up execution

  51. Community Comprehensive Strategic Plan Plan Vision / Mission STRATEGIC CYCLE Organizational Scorecard

  52. Community Comprehensive Strategic Plan Plan Vision / Mission STRATEGIC CYCLE Organizational Scorecard Performance metrics Stakeholder input

  53. Community Comprehensive Strategic Plan Plan Vision / Mission STRATEGIC CYCLE Organizational Scorecard Department Scorecards (Business Plans) Performance metrics Department Objectives Stakeholder input Department Initiatives Measures & Targets

  54. Community Comprehensive Strategic Plan Plan Vision / Mission STRATEGIC CYCLE Organizational Scorecard Department Scorecards (Business Plans) Performance metrics Program Department Objectives Stakeholder input Scorecards Department Initiatives Measures & Targets

  55. Community Comprehensive Strategic Plan Plan Vision / Mission STRATEGIC CYCLE Organizational Scorecard Department Scorecards (Business Plans) Performance metrics Program Department Objectives Stakeholder input Scorecards Department Initiatives Measures & Targets Employee Scorecards

  56. Community Comprehensive Strategic Plan Plan Vision / Mission STRATEGIC CYCLE Organizational Scorecard Department Scorecards (Business Plans) Performance metrics Program Department Objectives Stakeholder input Scorecards Department Initiatives Measures & Targets Employee Scorecards Resource Allocation

  57. Budgeted dgeted In Initiatives itiatives Annual Budget Strategy Cost Measures 1 FTE Fingerprinting completed on 100% of all cases Addition of Bailiff $62,695 required by state statutes Addition of Detective 1 FTE Increase the number of Part 1 cases cleared by $70,296 50 Addition of Firefighter/Paramedics 2 FTEs 3.5% of Total Medical Calls Responded to by the $139,257 Squad Assume full funding for Mental $42,900 Reduce calls from repeat users to 12% or less Health Co-Responder Contract Reduce the per-prosecutor caseload by 10%, .5 FTE Addition of Part-Time Prosecutor $47,020 creating greater efficiency and effectiveness in case management

  58. Case Study Case Study City of Gardner, KS

  59. Challenges Create Opportunity Overlapping Backlog of Growth Debt Projects Preparation Refocus on Open for Development Business

Recommend


More recommend