branching laws for non generic representations
play

Branching laws for non-generic representations Max Gurevich - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Restriction Problem Categorical equivalences On unique irreducible quotients Branching laws for non-generic representations Max Gurevich National University of Singapore June 2018, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC Max Gurevich


  1. Restriction Problem Categorical equivalences On unique irreducible quotients Branching laws for non-generic representations Max Gurevich National University of Singapore June 2018, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC Max Gurevich Branching laws for non-generic representations

  2. Branching Restriction Problem Tools (following Bernstein-Zelevinski) Categorical equivalences GGP conjectures On unique irreducible quotients Results Difficulties Main Problem F - a p -adic field. π - irreducible smooth representation of GL n p F q . How does π | GL n ´ 1 p F q decompose? What are the irreducible quotients of π | GL n ´ 1 p F q ? It is long-known (Jacquet - Piatetski-Shapiro - Shalika) that Hom p π 1 | GL n ´ 1 p F q , π 2 q ‰ 0 , for all generic irreducible π 1 , π 2 . Goal: What can be said about the non-generic case?One would like to describe the pairs p π 1 , π 2 q for which the Hom space above is non-zero. Max Gurevich Branching laws for non-generic representations

  3. Branching Restriction Problem Tools (following Bernstein-Zelevinski) Categorical equivalences GGP conjectures On unique irreducible quotients Results Difficulties Main Problem F - a p -adic field. π - irreducible smooth representation of GL n p F q . How does π | GL n ´ 1 p F q decompose? What are the irreducible quotients of π | GL n ´ 1 p F q ? It is long-known (Jacquet - Piatetski-Shapiro - Shalika) that Hom p π 1 | GL n ´ 1 p F q , π 2 q ‰ 0 , for all generic irreducible π 1 , π 2 . Goal: What can be said about the non-generic case?One would like to describe the pairs p π 1 , π 2 q for which the Hom space above is non-zero. Max Gurevich Branching laws for non-generic representations

  4. Branching Restriction Problem Tools (following Bernstein-Zelevinski) Categorical equivalences GGP conjectures On unique irreducible quotients Results Difficulties Main Problem F - a p -adic field. π - irreducible smooth representation of GL n p F q . How does π | GL n ´ 1 p F q decompose? What are the irreducible quotients of π | GL n ´ 1 p F q ? It is long-known (Jacquet - Piatetski-Shapiro - Shalika) that Hom p π 1 | GL n ´ 1 p F q , π 2 q ‰ 0 , for all generic irreducible π 1 , π 2 . Goal: What can be said about the non-generic case?One would like to describe the pairs p π 1 , π 2 q for which the Hom space above is non-zero. Max Gurevich Branching laws for non-generic representations

  5. Branching Restriction Problem Tools (following Bernstein-Zelevinski) Categorical equivalences GGP conjectures On unique irreducible quotients Results Difficulties Main Problem F - a p -adic field. π - irreducible smooth representation of GL n p F q . How does π | GL n ´ 1 p F q decompose? What are the irreducible quotients of π | GL n ´ 1 p F q ? It is long-known (Jacquet - Piatetski-Shapiro - Shalika) that Hom p π 1 | GL n ´ 1 p F q , π 2 q ‰ 0 , for all generic irreducible π 1 , π 2 . Goal: What can be said about the non-generic case?One would like to describe the pairs p π 1 , π 2 q for which the Hom space above is non-zero. Max Gurevich Branching laws for non-generic representations

  6. Branching Restriction Problem Tools (following Bernstein-Zelevinski) Categorical equivalences GGP conjectures On unique irreducible quotients Results Difficulties Main Problem F - a p -adic field. π - irreducible smooth representation of GL n p F q . How does π | GL n ´ 1 p F q decompose? What are the irreducible quotients of π | GL n ´ 1 p F q ? It is long-known (Jacquet - Piatetski-Shapiro - Shalika) that Hom p π 1 | GL n ´ 1 p F q , π 2 q ‰ 0 , for all generic irreducible π 1 , π 2 . Goal: What can be said about the non-generic case?One would like to describe the pairs p π 1 , π 2 q for which the Hom space above is non-zero. Max Gurevich Branching laws for non-generic representations

  7. Branching Restriction Problem Tools (following Bernstein-Zelevinski) Categorical equivalences GGP conjectures On unique irreducible quotients Results Difficulties Main Problem F - a p -adic field. π - irreducible smooth representation of GL n p F q . How does π | GL n ´ 1 p F q decompose? What are the irreducible quotients of π | GL n ´ 1 p F q ? It is long-known (Jacquet - Piatetski-Shapiro - Shalika) that Hom p π 1 | GL n ´ 1 p F q , π 2 q ‰ 0 , for all generic irreducible π 1 , π 2 . Goal: What can be said about the non-generic case?One would like to describe the pairs p π 1 , π 2 q for which the Hom space above is non-zero. Max Gurevich Branching laws for non-generic representations

