th Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007 4 Airborne Separation Assistance System (ASAS) Thematic Network 2: ASAS applications maturity assessment Operational concept 4 3 Benefits & Transition issues 2 constraints 1 0 System s, HM I & Safety Technology P rocedures & hum an factors 2007 2006 Chris Shaw, EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre
th Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007 4 Contents of presentation • Introduction • Objectives • Method – Applications – Maturity metrics • Results • Conclusion
th Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007 4 Introduction • ASAS Thematic Network 2 – Sponsored by European Commission Directorate General Research 6 th Framework – Three year project from April 2005 – Aim: to accelerate the application of ASAS operations in European Airspace taking into account global applicability in order to increase airspace capacity and safety. – Managed by consortium: BAE Systems, ENAV, LFV, NLR, Thales ATM & Thales Avionics, EUROCONTROL (leader)
th Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007 4 Objectives • 5 ASAS workshops & final seminar – Malmo (Oct 2005), Rome (Apr 2006) – Glasgow (Sep 2006), Amsterdam (Apr 2007), – Toulouse (Sep 2007) • Web-based ASAS related documentation • Annual assessment of the maturity of global ADS-B/ASAS applications by ASAS-TN2 partners – Deliverables: Report ”ASAS application maturity assessment” V1 March 2006, update V2 2007 & V3 due 2008
th Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007 4 ADS-B • Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B) Mode S Extended Squitter: – Europe: In Oct 2006, 54% of flights equipped (38% in Jan 2006) of which 66% broadcasting position (53% in Jan 2006) [source: CASCADE] – Hong Kong: In Mar 2006 34% equipped (32% in Dec 2005) [source: ICAO] ADS-B Receiver ground-station
th Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007 4 Method (1/3) • 18 ASAS applications: – ADS-B surveillance – Airborne traffic situational awareness – Airborne spacing – Airborne separation – Airborne self-separation • 12 ASAS specialists from: BAE systems (UK), ENAV (Italy), LFV (Sweden), NLR (The Netherlands), Thales ATM (France), Thales Avionics (France) and EUROCONTROL
th Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007 4 Method (2/3) • Maturity metrics scale 0 to 4 (±0.5): – Operational concepts – Benefits and constraints – Safety assessment – Procedures and human factors – Systems, HMI and technology – Transition issues • Results reviewed by selected peers from US, Europe and Australia
th Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007 4 Method (3/3) Example metric - Operational concept 1 = Problem statement, identify solutions, concept generation (concept of operations) 2 = Preliminary Operational Concept Description (R&D Operational Service and Environment Description (OSED)) 3 = Draft Requirements Focus Group (RFG) OSED in development (e.g. from R&D OSEDs, trials and experiments, initial OSED) – mature and in review. 4 = Consolidated OSED - Published
Maturity score 12 16 20 24 0 4 8 ADS-B-APT ADS-B-RAD ADS-B-NRA ADS-B-ADD 4 Results (1/3) - overview th Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007 ATSA-AIRB ATSA-SURF ATSA-ITP ATSA-VSA A SA 2006 S application ASPA-S&M ASPA-C&P 2007 ASEP-LC&P ASEP-VC&P ASEP-ITP ASEP-ITF ASEP-S&M SSEP-FFAS SSEP-MAS SSEP-FFT
th Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007 4 Results (2/3) – detailed examples Highest maturity score Lowest maturity score ATC surveillance in non-radar Vertical crossing and passing areas (Airborne separation) Operational concept Operational concept 4 4 3 Benefits & 3 Benefits & Transition issues Transition issues 2 2 constraints constraints 1 1 0 0 Systems, HMI & System s, HM I & Safety Safety Technology Technology P rocedures & P rocedures & human factors hum an factors 2007 2006 2007 2006
th Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007 4 Results (3/3) – maturity rates Largest increase in maturity score Decrease in maturity score In-trail procedure Enhanced traffic situational (Airborne separation) awareness during flight operations Operational concept Operational concept 4 4 3 Benefits & 3 Benefits & Transition issues 2 Transition issues 2 constraints constraints 1 1 0 0 Systems, HM I & Systems, HMI & Safety Safety Technology Technology P rocedures & P rocedures & human factors human factors 2006 2007 2007 2006
th Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007 4 Conclusion • Of 18 applications: 7 have total maturity scores in range 12-21 out of 24, • From 2006-7, 15 applications increased in maturity score (1 new), 2 unchanged, 1 decreased, overall increase 10% • Version 1 & 2 of report available on ASAS-TN2 website (http://www.asas-tn.org/reports) • Notification of 17,000 ATM stakeholders through article in EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre newsletter • Third assessment by ASAS-TN2 due in 2008
Recommend
More recommend
