Automation of Federal Shariat Court History Official Website - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jan 12, 2023 •149 likes •406 views

Automation of Federal Shariat Court History Official Website Software Development Expeditious Justice Future plan History Initiative to automate all activities being carried out manually in Federal Shariat Court was taken

Automation of Federal Shariat Court  History  Official Website  Software Development  Expeditious Justice  Future plan
History  Initiative to automate all activities being carried out manually in Federal Shariat Court was taken in November 2006 under Access to Justice Program. The project “ Automation of Federal Shariat Court” was approved by DDWP in November, 2006. But the physical activity could be possible to start in August, 2007 after release of funds.
Official website  Official Website developed and launched in 2006.  http:// www.federalshariatcourt.gov.pk
Software Development  Case Flow Management System:- Case Flow Management system has been developed and following are the key features of this software: • Case Institution • Search Any Case Record • Online Reported Judgments • Bench Allocation • Date Fixation • Case Hearing • Online Case Tracking • Report Generation
Software Development (continued)  Human Resource Management System  Stock & Inventory System  SMS Alert System  Easy Quran WA Hadith  Library Management System (KOHA)  Digital Library
Online Reported Judgments
Online Reported Judgments (continued)
Easy Quran WA Hadith
Easy Quran WA Hadith
Easy Quran WA Hadith
Digital Library  Digital library • Federal Shariat Court is maintaining a Digital Library containing more than 30,000 titles. • The library is available at the desktop of all users linked on Intranet. • The books can be searched through author, title, subject and the keyword. • There are a lot of multivolume encyclopedias and dictionaries in pdf format.
Digital Library
Digital Library
Digital Library
Digital Library
Expeditious Justice 1. Adjournment 2. Topic Wise Cause List
Expeditious Justice Adjournment  Reason for delay • Adjournment  Limits of Adjournment
Case Adjournment
Case Adjournment
Topic wise Cause List
Topic Wise cause List
Future Plan  Notice Service & Acknowledgement System  Compensation System for the parties in case of adjournment.
THANK YOU

Recommend

Technology in the federal courts Warwick Soden Chief Executive Officer Federal Court of

Technology in the federal courts Warwick Soden Chief Executive Officer Federal Court of Australia Family Court of Australia STATS ECF was introduced into the Federal Court (FCA) and Federal Circuit Court: General Federal Law Division

373 views • 18 slides

Federal Court Jurisdiction: Diversity Federal Court Jurisdiction: Diversity and Removal

Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A Federal Court Jurisdiction: Diversity Federal Court Jurisdiction: Diversity and Removal Complexities Navigating the Intricate Jurisdiction Standards and Removal Process THURS DAY,

827 views • 47 slides

1 Automation Overview Definition Automation (automation, Automation ) : 1) set of all measures

Industrial Automation Spring 2019, EPFL 1 Automation Overview Definition Automation (automation, Automation ) : 1) set of all measures aiming at replacing human work through machines (e.g. automation is applied science) 2) the

1.39k views • 63 slides

The Federal Circuit month at M ont h at a Glance RES J UDICATA BARS FEDERAL COURT COUNTER-

SEPTEM BER 1999 Last The Federal Circuit month at M ont h at a Glance RES J UDICATA BARS FEDERAL COURT COUNTER- DISCLOSURE SUPPORTS BROADER CLAIM CLAIM CONSTRUCTION Proper application of res judicata requires proof of: Prosecution

273 views • 12 slides

Federal Court Practice 2017 Recent Court Initiatives 21st Annual Intellectual Property Law: The

Federal Court Practice 2017 Recent Court Initiatives 21st Annual Intellectual Property Law: The Year in Review Thursday, January 19, 2017 1 Overview 1. Access to Justice 2. Notice to the Profession Experimental Testing 3. Case

502 views • 18 slides

Federal Way Municipal Court Budget Presentation September 27, 2018 Judge David Larson Judge

Federal Way Municipal Court Budget Presentation September 27, 2018 Judge David Larson Judge Rebecca Robertson Susanne White, Court Administrator Requests $5,000 for Community Court Expenses and Pilot Project $7,000 for increased

342 views • 10 slides

ONLINE POKER United States v. DiCristina The federal district court for the Eastern District of

ONLINE POKER United States v. DiCristina The federal district court for the Eastern District of New York, 21 August 2012 The federal district court held that Texas Hold'em poker is not 'gambling' as defined in the Illegal Gambling Business Act

65 views • 3 slides

TRUSTED DOCUMENT DELIVERY: MALAYSIAS E -COURT SYSTEM Hamidah Mohamed Deril Deputy Registrar,