  8. Branching Restriction Problem Tools (following Bernstein-Zelevinski) Categorical equivalences GGP conjectures On unique irreducible quotients Results Difficulties Tools: Parabolic induction Representations of t GL n p F qu n have an intriguing product structure. Given π 1 P Rep GL n 1 p F q and π 2 P Rep GL n 2 p F q , we can think of π 1 b π 2 as a representation of the parabolic subgroup ˆ GL n 1 p F q ˚ ˙ P “ ă GL n 1 ` n 2 p F q . 0 GL n 2 p F q GL n 1 ` n 2 p F q π 1 ˆ π 2 : “ ind p π 1 b π 2 q P Rep GL n 1 ` n 2 p F q P Max Gurevich Branching laws for non-generic representations

  9. Branching Restriction Problem Tools (following Bernstein-Zelevinski) Categorical equivalences GGP conjectures On unique irreducible quotients Results Difficulties Tools: Parabolic induction Representations of t GL n p F qu n have an intriguing product structure. Given π 1 P Rep GL n 1 p F q and π 2 P Rep GL n 2 p F q , we can think of π 1 b π 2 as a representation of the parabolic subgroup ˆ GL n 1 p F q ˚ ˙ P “ ă GL n 1 ` n 2 p F q . 0 GL n 2 p F q GL n 1 ` n 2 p F q π 1 ˆ π 2 : “ ind p π 1 b π 2 q P Rep GL n 1 ` n 2 p F q P Max Gurevich Branching laws for non-generic representations

  10. Branching Restriction Problem Tools (following Bernstein-Zelevinski) Categorical equivalences GGP conjectures On unique irreducible quotients Results Difficulties Tools: Parabolic induction Representations of t GL n p F qu n have an intriguing product structure. Given π 1 P Rep GL n 1 p F q and π 2 P Rep GL n 2 p F q , we can think of π 1 b π 2 as a representation of the parabolic subgroup ˆ GL n 1 p F q ˚ ˙ P “ ă GL n 1 ` n 2 p F q . 0 GL n 2 p F q GL n 1 ` n 2 p F q π 1 ˆ π 2 : “ ind p π 1 b π 2 q P Rep GL n 1 ` n 2 p F q P Max Gurevich Branching laws for non-generic representations

  11. Branching Restriction Problem Tools (following Bernstein-Zelevinski) Categorical equivalences GGP conjectures On unique irreducible quotients Results Difficulties Tools: Derivatives For every 0 ď i ď n , there are well-defined functors Rep GL n p F q Ñ Rep GL n ´ i p F q π p i q ÞÑ π p i q π ÞÑ π called left and right Bernstein-Zelevinski derivatives. Derivatives of an irreducible representation are objects of finite length. Max Gurevich Branching laws for non-generic representations

  12. Branching Restriction Problem Tools (following Bernstein-Zelevinski) Categorical equivalences GGP conjectures On unique irreducible quotients Results Difficulties Tools: Derivatives For every 0 ď i ď n , there are well-defined functors Rep GL n p F q Ñ Rep GL n ´ i p F q π p i q ÞÑ π p i q π ÞÑ π called left and right Bernstein-Zelevinski derivatives. Derivatives of an irreducible representation are objects of finite length. Max Gurevich Branching laws for non-generic representations

  13. Branching Restriction Problem Tools (following Bernstein-Zelevinski) Categorical equivalences GGP conjectures On unique irreducible quotients Results Difficulties Filtration π P Irr GL n p F q Classical results of Bernstein-Zelevinski give a filtration of the GL n ´ 1 p F q -representation p π | GL n ´ 1 p F q , U q t 0 u “ U n ` 1 Ă U n Ă ¨ ¨ ¨ Ă U 1 “ U , so that each U i { U i ` 1 is well understood. Max Gurevich Branching laws for non-generic representations

  14. Branching Restriction Problem Tools (following Bernstein-Zelevinski) Categorical equivalences GGP conjectures On unique irreducible quotients Results Difficulties A question about morphisms Hom p π 1 | GL n ´ 1 p F q , π 2 q ‰ 0 ù ñ Hom p U i { U i ` 1 , π 2 q ‰ 0 , for some i . From an application of Frobenius reciprocity (a certain adjunction of functors), we can rewrite the above Hom space in another form and obtain: ´ ¯ | det | 1 { 2 b π p i q 1 , p i ´ 1 q π 2 Hom GL n ´ i p F q ‰ 0 . F Now, we are asking about Hom spaces of finite-length representations! Max Gurevich Branching laws for non-generic representations

  15. Branching Restriction Problem Tools (following Bernstein-Zelevinski) Categorical equivalences GGP conjectures On unique irreducible quotients Results Difficulties A question about morphisms Hom p π 1 | GL n ´ 1 p F q , π 2 q ‰ 0 ù ñ Hom p U i { U i ` 1 , π 2 q ‰ 0 , for some i . From an application of Frobenius reciprocity (a certain adjunction of functors), we can rewrite the above Hom space in another form and obtain: ´ ¯ | det | 1 { 2 b π p i q 1 , p i ´ 1 q π 2 Hom GL n ´ i p F q ‰ 0 . F Now, we are asking about Hom spaces of finite-length representations! Max Gurevich Branching laws for non-generic representations

Recommend


More recommend