brackish water in nm
play

BRACKISH WATER IN NM BARRIERS AND SOLUTIONS E.J. SULLIVAN GRAHAM - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

BRACKISH WATER IN NM BARRIERS AND SOLUTIONS E.J. SULLIVAN GRAHAM UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO-CENTER FOR WATER AND THE ENVIRONMENT NMWRRI ANNUAL CONFERENCE, SOCORRO, NM AUGUST 16, 2017 SOME HISTORY OF BRACKISH WATER STUDIES NATIONAL STUDY


  1. BRACKISH WATER IN NM BARRIERS AND SOLUTIONS E.J. SULLIVAN GRAHAM UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO-CENTER FOR WATER AND THE ENVIRONMENT NMWRRI ANNUAL CONFERENCE, SOCORRO, NM AUGUST 16, 2017

  2. SOME HISTORY OF BRACKISH WATER STUDIES • NATIONAL STUDY (FETH) DONE IN 1965 (INCLUDING “THE MAP”!) • 1990’S CLASSIC PAPER BY R. HUFF • 1970’S-2000’S WORK: MANY RESEARCHERS-BUREAU OF GEOLOGY, USGS, AND OTHERS (E.G KELLLY, 1970 AND 1974) • NEW MEXICO BRACKISH GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT PROGRAM WORKSHOP IN 2004 (NMBG AND AFFILIATES) • BW WORKING GROUP COORDINATED STUDIES IN 2016 (NMBG WITH EPA/NMED FUNDING) • CURRENT (JUST STARTED) STUDY (NMWRRI) – CENTRAL RIO GRANDE BASIN (OPEN) • USGS NATIONAL BRACKISH WATER SURVEY 2017-FIRST NEW NATIONAL STUDY SINCE FETH!

  3. NM WORKING GROUP 2013-2016 • WIDE VARIETY OF PARTICIPANTS – ACADEMIC, RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS, CONSULTANTS • SERIES OF MEETINGS TO DEVELOP PRIORITIES • SET OF PRIORITIES PRESENTED TO STATE AGENCIES DEC. 2015 • SOME FUNDING RECEIVED IN 2015 TO DO SHORT TERM STUDIES ON SELECT BW LOCALES AND PRODUCED WATER • WRAPPED UP 2016 DUE TO AGENCY LEADERSHIP CHANGES • LACK OF FUNDING WAS A MAJOR STUMBLING BLOCK. SENSE WAS THAT WE KNEW WHAT/WHERE TO LOOK, BUT FUNDING WAS NEEDED FOR MORE DATA, AND POLICY DIRECTION WAS NEEDED FROM STATE LEVEL AGENCIES.

  4. BARRIERS AND POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS • EXTEND FUNDED STUDIES TO INCLUDE ”VALUE-ADDED” DATA COLLECTION • NOT ENOUGH SPATIAL DATA • KEEP REVISITING LOCALES OF INTEREST OVER TIME (DEPTH+SALINITY) • SLOW STATE GROWTH HAS DE-PRIORITIZED BRACKISH WATER DEVELOPMENT. LONG-TERM THINKING AND • NOT ENOUGH TEMPORAL DATA POLICIES ARE NEEDED. (SALINITY+VOLUMES / TIME) • EXPAND WAYS TO STORE WATER LONG TERM- SUBSURFACE STORAGE. WATER SWAPS? • THE PARADOX OF DROUGHT • CLOSED BASINS NEED RISK-REWARD ANALYSIS • CLOSED VS OPEN BASINS • OPEN BASINS CAN BE PRIORITIZED FOR DEVELOPMENT • MINING AND DRAWDOWN EFFECTS • MINING EVALUATIONS NEEDED-HYDROLOGIC STUDIES TO EVALUATE INCREASED PUMPING COST EFFECTS WITH DRAWDOWN. RISK-REWARD ANALYSIS.

  5. BARRIERS AND POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS PORTABLE EQUIPMENT; FLEXIBLE INFRASTRUCTURE DEPLOYMENT • (LEARN FROM OIL AND GAS); REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY • INTERMITTENT NEEDS VS PERMANENT ”LOW AND SLOW” TREATMENT PRIORITIZED (LOW VOLUME, • SLOW FLOW RATES, LONG TIMES-UTILIZE LOW-ENERGY USE INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT METHODS) • COSTS TO TREAT DISPOSAL FLEXIBILITY-UTILIZE OIL AND GAS INFRASTRUCTURE • PER TEXAS MODEL? CHEAPER DISPOSAL WELL SPECIFICATIONS? • WASTE DISPOSAL CHALLENGES STATE ENGINEER COULD PUBLISH SCENARIO ANALYSIS FOR • • OWNERSHIP AND WATER RIGHTS CLARITY COMMUNITIES, INDUSTRY NMED COULD EVALUATE EXPECTED SCENARIOS FOR • • LOW FUNDING PRIORITY COMMUNITES TO USE AS MODELS KEEP UP PRESSURE ON STATE, FEDERAL, OTHER SOURCES AS A • PRIORITY AND VALUE-ADD

Recommend


More recommend