bankruptcy litigation strategies for secured lenders and
play

Bankruptcy Litigation Strategies for Secured Lenders and Other - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presents presents Bankruptcy Litigation Strategies for Secured Lenders and Other Creditors Minimizing Risks of Fraudulent Conveyance, Preference Challenges and Avoidance Actions A Live 90-Minute Teleconference/Webinar with Interactive Q&A


  1. presents presents Bankruptcy Litigation Strategies for Secured Lenders and Other Creditors Minimizing Risks of Fraudulent Conveyance, Preference Challenges and Avoidance Actions A Live 90-Minute Teleconference/Webinar with Interactive Q&A A Live 90-Minute Teleconference/Webinar with Interactive Q&A Today's panel features: David S. Musgrave, Principal, Ober Kaler , Baltimore F Thomas Rafferty Principal Ober Kaler Baltimore F. Thomas Rafferty, Principal, Ober Kaler , Baltimore Tuesday, October 12, 2010 The conference begins at: The conference begins at: 1 pm Eastern 12 pm Central 11 am Mountain 10 10 am Pacific P ifi You can access the audio portion of the conference on the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the dial in/ log in instructions emailed to registrants.

  2. For CLE purposes, please let us know how many people are listening at your location by y • closing the notification box • and typing in the chat box your • and typing in the chat box your company name and the number of attendees attendees. • Then click the blue icon beside the box to send to send. For live event only. y

  3. • If you are listening via your computer If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. lit f i t t ti • If the sound quality is not satisfactory and you are listening via your computer speakers, li t i i t k please dial 1-866-258-2056 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please send e p o p ed O e se, p ease se d us a chat or e-mail sound@straffordpub.com immediately so we can address the problem. • If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance.

  4. www.ober.com Bank Bankruptcy Litigation Strategies for ptc Litigation St ategies fo Secured Lenders and Other Creditors Minim izing Risks of Fraudulent Conveyance, Preference Challenges y , g and Avoidance Actions

  5. www.ober.com David S. Musgrave g Shareholder Ober, Kaler Grimes & Shriver 410 347 7391 410-347-7391 Fax: 443-263-7572 dsmusgrave@ober.com 5

  6. www.ober.com F. Thom as Rafferty Shareholder Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver 410-347-7372 Fax: 443 263 7572 Fax: 443-263-7572 ftrafferty@ober.com 6

  7. 7 www.ober.com • Fraudulent conveyance actions, Section 548 • Other avoidance actions, Sections 549, 544 Minim izing risks • Preferences, Section 547

  8. 8 www.ober.com Minim izing risks • Everything works sometime. • Nothing works every time.

  9. www.ober.com Section 5 4 7 • Section 547(b) – Six elements to prove a preference Six elements to prove a preference • Eliminate one or more to win • Eliminate one, or more, to win 9

  10. 10 www.ober.com • available for transferee to prove Section 5 4 7 • Section 547(c) - 9 exceptions • affirmative defenses to plead

  11. www.ober.com Section 5 4 7 ( b) : Property of the ( ) p y debtor – four exam ples • Factoring, “true sale” • No filed UCC-1 financing statements No filed UCC 1 financing statements • “precautionary” financing statements • skipped bankruptcy litigation • skipped bankruptcy litigation • sued the account debtor post bankruptcy • DON’T FIGHT UCC ARTICLE 9 • DON T FIGHT UCC ARTICLE 9 • DON’T BE MIA for 8 months 11

  12. www.ober.com Property of Debtor: No. 2 • Creative financing – MBE joint venture financing of fuel oil MBE joint venture financing of fuel oil • Competing interests: – ultimate customer requirement ultimate customer requirement – MBE working capital lender with lien on all assets assets – joint venture partner supplier 12

  13. www.ober.com Property of Debtor: No. 2 • A joint venture between MBE and supplier [ T] he unincorporated association of two or more persons to carry on as co- [ T] h i t d i ti f t t owners a business for profit forms a partnership, whether or not the persons intend to form a partnership and whether or not the association is called "partnership" "joint venture" or any other name RUPA partnership , joint venture , or any other name. RUPA. 13

