anita l stewart ph d institute for health aging center
play

Anita L. Stewart, Ph.D. Institute for Health & Aging Center for - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Anita L. Stewart, Ph.D. Institute for Health & Aging Center for Aging in Diverse Communities September 12, 2018 1 Phases of Disparities Research Detect Define health disparities Measure disparities in vulnerable populations Understand


  1. Anita L. Stewart, Ph.D. Institute for Health & Aging Center for Aging in Diverse Communities September 12, 2018 1

  2. Phases of Disparities Research Detect Define health disparities Measure disparities in vulnerable populations Understand Identify determinants of disparities Reduce Intervene Translate/disseminate Adapted from Kilbourne AM et al, Change policy AJPH , 2006;12:2113-21. 2

  3. Understanding Disparities  What is it about being in a minority group that could lead to poorer health?  Behaviors, attitudes, values, beliefs  Access to health care  Quality of health care  Discrimination, educational experiences 3

  4. Reducing Disparities  How can we design and evaluate interventions that can improve health in minority populations?  Evidence-based  Designed to meet needs of population  Appealing/culturally sensitive  Practical, feasible  Effective 4

  5. Role of Conceptual Frameworks to Understand and Reduce Disparities  Ground research in theory and knowledge  Identify and organize key variables on pathway  Help develop specific research questions and methods of analysis  Guide selection of measures  Visually depict study 5

  6. Advantages of Conceptual Frameworks  For proposals  Clarify specific aims  For epidemiologic studies  Clarify determinants, mediators, and moderators of health outcome  For interventions  Clarify mechanisms of action of intervention components 6

  7. Study-Specific Conceptual Framework  Definition: A diagram of proposed causal linkages among a set of concepts believed to be related to a particular health problem Earp JA and Ennett ST, Health Educ Res , 1991;6:163-171 . 7

  8. Types of Conceptual Frameworks  Population science  Multi-level determinants of health  Health services research  How health care affects health  Interventions  How intervention components are linked to outcomes 8

  9. Types of Conceptual Frameworks  Population science  Multi-level determinants of health  Health services research  How health care affects health  Interventions  How intervention components are linked to outcomes 9

  10. Ecological Context Generic Model Society Community Family Individual 10

  11. Multi-level (Ecological) Determinants of Health Disparities Contextual factors Individual-level factors Physical environment Sociodemographic – age, race, ethnicity, education Social environment Psychosocial – coping, social support Health care Health disparities Lifestyle – physical activity, Economic resources diet, smoking Community resources Psychological – beliefs, attitudes, personality Societal, political 11

  12. Health Care as Determinant of Health Disparities Contextual factors Individual-level factors Physical environment Sociodemographic – age, race, ethnicity, education Social environment Psychosocial – coping, social support Health care Health disparities Lifestyle – physical activity, Economic resources diet, smoking Community resources Psychological – beliefs, attitudes, personality Societal, political 12

  13. Types of Conceptual Frameworks  Population science  Multi-level determinants of health  Health services research  How health care affects health  Interventions  How intervention components are linked to outcomes 13

  14. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Annual report on healthcare disparities (since 2003) https://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhqdr16/index.html 14

  15. Conceptual Framework: National Healthcare Disparities Reports Consumer Components of Healthcare Quality perspectives on Patient- health care centered needs Safety Effectiveness care Timeliness Staying healthy Getting better Living with illness or disability Coping with the end of life 15

  16. The Structure-Process-Outcome Paradigm for Assessing Quality of Care Structure of Process of care Patient health care outcomes - technical -system - clinical -interpersonal - individual Technical process – knowledge and judgement skills Interpersonal process – the way care is provided Donabedian A, Qual Rev Bull , 1992, p. 356-360. 16

  17. The Structure-Process-Outcome Paradigm: Variations (cont) Structure Process of care Intermediate of care -technical outcomes -system -interpersonal -compliance -knowledge Long-term outcomes -health 17

  18. The Structure-Process-Outcome Paradigm: Variations (cont) Intermediate Structure Process of care: outcomes of care -technical care -blood pressure -system -interpersonal -HbA1c care Long-term outcomes -diabetes -CVD 18

