AHURI RESEARCH WEBINAR SERIES Australian home ownership: Past reflections, future directions Professor Terry Burke Swinburne University of Technology Dr Heather Holst Victorian Department of Justice and Community Safety Dr Michael Fotheringham Executive Director, AHURI #AHURIwebinar
AHURI RESEARCH WEBINAR SERIES Welcome Dr Michael Fotheringham Executive Director, AHURI #AHURIwebinar
COVID-19 RESOURCE HUB Visit: ahuri.edu.au/covid-19 Contact us at: information@ahuri.edu.au #AHURIwebinar
HOUSEKEEPING Webinar recording available at: ahuri.edu.au/events/webinar-Australian-home-ownership Complete our survey: to be sent following today’s webinar #AHURIwebinar
WEBINAR FEATURES Change audio settings Submit questions for presenter #AHURIwebinar
TODAY’S WEBINAR Presenter: Professor Terry Burke Swinburne University of Technology Respondent: Dr Heather Holst Victorian Department of Justice and Community Safety Research: Australian home ownership: past reflections, future directions Download the report: ahuri.edu.au/research/final-reports/328 #AHURIwebinar
PRESENTATION Australian home ownership: Past reflections, future directions Professor Terry Burke, Swinburne University of Technology AHURI Research Webinar Series Wed 20 May 2020
Australian Home Ownership: past reflections, future directions Terry Burke Christian Nygaard Liss Ralston Swinburne University of Technology
PART 1 What is this study about Uses an Institutional Framework to understand Australia’s home ownership past and its likely future.
What is an Institutional analysis • Every country has a distinctive housing system including that of tenure. • The housing system is shaped by the institutional framework of that country or society. • So what is an institutional framework? • It is all those values, structures, and mechanisms that shape social and economic behaviour, organisational forms, and governance in a society
An institutional framework—components and behaviours of the housing tenure system
Why use such an approach? • Much analysis of Australian housing problems, including ownership decline, is over simplistic and does not accommodate complexity. • The explanatory focus tends to be on one, or a limited few, explanatory variables e.g. affordability, foreign investment. • In turn this leads to over simplistic policy response e.g. deregulation of the planning system, investment controls • But for all the incremental policy changes over recent decades it is hard to see evidence of better housing outcomes. • Institutional Analysis promises a richer but more complex analysis.
How was the institutional approach used? 1. A data analysis of long term trends in Australian home ownership using changes in the institutional context as explanation. 2. A comparative analysis of ownership trends in 18 equivalent countries highlighting how institutional differences can generate different ownership outcomes.
Australia’s changing institutional Context 1940-1970 1980 -2020 • High economic growth and Full employment Weaker economic growth and employment • Secure and stable labour markets Deregulated labour market; Greater job • Regulated financial system with implicit insecurity objectives of supporting home ownership Deregulated finance system (no special • Construction industry geared to ownership focus on ownership) products; the detached dwelling Construction industry created new rental • Supportive housing, taxation and planning products, i.e. multi unit apartments policy Taxation, planning, policy as much • Rapid growth of young (and particularly two facilitative of private rental as ownership income households –the drivers of ownership Financialisation of housing; the dwellling • Dwelling as a home not an investment becomes as much as an investment as a home.
Home purchase, outright ownership and all ownership trends, Australia, 1947– 2016
Outcomes of the changing institutional environments. What does the data say? Ownership has held up better than might be expected, due to ageing of the population Overall ownership trends disguise major age cohort differences: • Long term ownership (1986-2016) has fallen sharply for the 25-44 age cohorts compared to 3 percent for all age cohorts • The fall in ownership has been concentrated in the lowest 50 percent of household incomes; the highest 20 percent have had minimal fall.
Outcomes of the changing institutional environments. • Single income purchasers have fallen from 44% of all purchasers in 1981 to 14% by 2016 • The rate of ownership for migrants in 1986 was marginally higher than the Australian born. In 2016 it is well below that of the Australian born • Victoria over the last 30 years has a high contraction in ownership than other states and territories
What does the future hold? What is likely future context? Projected ownership rates 2016-2041 Slower economic growth Weak real income growth for young households Workforce participation growth slower Little improvement in housing affordability More rental products e.g. build to rent Little change to policy directions facilitating rental investment Continued rapid population growth.
So Australian ownership is in trouble; how does this compare internationally? • Australia in the 1960-70 was the definitive ownership society with the highest rate among developed countries • By the mid 2000s we had lost that status; other countries had pushed ownership well above Australia’s 71% peak. • Post the Global financial crisis ownership is in retreat in most developed countries • The biggest retreat has been in market liberal societies like Australia; the USA, UK and New Zealand.
The GFC and ownership retreat. Why? Despite large price falls and improvements in affordability ownership still fell. Why? • GFC reinforced income inequalities many household experienced real income falls • Finance institutions become cautious in lending to households • Stimulation measures of governments favoured developers and rental investors e.g. Build to rent in the UK. • GFC accentuated the financialisation of property as investors (the more affluent in society) sought secure outlets for money
Where do we go from here; policy implications of ownership decline?. Three related institutional and housing system changes; • Recognition of the need to make a transition to a dual tenure system giving equal weight to ownership and rental. • Acknowledgement of the generational and wealth divides implicit in this system with need for compensatory redistribution mechanisms. • Policy focus need to go beyond housing to that of labour and financial markets, population growth and settlement patterns, income and wealth distribution, income support program, and taxation .
Kick starting the process. The need for a bi partisan national housing and urban strategy undertaken within a broad institutional framework. If Canada can do it then why can’t we?
Audience Q&A Submit questions for presenter Download the report: ahuri.edu.au/research/final-reports/328 AHURI Research Webinar Series Wed 20 May 2020
OUR NEXT WEBINAR… Thu 11 June 2020: 2.00pm (AEST) Improving outcomes for apartment residents and neighbourhoods Associate Professor Hazel Easthope, UNSW Sydney Dr Laura Crommelin, UNSW Sydney Registrations open in the coming days Visit: ahuri.edu.au/events #AHURIwebinar
AHURI RESEARCH WEBINAR SERIES Thank you for attending AHURI Research Webinar Series Wed 20 May 2020
Recommend
More recommend