  14. www.ober.com Property of the Debtor: No. 2 • Bankruptcy courts in various jurisdictions have held that a plaintiff trustee may not avoid a transfer of partnership property as a id t f f t hi t preference, because no transfer from the debtor’s estate has occurred. debtor s estate has occurred. • Notwithstanding a very pro-Trustee set of facts, a transfer of corporate property did not qualify as part of the debtor’s estate, despite 100% ownership by the debtor, little corporate formality and rampant fraud corporate formality, and rampant fraud. 14

  15. www.ober.com Property of Debtor: No. 3 • Security deposits, $25 million, $7 million – Held by third party y p y – Periodic renewal of income distribution absent default • Escrow agreement, – Held by third party – Trust law, legal and equitable interests T t l l l d it bl i t t – Security interest perfect by third party possession possession 15

  16. www.ober.com Property of Debtor: No. 4 • Construction lender with perfect UCC filings • Repossessing equipment supplier Repossessing equipment supplier • No delivery, no transfer of risk of loss • UCC Article 2 can help • UCC Article 2 can help • Equipment supplier wins at trial 16

  17. 17 www.ober.com • Ownership protection ripples through all the Property of the Debtor Section 5 4 7 ( b) : Section 5 4 7 ( b) : elements

  18. 18 www.ober.com 5 4 7 ( b) ( 4 ) : 9 0 Days • Useful to avoid unnecessary crash • Necessary to step out of routine • Prop to emphasize risk • Tolling Agreement

  19. www.ober.com Does a tolling agreem ent w ork? • VERY useful VERY useful • Private agreement to change statute • Stipulation that complaint filed within 90 • Stipulation that complaint filed within 90 days • Estoppel because of wrongful conduct Estoppel because of wrongful conduct • Contract in substitution • Jurisdiction “related to” • Jurisdiction, related to 19

  20. www.ober.com 5 4 7 ( b) ( 4 ) Deprizio echoes No reported problems for non-insider lender – two patches in 1994 and 2005 two patches in 1994 and 2005 20

  21. www.ober.com Deprizio echoes • Waiver of subrogation – failed to protect insider, enforcement denied because can’t , change statute by private contract, still liable for 1 year preference • Waiver of subrogation – enforced against insider guarantor who paid • Awareness for guarantor and lender 21

  22. www.ober.com Section 5 4 7 ( b) ( 5 ) : Section 5 4 7 ( b) ( 5 ) : Greater share than Chapter 7 • United Rentals equipment supplier • paid by subcontractor • loses to subcontractor trustee preference claim • despite surety • despite mechanics lien availability • NOT USED • No bond claim • No bond claim • No proof of contractor balance remaining to substantiate mechanic’s lien protection p • USE 22

  23. www.ober.com Greater share Use Bankruptcy Code protections: • Section 503(b)(9), 546(c) enhanced reclamation rights g • Section 365 assumption and cure defeats avoidance under Section 547(b)(5) ( )( ) • Section 546(b) notice of mechanics lien procedures 23

  24. www.ober.com 5 4 7 ( c) ( 2 ) : Ordinary course • Evidentiary issue: • List of preferential transfers p • Exhibit A to demand letter • Exhibit A to preference complaint • Some check registers, some analyses • Object to the summary. • Different account numbers, the terms and facts varied among the Debtor in possession general ledger accounts FRE 1006 general ledger accounts. FRE 1006 24

  25. www.ober.com “I ndefeasibly Paid” • “Indefeasible” used as promise and court order • Indefeasibility of payment is like finality court order • Not known until after future events have N t k til ft f t t h happened • Senior lender intercreditor agreement • Senior lender intercreditor agreement proposal to subordinated lender • “no payment to subordinated lender until p y senior lender has been indefeasibly paid” 25

  26. www.ober.com Bankruptcy “proof” settlem ent • Here are some ways to minimize likelihood of successful preference attack if debtor files p bankruptcy petition within ninety days of settlement. 26

  27. • Structure payment in such a manner that it is 27 www.ober.com Structure of Paym ent not an avoidable preference. p

  28. www.ober.com Third Party Paym ent • A payment is not preferential if made from assets of third party and effect of payment is p y p y not to diminish assets remaining in estate. Third party can be subsidiary or affiliate of Debtor, as long as third party will not itself be D bt l thi d t ill t it lf b debtor in bankruptcy. 28

  29. www.ober.com Debtor Borrow s Money • If Debtor borrows money from third party to make payment, court might consider p y , g payment as having been made to Debtor and from Debtor to creditor, making it an avoidable preference. id bl f 29

Recommend


More recommend