Board of Education Budget 2019-2020 March 20, 2019
Teach & Learn Our Mission with Continues ... Passion & Purpose 3
4 Board of Education Goals ● Narrow the achievement gap ● Provide a safe learning environment ● Hire a highly qualified and diverse staff ● Secure necessary funding through public and community partnerships
Bristol’s Vision of the Graduate 5
6 District Priorities Inspire and Cultivate Talent Ensure that all students learn in a community of highly committed, dynamic and passionate individuals. Organizational and Operational Effectiveness Improve central office and building systems, organizational structures and services to foster a safe and positive learning environment, and utilize resources most efficiently.
7 District Priorities Community Engagement and Partnerships Expand and increase community partnerships that meet in and out of school needs of students and families in order to improve student outcomes. Learner-Focused Put students at the center of their learning to guarantee they have the knowledge, skills, voice and social emotional skills to be successful in post secondary learning, career, and life.
8 BPS Scholars and Future Graduates Enrolled Students: 8,127 +324 (magnet) = 8,451 students PK-12 Demographic Data: 55.7% White 29.3% Hispanic 7.1% African American 3.6% Asian 4.0% 2 or more races Students with Disabilities: 20% Eligibility for free/reduced lunch: 52% (7 universal free) English Language Learners: 404
Graduating Class of 2018 Graduates: 532 College/Post Secondary Training: 84.0% Workforce: 14.3% Military: 1.7%
Bristol students are accepted to top 100 ranked universities and liberal arts colleges.
Bristol Graduates are accepted at top US Universities American University McGill University (Canada) U S Air Force Academy Amherst College New York University University of Arizona Arizona State University North Carolina State University of California, Davis Boston College Northeastern University Univ. of California, LA Boston University Northwestern University University of Chicago Clark University Ohio State University University of Connecticut Clarkson University Pennsylvania State University University of Delaware Colorado School of Mines Princeton University University of Denver Columbia University Purdue University University of Florida Connecticut College Quinnipiac University University of Georgia Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst.
The acceptances continue ... Cornell University Rochester Inst of Technology Univ. Massachusetts, Amherst Culinary Institute of America Rutgers University University of Michigan Dartmouth College Sarah Lawrence College Univ. of North Carolina Chapel Hill Duke University St. John's University University of Pennsylvania Emory University Stanford University University of Pittsburgh Fordham University Stony Brook University University of Vermont Georgia Inst. of Technology Syracuse University University of Washington Harvard University Temple University Virginia Tech Howard University The Citadel Wesleyan University Marist College Trinity College Worcester Polytechnic Institute MIT Yale University
13 Ensuring Academic Achievement for ALL
District Performance Index Measures of Growth and Performance in and for high needs and non-high needs students. Bristol has approximately 60% high needs students inclusive of economically disadvantaged, students w/disabilities & English learners. English/language arts State Avg Exceeded for high needs students ❖ Mathematics State Avg Exceeded for high needs students ❖ Chronic Absenteeism Better than State Avg for ALL & HN students ❖ College & Career Readiness Courses Growth needed ❖ Access to Arts Courses Exceeded for ALL students ❖ Physical Fitness Exceeded for ALL students ❖ On track for graduation in 4 years Exceeded for ALL students ❖ Measured in % of the state target achieved: CT: 74.9% BRISTOL: 75.3%
Why Growth Matters “To the extent that information about school quality influences middle-class families’ decisions about where to live, data on growth rates might provide very different signals,” he said. “ You might find parents ranking communities differently if they weren’t relying on average test scores, which are highly correlated with socioeconomic background. ” quoted from https://news.stanford.edu/2017/12/05/students-early-test-scores-not-predict-academic-growth-time/