  19. The Structure-Process-Outcome Paradigm: Variations (cont) Intermediate Structure Process of care: outcomes of care -technical care -blood pressure -system -interpersonal -HbA1c care Provider characteristics Long-term outcomes -diabetes -CVD 19

  20. The Structure-Process-Outcome Paradigm: Variations (cont) Intermediate Structure Process of care: outcomes of care -technical care -blood pressure -system -interpersonal -HbA1c care Provider characteristics Long-term Patient characteristics outcomes - age, education, LEP -diabetes -health behaviors -communication skills -CVD 20

  21. Interpersonal Processes of Care and Health Disparities  Does the quality of MD-patient communication affect health outcomes?  Are there disparities in receipt of shared decision making?  Do these disparities affect health outcomes? 21

  22. Framework Clarifies Narrative: Interpersonal Processes of Care  The intervention will increase compliance with treatment by training doctors to communicate risk information in a manner that is culturally appropriate and easily understood by patients.  We will assess patient understanding of risk and treatment details as an explanation for the intervention’s effect on compliance. From RCMAR Webinar “Incorporating Conceptual Models Into Your Research Proposals” by Clemma Muller (Feb 22, 2018) 22

  23. Study-Specific Conceptual Framework Effect Cause MD-Patient Compliance communication The intervention will increase compliance with treatment by training doctors to communicate risk information in a manner that is culturally appropriate and easily understood by patients 23

  24. Study-Specific Conceptual Framework Effect Cause Mechanism = Mediator MD-Patient Patient Compliance communication understanding of risk and regimen The intervention will increase We will assess patient compliance with treatment by understanding of risk and training doctors to communicate treatment details as an risk information in a manner that explanation for the is culturally appropriate and intervention’s effect on easily understood by patients compliance. 24

  25. Adding Modifying and Confounding Variables MD & Patient genders or race/ethnicity MD-Patient Patient Compliance communication understanding of regimen Complexity of regimen Earp and Ennett, 1991. 25

  26. Technical Process of Care and Health Disparities  Are treatments less effective for racial/ethnic minorities than whites?  Are appropriate diagnostic procedures used less often for minorities than whites?  Do these affect health outcomes  Are optimal treatments provided less often for minorities? 26

  27. Types of Conceptual Frameworks  Population science  Multi-level determinants of health  Health services research  How health care affects health  Interventions  How intervention components are linked to outcomes 27

  28. Intervention Conceptual Frameworks: Two Related Purposes  How intervention works to improve outcomes  Proposed mechanisms  Overall visual depiction  How intervention components map to outcomes  To choose measures 28

  29. How Framework Clarifies Narrative (Example)  Cognitive-Behavioral Stress-Management Intervention  Based on social cognitive theory, the cognitive-behavioral stress management intervention (CBSM) aims to improve outcomes through two cognitive and behavioral mediators (self-efficacy and self- management practices) and social support. Nápoles AM et al., Clin Trials , 2014;11:230-238. 29

  30. Conceptual Framework: CBSM Intervention 30

  31. Conceptual Framework: Pain Self- Management (PSM) Intervention Proximal Outcomes: Mediators Intervention • Pain severity • Social support Components & interference Adoption • Self-efficacy • Group sessions • Physical of PSM • Pain self- • Peer function behaviors management interventionist • Emotional skills • One-on-one PSM well-being • Self-regulation session Merlin JS et al., Contemp Clin Trials Commun . 2018;10:9-16. 31

  32. Community of Voices (Choral Singing) Conceptual Framework Engagement components Mechanisms Outcomes • Social network • New friends • Sense of Psycho- • Loneliness • Weekly activity belonging social • Depression • Singing is joyful • Meaningful • Anxiety activity • Lower body • Stand to sing • Strength Physical strength • Stretch/warm up • Balance • Balance • Executive function • Learn new music • Brain Cognitive • Memory • Attend to director stimulation Johnson J et al., BMC Public Health, 2015;15:1049 .

  33. Map Intervention Components to Outcomes  For each desired outcome, describe how intervention or components might affect it  Specific types of changes you expect  Map “need” that component is addressing 33

Recommend


More recommend