Brighthouse Financial, Inc.
Note regarding forward-looking statements This presentation contains information that includes or is based upon forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Federal Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements give expectations or forecasts of future events. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They use words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe” and other words and terms of similar meaning, or are tied to future periods, in connection with a discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these include statements relating to future actions, statements regarding the separation and distribution, including the timing and expected benefits thereof, the formation of Brighthouse and the recapitalization actions, including receiving required regulatory approvals and the timing and expected benefits thereof, future performance or results of current and anticipated services or products, sales efforts, expenses, the outcome of contingencies such as legal proceedings, trends in operations and financial results. Any or all forward-looking statements may turn out to be wrong. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Many such factors will be important in determining the actual future results of Brighthouse, its subsidiaries and affiliates. These statements are based on current expectations and the current economic environment. They involve a number of risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. These statements are not guarantees of future performance. Actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors. Although it is not possible to identify all of these risks and factors, they include, among others: risks relating to the formation of Brighthouse and our recapitalization; the timing of the separation and the distribution, whether the conditions to the distribution will be met, whether the separation and the distribution will be completed, and whether the distribution will qualify for non-recognition treatment for U.S. federal income tax purposes and potential indemnification to MetLife if the distribution does not so qualify; the impact of the separation on our business and profitability due to MetLife’s strong brand and reputation, the increased costs related to replacing arrangements with MetLife with those of third- parties and incremental costs as a public company; whether the operational, strategic and other benefits of the separation can be achieved, and our ability to implement our business strategy; our degree of leverage following the separation due to indebtedness incurred in connection with the separation; differences between actual experience and actuarial assumptions and the effectiveness of our actuarial models; higher risk management costs and exposure to increased counterparty risk due to guarantees within certain of our products; the effectiveness of our proposed exposure management strategy, and the timing of its implementation and the impact of such strategy on net income volatility and negative effects on our statutory capital; the additional reserves we will be required to hold against our variable annuities as a result of actuarial guidelines; a sustained period of low equity market prices and interest rates that are lower than those we assumed when we issued our variable annuity products; the effect adverse capital and credit market conditions may have on our ability to meet liquidity needs and our access to capital; the impact of regulatory, legislative or tax changes on our insurance business or other operations; the effectiveness of our risk management policies and procedures; the availability of reinsurance and the ability of our counterparties to our reinsurance or indemnification arrangements to perform their obligations thereunder; heightened competition, including with respect to service, product features, scale, price, actual or perceived financial strength, claims-paying ratings, credit ratings, e-business capabilities and name recognition; changes in accounting standards, practices and/or policies applicable to us; the ability of our insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends to us, and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders; our ability to market and distribute our products through distribution channels; and our ability to attract and retain key personnel. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as otherwise may be required by law. Please consult any further disclosures Brighthouse Financial, Inc. makes on related subjects in amendments to its registration statement on Form 10 and subsequent reports to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Non-GAAP financial information This presentation also contains measures that are not calculated based on accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, also known as GAAP. Additional discussion of non-GAAP financial information is included in the Appendix to these slides. 2
Key members of senior management Eric Steigerwalt Pete Carlson Anant Bhalla John Rosenthal Chief Executive Officer Chief Operating Officer Chief Financial Officer Chief Investment Officer 31 years experience 30 years experience 17 years experience 33 years experience Select Experience Select Experience Select Experience Select Experience • Head of MetLife U.S. • CFO of MetLife U.S. • Senior Managing • Chief Accounting Retail from 2012 to Retail from 2014 to Director and Head of Officer of MetLife from 2016 2016 Global Portfolio 2009 to 2017 Management of • CFO of MetLife U.S. • CRO of AIG Global • Deputy Controller of MetLife from 2011 to from 2009 to 2011 Consumer from 2012 Wells Fargo in 2009 2016 to 2014 • Treasurer of MetLife • Controller of Wachovia • Head of Core from 2007 to 2009 • Treasurer and CRO of from 2006 to 2008 Securities of MetLife Lincoln from 2009 to from 2004 to 2011 • Senior level accounting 2011 • Co-Head of Fixed & finance roles at – Similar capacity at Income & Equity of Wachovia from 2002 to Ameriprise, MetLife from 2006 including leading 2000 to 2004 spin-off from AXP • Certified Public Accountant 3
Brighthouse: A large insurance business with a well established retail platform Major industry player with large in-force book of business providing 1 immediate scale Separation creates a more focused, nimble U.S. Retail franchise that can 2 favorably adapt to market dynamics Strong capital base and financial flexibility 3 Robust risk management framework focused on protecting statutory capital 4 Cash flow approach to managing in-force Variable Annuity exposure 5 4
Brighthouse is one of the largest U.S. life insurance 1 companies Select U.S. insurance companies by assets ($B) 1 Select BHF metrics MetLife $696 3 $915 $11.2B 4 $797 Prudential Shareholders’ net investment $500 AIG (ex. AOCI) New York Life 2 $318 $267 Lincoln 4 $219B 2 $251 State Farm Group 2 Northwestern Mutual $251 Total assets $235 Principal $230 John Hancock $195B Hartford $225 $224 Mass Mutual Total AUM $219 4 VOYA $217 2.8M 2 $216 Jackson 2 $205 Nationwide Mutual Policies and contracts in-force Aflac $134 Note: Company filings, data as of 3/31/2017 unless otherwise noted 1. Source: Company filings, SNL financial 2. As of 12/31/2016 3. MetLife excluding BHF has $696B in assets 4. Pro forma for transactions associated with the separation of BHF including the unwinding of financings, completed and prospective financing transactions, reinsurance 5 recapture transactions, legal entity adjustments and assumed cash distributions to MetLife
Diverse in-force book and policyholder base to drive 1 relevance, scale and growth ~$195B assets under management 1 Variable annuities • GMIB, GMWB, GMAB, GMDB – Ceased new GMIB in February 2016 61% 6% Life • Term, Whole, UL and VUL 19% 14% Run-off • Includes ULSG Fixed & index-linked annuities • Fixed, income, index-linked annuities 1. As of 3/31/2017; includes $3.7B of assets under management from Corporate & Other; assets under management defined as sum of general account investments and 6 separate account assets
Significant fee-based revenues 1 Operating revenues Fee income ($B) ¹ $4.3 $4.3 $4.1 Annuities 55% Life 14% Run-off 26% Corporate & other 5% ~$9.0B operating revenues for 2016 2014 2015 2016 ¹ Includes approximately $0.3B higher fee income related to recaptures of single premium deferred annuity blocks in 2016 7
Brighthouse – a more focused, nimble U.S. retail franchise 2 • Focused on target market segments • Simpler product suite focused on generating statutory cash flow • Independent and diverse distribution network • Emphasis on operating cost and flexibility 8
Recommend
More recommend