Bristol Plymouth Plainville Southington Region 10 Farmington CREC # of 2853 556 842 2434 906 1573 3463 students 1779 HN (62%) 305 HN (54%) 477 HN (56%) 928 HN (38%) 227 HN (25%) 502 HN (31%) 2070 HN 60%) Growth % Avg. Growth % Avg. Growth % Avg. Growth % Avg. Growth % Avg. Growth % Avg. Growth % Avg. Rate Target Rate Target Rate Target Rate Target Rate Target Rate Target Rate Target Achieved Achieved Achieved Achieved Achieved Achieved Achieved ELA 38 60.4 29.1 48 45.5 65.4 38.4 58.9 47.2 65.7 55.3 72 39 58.8 All students ELA 34.4 58.4 32.3 47 43.6 63.9 31.1 52 36.4 58.4 42.6 63.8 35.7 56 High Need students Math 39.3 59.3 39.9 59 54.5 75.1 35.3 56.3 42.4 62.5 56.4 74 32.7 52.4 All students Math 36.8 57.4 38.5 58.3 48.7 70.0 29.1 50 32 64.3 38.8 59.9 29.5 49.2 High Need students
17 Impact of Coaching and Collaboration English Language Arts Mathematics
18 Multi-tiered System of Academic Supports: 8 schools 4 schools 2 schools Elementary Schools Middle and 6-8 at K-8 High School 3368 1938 2306 Local/ Federal Funding Local/ Federal Funding State (Title I) State (Title I) 4 schools 1 school Literacy Coach Tier One 8 3 Math Coach 3 1 Tier Two Literacy Intern 9 Math Intern 2 1 Tier Three Literacy 10 1.5 Interventionist Math 2 interventionist
Next Generation Accountability-CCR Enrollment
Next Generation Accountability-CCR Achievement
College Board Advanced Placement Enrollment
College Board Advanced Placement Achievement
23 # of AP Total FRL Testers District Equity Courses Testers as % of FRL% Gap with FRL Total Test Tested Takers Bristol 21 504 59.5% 44.4% 15.1% State of CT 14.0% 36.7% -22.7% CREC 20 450 38.4% 51.7% -13.3% Farmington 15 445 6.1% 10.9% -4.9% Plainville 5 87 12.6% 24.7% -12.0% Plymouth 7 93 21.5% 32.7% -11.2% Region 10 n/a 176 n/a 6.2% n/a Southington n/a 355 n/a 15.7% n/a
https://ytcropper.com/cropped/C15c8fa5094062a
27 Provide a safe & supportive learning environment
29 Priority Actions: Safe and Supportive Learning Environment ○ District and School-based Crisis Teams ○ BPS Emergency Preparedness Manual ○ Director of Safety & Security ■ Consistency in emergency planning, uniform response and SWOT analysis ○ Raptor Visitor System ■ Coordinated Efforts to Ensure Campus Safety
30 Priority Actions: Safe and Supportive Learning Environment ○ Safe School Climate Policy ○ District and School-based Climate Teams ○ School Climate and Culture Expectations and Guidelines ○ CREW Training and implementation PK-5 ○ Trauma-informed training in grades PK-12 ○ SBDI Pilot at Bristol Eastern and BPREP
Multi-tiered Behavioral Support Systems: 31 8 schools 4 schools 2 schools Elementary Schools Middle and 6-8 at K-8 High School 3368 1938 2306 Local/ Federal Funding Local/ Federal Funding Local/State State (Title I) State (Title I) 4 schools 1 school Tier Roles primarily Social, 2 3 3 4 One intended to proactively Emotional, SUPPORT and Behavioral RESPOND immediately Support Interns to students’ social, emotional, and 3 Behavior behavioral needs Interventionist 5 1 Tier Roles primarily Social Two intended to TEACH Emotional 1:135 1:47 students’ social, Learning emotional, and Coordinator behavioral skills 7 10 School Counselor 1:230 2 2 Tier Roles primarily BCBA Three intended to RESPOND and TEACH skills targeted to specific learning needs as 8 5 3 School identified in 504, IEP, Psychologist and Tier III SRBI.
Hire a qualified and diverse staff
33 ● One of the first districts in the Troops to Teachers Program ● Member of the Minority Teacher Recruitment Oversight Council-Informs the Dept. of Ed. Commissioner ● Member CREC Minority Recruitment Consortium ● Over 120 in-person teacher recruiting contacts in 2018 to hire the best and brightest candidates
Staff Counts Employee Type General Grant/Other Total FTE FTE Fund FTE Administrators 37.1 2.90 40.00 Supervisors 2.83 0.17 3.00 Teachers 560.98 63.75 624.73 Secretaries 68.13 2.70 70.83 ParaEducators 160.04 26.00 186.04 Information Technology 7.00 0 7.00 Custodian/Maint 68.00 0 68.00 Non-Bargaining 22.92 12.68 35.60 Food Services 0 57.00 57.00 TOTALS: 919 165.2 1092.20
Staff Comparison Student Students Admin. Ratio Teachers Ratio Count WD % 7997 17.9% 40.0 200:1 624.73 13:1 Bristol CREC 8654 n/a 68.5 125:1 889.7 10:1 East Hartford 6868 16.3% 49 140:1 607.1 11:1 Meriden 7933 18.5% 52 153:1 628.8 13:1 Southington 6500 13.6% 36.7 177:1 556.8 12:1 Wallingford 5863 14.2% 31.6 186:1 581.8 10:1 9738 12.5% 59.2 164:1 882.2 11:1 West Hartford
Recommend
More recommend