FEDERAL COURT OF MALAYSI A TRUSTED DOCUMENT DELIVERY: MALAYSIAS E -COURT SYSTEM Hamidah Mohamed Deril Deputy Registrar, SILVERSTR & SONS LAWYER BOUTIQUE Chief Registrars Office, Federal Court of Malaysia New York Office Hobes

952 views • 47 slides

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ BRIDGESTONE

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS TIRE OPERATIONS, LLC ( FORMERLY B RIDGESTONE F IRESTONE N ORTH A MERICAN T IRE , LLC) AND BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION, Appellants, v. FEDERAL

271 views • 10 slides

The Federal Circuit month at COURT TAKES A BITE OUT OF APPLE Rejecting Apples claim

Last The Federal Circuit month at COURT TAKES A BITE OUT OF APPLE Rejecting Apples claim constructions, Court affirms summary judgment of invalidity of several asserted claims and remands for findings concerning obviousness of certain

434 views • 8 slides

CIP Data Collection Reporting Requirements for Federal FY 2012-2016 WHY: States accepting Court

CIP Data Collection Reporting Requirements for Federal FY 2012-2016 WHY: States accepting Court Improvement Program grant funds are required to collect and report on five timeliness measures beginning in Federal Fiscal Year 2013. WHERE:

420 views • 14 slides

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ M.R.

N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ M.R. MIKKILINENI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROBERT STOLL, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS, Defendant-Appellee.

255 views • 4 slides

Federal Court of Australia Melbourne 18 March 2014 David C Turner Barrister and Mediator,

National Commercial Law Seminar Series Personal Property Securities Act: Beyond the Transitional Period Ordina ry Co urse o f Busine ss a nd o the r T ra nsfe re e Rule s Federal Court of Australia Melbourne 18 March 2014 David

850 views • 46 slides

Client Alert Federal Court Issues Preliminary Injunction Preserving Medicaid Home Contact

Client Alert Federal Court Issues Preliminary Injunction Preserving Medicaid Home Contact Attorney Regarding Care Services for New York Residents This Matter: W. Jerad Rissler The United States District Court for the Southern District of New

305 views • 4 slides

LEOTF Disbursements to Date 98,000 SB 179 (2015} $96,071 96,000 transferred $5.00 of the

22 - CAF PowerPoint Tuesday, March 01, 2016 8:20 AM Court Automation Fund (CAF)Update Unified Judicial System Greg Sattizahn, State Court Administrator Janet Borchard, Director of Budget & Finance October 30, 2015 Revenues Flowing into CAF

474 views • 10 slides

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

02-1540 Page 1 of 12 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 02-1540,-1541,-1542,-1543,-1544,-1545,-1546,-1547,-1548,-1549, 03-1021,-1022,-1023,-1025,-1027 SCHERING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENEVA PHARMACEUTICALS,

553 views • 12 slides

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1092 CYBERSETTLE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM, INC., Defendant-Appellant. Daniel A. Ladow, Dreier LLP, of

401 views • 14 slides

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 01-1169 (Interference No. 103,324)

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 01-1169 (Interference No. 103,324) MICHAEL J. ADANG and JOHN D. KEMP, Appellants, v. DAVID A. FISCHHOFF and STEPHEN G. ROGERS, Appellees. Oliver R. Ashe, Jr., Greenblum & Bernstein,

504 views • 25 slides

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 01-1545 JOSEPH KWAME OKOR,

01-1545 Page 1 of 3 NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this disposition is not citable as precedent. It is a public record. This disposition will appear in tables published periodically. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

452 views • 3 slides

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 04-1134 MEDRAD, INC.,

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 04-1134 MEDRAD, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MRI DEVICES CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. W. Thomas McGough, Jr., Reed Smith LLP, of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, argued for

702 views • 17 slides

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ INTEL

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ INTEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NEGOTIATED DATA SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellant, AND ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL, INC., ACER AMERICA

512 views • 14 slides

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ (Serial No.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ (Serial No. 09/863,585) IN RE PHYLLIS LEITHEM, CHARLES A. KREMERS, W. PAUL HARRELL, STEPHEN LEWIS, KARL D. SEARS, QUAN HE, AND PETER R. ABITZ

506 views • 11 slides

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 05-1324 (Interference No. 105,187)

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 05-1324 (Interference No. 105,187) FALKO-GUNTER FALKNER, GEORG HOLZER, and FRIEDRICH DORNER, Appellants, v. STEPHEN C. INGLIS, MICHAEL E.G. BOURSNELL, and ANTHONY C. MINSON, Appellees.

442 views • 19 slides

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 00-1543 KX INDUSTRIES, L.P. and KOSLOW

00-1543 Page 1 of 7 NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this disposition is not citable as precedent. It is a public record. This disposition will appear in tables published periodically. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

330 views • 7 slides